Jump to content
jamalshw

Is it too early to plan for 2014?

Recommended Posts

The Orioles went to the ALCS twice with probably the worst defensive catchers in baseball. The catcher position is valuable, but Wieters is not irreplaceable.
The question isn't if Wieters is irreplaceable, though you have no way of establishing his true value to the team. The question is what team needs an upgrade in C enough to take on his salary, give up good prospects, as well as a pick? If as you say C is so easily replaceable why would any team want to give up much for him? Which team did you have in mind? I love these nebulous trade proposals that don't take into consideration the potential market and return. :rolleyestf:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Orioles went to the ALCS twice with probably the worst defensive catchers in baseball. The catcher position is valuable, but Wieters is not irreplaceable.

2012 - Posey

2011 - Molina

2010 - Posey

2009 - Posada

You notice a tend for the last four WS winning rosters?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The drop off wouldn't be as large as you would think as other teams with catchers not named Matt Wieters are in the playoffs. You make up the value elsewhere.

Just to be clear. You think, a guy who was a throw-in in a roster dump of two players should be the starting catcher on a playoff contending team?

I like Clevenger but you are extremely over-valuing him. And assuming that Buck would put up with his poor defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just to be clear. You think, a guy who was a throw-in in a roster dump of two players should be the starting catcher on a playoff contending team?

I like Clevenger but you are extremely over-valuing him. And assuming that Buck would put up with his poor defense.

I think Duquette targeted Clevenger. And I'd platoon him with a veteran backup anyway but Buck wouldn't have many other options so he'd be forced to play him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The question isn't if Wieters is irreplaceable, though you have no way of establishing his true value to the team. The question is what team needs an upgrade in C enough to take on his salary, give up good prospects, as well as a pick? If as you say C is so easily replaceable why would any team want to give up much for him? Which team did you have in mind? I love these nebulous trade proposals that don't take into consideration the potential market and return. :rolleyestf:

Plenty of teams still overvalue catchers, so Wieters would have plenty of suitors. Wieters would be cheaper than McCann, so the Braves could be interested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Duquette targeted Clevenger. And I'd platoon him with a veteran backup anyway but Buck wouldn't have many other options so he'd be forced to play him.

Clevenger has a .587 OPS against opposite-handed pitching.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2012 - Posey

2011 - Molina

2010 - Posey

2009 - Posada

You notice a tend for the last four WS winning rosters?

And Chris Hoiles was the worst defensive C in baseball in 1996. :rolleyestf: He was a 2.5 UZR. The worst C that year was Mike Stanley at -9.3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And Chris Hoiles was the worst defensive C in baseball in 1996. :rolleyestf: He was a 2.5 UZR. The worst C that year was Mike Stanley at -9.3.

I could buy his argument about trading Wieters to get wins in other areas, since I like to think that way sometimes, but Clevenger is probably not an answer here. Defense or no.

And I think Wieters has enough of a bat and glove and arm to justify what he will likely make next year. He's not a guy I want long-term, as he'll probably be in a wheelchair by 32 (which didn't stop Jason Giambi). But he's pretty important to the offense all things considered. The plight of being a switch-hitting catcher is you get to play more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And Chris Hoiles was the worst defensive C in baseball in 1996. :rolleyestf: He was a 2.5 UZR. The worst C that year was Mike Stanley at -9.3.

They didnt make the world series, either. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Plenty of teams still overvalue catchers, so Wieters would have plenty of suitors. Wieters would be cheaper than McCann, so the Braves could be interested.

You base this on what? What you pulled out of your service entrance? at 30 with some injury issues recently I doubt McCann gets more than 10 M per as a FA. Wieters will get about 7 M. So the Braves will give up a couple of top SP prospects in order to save 3 M? :rofl: Who else did you have in mind besides them.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I could buy his argument about trading Wieters to get wins in other areas, since I like to think that way sometimes, but Clevenger is probably not an answer here. Defense or no.

And I think Wieters has enough of a bat and glove and arm to justify what he will likely make next year. He's not a guy I want long-term, as he'll probably be in a wheelchair by 32 (which didn't stop Jason Giambi). But he's pretty important to the offense all things considered. The plight of being a switch-hitting catcher is you get to play more.

Nothing wrong with trading Wieters but who are you trading him to, and what are you getting in return? If you can't answer that, there's no point in even bringing it up. You might as well say lets trade Manny, we could get every thing we need to get to the WS for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Plenty of teams still overvalue catchers, so Wieters would have plenty of suitors. Wieters would be cheaper than McCann, so the Braves could be interested.

I hate to say it, but another team that would make sense is the Yankees. They always view themselves as contenders and have a hole there right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Baumann is a huge risk, more than Wells.  His stock has shot up after his time in Bowie last year.  I am a big dynasty player, and Prospects Live has him as their 264th overall player, and Wells isn't listed.  Prospects1500 has Baumann as our 10th prospect, and Wells as our 17th.  MLB Pipeline has Baumann 10th and Wells 20th.  He has a lot more upside than Wells IMO.   Pop has the TJS recovery but a two-pitch reliever who was a lock-down guy in AA is a worthwhile risk for the Rule 5 draft, especially with 26 man rosters now.  If I were a GM, I'd rather take the chance on a guy like Pop who could be a very good high-leverage reliever over a guy who might be a back-end starter/long reliever.  
    • Well, you listed six, I listed six, so that could work. I’m not sure Pop is a risk to get picked, given that he had TJ and didn’t really have any post-recovery time to do game work. I would certainly choose Wells if I were the Pirates or the Rangers, because they both need pitching really badly. Not sure how risky the others would be. That’s worthy of a separate post.
    • Guys who could be exposed to the Rule 5 draft if not added to the 40 man roster:   Baumann, Lowther, Wells, Mattson, Hanifee, Pop.   (There’s a few others who have no risk of being picked.).  How many of those get added determines how many need to be removed (more or less; right now we have 20 pitchers on the 40 man and I’d expect it to stay at about that number).   
    • Ace is like top 5 to me. You pretty much expect to win every night no matter who you are facing. Bieber, Cole, Verlander, Degrom, Scherzer. Outside of those guys I can't think of any I would call Ace nowadays. Top 20 would be so called Number 1's but not every Number 1 is an Ace, IMO. 
    • He could always just make it who won a World Series last. Or who has the worst announcers. 
    • The Braves Reds series what I am most interested.  The Reds have Bauer and Gray 1-2 which is tough draw.  Bauer will try to pitch game 1 and 3 if it were up to him. The Braves have amazing offense so should be good matchup Reds starters vs the Braves power.  The Reds May have the worst offense to be in playoffs.  
    • I’m a little stricter.   I want a TOR to be worthy of a top 2 spot in a decent rotation over at least a few years.    Not that he has to perform to no. 2 standards every single year, but most of the time.   When I think of a TOR, John Lackey and AJ Burnett come to mind.    Maybe a little lower down than that is still TOR.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...