Jump to content
jamalshw

Is it too early to plan for 2014?

Recommended Posts

The Orioles went to the ALCS twice with probably the worst defensive catchers in baseball. The catcher position is valuable, but Wieters is not irreplaceable.
The question isn't if Wieters is irreplaceable, though you have no way of establishing his true value to the team. The question is what team needs an upgrade in C enough to take on his salary, give up good prospects, as well as a pick? If as you say C is so easily replaceable why would any team want to give up much for him? Which team did you have in mind? I love these nebulous trade proposals that don't take into consideration the potential market and return. :rolleyestf:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Orioles went to the ALCS twice with probably the worst defensive catchers in baseball. The catcher position is valuable, but Wieters is not irreplaceable.

2012 - Posey

2011 - Molina

2010 - Posey

2009 - Posada

You notice a tend for the last four WS winning rosters?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The drop off wouldn't be as large as you would think as other teams with catchers not named Matt Wieters are in the playoffs. You make up the value elsewhere.

Just to be clear. You think, a guy who was a throw-in in a roster dump of two players should be the starting catcher on a playoff contending team?

I like Clevenger but you are extremely over-valuing him. And assuming that Buck would put up with his poor defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just to be clear. You think, a guy who was a throw-in in a roster dump of two players should be the starting catcher on a playoff contending team?

I like Clevenger but you are extremely over-valuing him. And assuming that Buck would put up with his poor defense.

I think Duquette targeted Clevenger. And I'd platoon him with a veteran backup anyway but Buck wouldn't have many other options so he'd be forced to play him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The question isn't if Wieters is irreplaceable, though you have no way of establishing his true value to the team. The question is what team needs an upgrade in C enough to take on his salary, give up good prospects, as well as a pick? If as you say C is so easily replaceable why would any team want to give up much for him? Which team did you have in mind? I love these nebulous trade proposals that don't take into consideration the potential market and return. :rolleyestf:

Plenty of teams still overvalue catchers, so Wieters would have plenty of suitors. Wieters would be cheaper than McCann, so the Braves could be interested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Duquette targeted Clevenger. And I'd platoon him with a veteran backup anyway but Buck wouldn't have many other options so he'd be forced to play him.

Clevenger has a .587 OPS against opposite-handed pitching.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2012 - Posey

2011 - Molina

2010 - Posey

2009 - Posada

You notice a tend for the last four WS winning rosters?

And Chris Hoiles was the worst defensive C in baseball in 1996. :rolleyestf: He was a 2.5 UZR. The worst C that year was Mike Stanley at -9.3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And Chris Hoiles was the worst defensive C in baseball in 1996. :rolleyestf: He was a 2.5 UZR. The worst C that year was Mike Stanley at -9.3.

I could buy his argument about trading Wieters to get wins in other areas, since I like to think that way sometimes, but Clevenger is probably not an answer here. Defense or no.

And I think Wieters has enough of a bat and glove and arm to justify what he will likely make next year. He's not a guy I want long-term, as he'll probably be in a wheelchair by 32 (which didn't stop Jason Giambi). But he's pretty important to the offense all things considered. The plight of being a switch-hitting catcher is you get to play more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And Chris Hoiles was the worst defensive C in baseball in 1996. :rolleyestf: He was a 2.5 UZR. The worst C that year was Mike Stanley at -9.3.

They didnt make the world series, either. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Plenty of teams still overvalue catchers, so Wieters would have plenty of suitors. Wieters would be cheaper than McCann, so the Braves could be interested.

You base this on what? What you pulled out of your service entrance? at 30 with some injury issues recently I doubt McCann gets more than 10 M per as a FA. Wieters will get about 7 M. So the Braves will give up a couple of top SP prospects in order to save 3 M? :rofl: Who else did you have in mind besides them.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I could buy his argument about trading Wieters to get wins in other areas, since I like to think that way sometimes, but Clevenger is probably not an answer here. Defense or no.

And I think Wieters has enough of a bat and glove and arm to justify what he will likely make next year. He's not a guy I want long-term, as he'll probably be in a wheelchair by 32 (which didn't stop Jason Giambi). But he's pretty important to the offense all things considered. The plight of being a switch-hitting catcher is you get to play more.

Nothing wrong with trading Wieters but who are you trading him to, and what are you getting in return? If you can't answer that, there's no point in even bringing it up. You might as well say lets trade Manny, we could get every thing we need to get to the WS for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Plenty of teams still overvalue catchers, so Wieters would have plenty of suitors. Wieters would be cheaper than McCann, so the Braves could be interested.

I hate to say it, but another team that would make sense is the Yankees. They always view themselves as contenders and have a hole there right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • 60, again, with the Blue Jays still playing their home games in Buffalo because Canada still won't be allowing anybody in from the United States.
    • The Baltimore Orioles will not win the World Series in 2020. This is how the Orioles might win the World Series next year (2021) 1. Trevor Bauer (SP) - $35 million. The biggest need for the Orioles a TOR starter.  Bauer is the best FA pitcher on the market, and will command a large contract.  2. DJ LeMahieu (2B/3B) - $15 million.   Would have to decide whether it makes more sense to have LeMaheiu at third and Alberto at second or vice versa. 3. Alex Colome (CP) - $10 million.  While the Orioles bullpen did performances, there was a real problem with closer.   Colome fulfills this need.   Rotation: 1. Bauer 2. Means 3. Cobb 4/5 Two of Akin/Kremer/Eschelman Bullpen: Lakins/Scott/Armstrong/Fry CP: Colome Lineup: C  Two of Severino/Sisco/Rustchman 1B Mancini 2B LeMahieu SS Iglesias 3B Alberto LF Mountcastle/Stewart CF Hays/Mullins RF Santander DH - platoon of Stewart/Severino/Sisco/etc.                
    • You're welcome! Thanks for stopping by.
    • I was going to ask what makes him toolsy besides the power but Hoosiers post suggests he has speed and can go get the ball.  Sounds like the arm is average at best.  Is there any chance he's a potential CF?
    • I went for more accomplised over shiny new thing, so Bannon/Zimmerman.  However, something about Stauffer intrigues me, age, size, K's, under the radar. His is the only name I was surprised to see in the poll so I kinda hope it's him.
    • What TV revenue? The TV networks pay what they pay for postseason games.   National coverage of regular season games does nothing but fill air time and gets very low ratings.   In a typical season a nationally televised NFL preseason game will get higher ratings than nearly any regular season MLB game.   Fox & TBS pays MLB for the All Star Game and the postseason, they would probably not care if they didn't broadcast any regular season games because no one watches them.   Most baseball fans watch their local team every day.   ESPN is the same except that they do need something to fill programming hours on their networks so they have a little more motivation to broadcast regular season games.   But for the most part, the national TV contracts exist for the postseason.   And MLB knows it so they will try to have as short a season possible because they know Fox & company will still ante up almost as much.   Cut the season in half and Fox will still pay 90% of what they pay now because all they really want is to broadcast the big games in October. Yes, the local TV revenue exists.   Except in a lot of cases (Balt/Wash, NYY, Bos, many others) it's a team owned network paying the team for the games, so it's just a paper transaction. A higher chunk of MLB revenue comes from actual attendance than any other major sport.   So it's the one sport where the owners have a strong motivation for a shorter season.  
    • I disagree that he's so important that a team would have to overpay for him to be dealt.  He's still pretty much the same guy the O's got on the cheap last year. Anyway, bad defense encourages the pitchers to strike batters out!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...