Jump to content
jamalshw

Is it too early to plan for 2014?

Recommended Posts

The Orioles went to the ALCS twice with probably the worst defensive catchers in baseball. The catcher position is valuable, but Wieters is not irreplaceable.
The question isn't if Wieters is irreplaceable, though you have no way of establishing his true value to the team. The question is what team needs an upgrade in C enough to take on his salary, give up good prospects, as well as a pick? If as you say C is so easily replaceable why would any team want to give up much for him? Which team did you have in mind? I love these nebulous trade proposals that don't take into consideration the potential market and return. :rolleyestf:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Orioles went to the ALCS twice with probably the worst defensive catchers in baseball. The catcher position is valuable, but Wieters is not irreplaceable.

2012 - Posey

2011 - Molina

2010 - Posey

2009 - Posada

You notice a tend for the last four WS winning rosters?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The drop off wouldn't be as large as you would think as other teams with catchers not named Matt Wieters are in the playoffs. You make up the value elsewhere.

Just to be clear. You think, a guy who was a throw-in in a roster dump of two players should be the starting catcher on a playoff contending team?

I like Clevenger but you are extremely over-valuing him. And assuming that Buck would put up with his poor defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just to be clear. You think, a guy who was a throw-in in a roster dump of two players should be the starting catcher on a playoff contending team?

I like Clevenger but you are extremely over-valuing him. And assuming that Buck would put up with his poor defense.

I think Duquette targeted Clevenger. And I'd platoon him with a veteran backup anyway but Buck wouldn't have many other options so he'd be forced to play him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The question isn't if Wieters is irreplaceable, though you have no way of establishing his true value to the team. The question is what team needs an upgrade in C enough to take on his salary, give up good prospects, as well as a pick? If as you say C is so easily replaceable why would any team want to give up much for him? Which team did you have in mind? I love these nebulous trade proposals that don't take into consideration the potential market and return. :rolleyestf:

Plenty of teams still overvalue catchers, so Wieters would have plenty of suitors. Wieters would be cheaper than McCann, so the Braves could be interested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Duquette targeted Clevenger. And I'd platoon him with a veteran backup anyway but Buck wouldn't have many other options so he'd be forced to play him.

Clevenger has a .587 OPS against opposite-handed pitching.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2012 - Posey

2011 - Molina

2010 - Posey

2009 - Posada

You notice a tend for the last four WS winning rosters?

And Chris Hoiles was the worst defensive C in baseball in 1996. :rolleyestf: He was a 2.5 UZR. The worst C that year was Mike Stanley at -9.3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And Chris Hoiles was the worst defensive C in baseball in 1996. :rolleyestf: He was a 2.5 UZR. The worst C that year was Mike Stanley at -9.3.

I could buy his argument about trading Wieters to get wins in other areas, since I like to think that way sometimes, but Clevenger is probably not an answer here. Defense or no.

And I think Wieters has enough of a bat and glove and arm to justify what he will likely make next year. He's not a guy I want long-term, as he'll probably be in a wheelchair by 32 (which didn't stop Jason Giambi). But he's pretty important to the offense all things considered. The plight of being a switch-hitting catcher is you get to play more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And Chris Hoiles was the worst defensive C in baseball in 1996. :rolleyestf: He was a 2.5 UZR. The worst C that year was Mike Stanley at -9.3.

They didnt make the world series, either. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Plenty of teams still overvalue catchers, so Wieters would have plenty of suitors. Wieters would be cheaper than McCann, so the Braves could be interested.

You base this on what? What you pulled out of your service entrance? at 30 with some injury issues recently I doubt McCann gets more than 10 M per as a FA. Wieters will get about 7 M. So the Braves will give up a couple of top SP prospects in order to save 3 M? :rofl: Who else did you have in mind besides them.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I could buy his argument about trading Wieters to get wins in other areas, since I like to think that way sometimes, but Clevenger is probably not an answer here. Defense or no.

And I think Wieters has enough of a bat and glove and arm to justify what he will likely make next year. He's not a guy I want long-term, as he'll probably be in a wheelchair by 32 (which didn't stop Jason Giambi). But he's pretty important to the offense all things considered. The plight of being a switch-hitting catcher is you get to play more.

Nothing wrong with trading Wieters but who are you trading him to, and what are you getting in return? If you can't answer that, there's no point in even bringing it up. You might as well say lets trade Manny, we could get every thing we need to get to the WS for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Plenty of teams still overvalue catchers, so Wieters would have plenty of suitors. Wieters would be cheaper than McCann, so the Braves could be interested.

I hate to say it, but another team that would make sense is the Yankees. They always view themselves as contenders and have a hole there right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Yeah...in the minors. I don’t know anything about the guy, but if his defense is bad, he’s not really a utility guy, because utility guys by definition are glove-good at multiple positions. If he hits really well, he’s a 1B/DH type, and if he doesn’t hit well, he’s nothing. I just checked his stats at BBR and his D at both positions is poor.
    • What constitutes blazing? .400 OBP AND ~.900 OPS each of the last two years is pretty good. 
    • Me either but I voted Rom and Smith.
    • Does anyone know where to get minor league team home and away splits?  A quick perusal of Ashville hitters 2019 splits only reinforced the idea that Vavra 's 2019 numbers were possibly inflated due to a favorable home park.
    • Who are the #17 and #18 Prospects
    • You are right about the hours played each day. It is a big part of the culture on the islands. I have been coaching kids for the last 15 years in Central Florida. Like Drungo said, kids have more options and distractions in the US. It can be tough to get a kid to put the work in away from the field when we only practice two days a week in the younger ages. The higher end travel teams do not practice in the high school years, not at all. They can't because their kids are from all over the state, or even the nation. They show up and play for a week to ten days and go home until the next tournament. Meanwhile, the DR kids are at a Baseball Academy year round for 2-3 years before they sign a contract. It really isn't a level playing field, developmentally. There are a few places where you can go to a high school that is a baseball academy, TNXL is one here in Altamonte Springs, Florida. TNXL is run by the Scorpions organization.  More kids in Florida play baseball than many Northern states, but the burnout rate is high in Florida as well. Year round baseball, or any sport for that matter, is not a good thing long term. Overuse injuries, such as all of the elbow and shoulder issues for pitchers are a direct result of this. College coaches all want to know what other sports a kid plays. The three sport stars are discouraged from playing three sports. Football is still king in Florida. Baseball also does not develop athleticism, although it demands it. So you have to play explosive movement sports, and/or train at a complex to develop the athleticism. That gets expensive, along with everything else you have to do to have a chance. My son worked out at the same place that Ryan Mountcastle and Blake Bortles worked out at. Excellent results.  The gap is closing with the proliferation of indoor facilities. Kids can work on their skills year round now. Seeing more kids from Pennsylvania in recent years who play the game at a very high level. That is a very good thing IMO. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...