Jump to content
Can_of_corn

Johnson Part of the Core

Recommended Posts

I'm not thrilled about the salary he's going to command in arbitration, but he's still far and away the best choice for closer we have.

Johnson gave up 3 more runs this year than year. That's right...3 runs! The difference between last year and this year is that he gave up his runs conveniently last year. That's just the way it breaks sometimes, and I'm certainly glad to have him closing games for us. I just don't like the price tag.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Then who would you pitch in the 6th, 7th, and 8th? TJ and Stinson?

The question to me is whether it is this year or last year that is the anomaly for JJ. He had a couple years when he was lights out as our top setup guy, and 2012 as one of the top closers in the league (despite unconventional stuff). I happen to think 2013 was an off year, due to a combination of overuse and bad luck, and his true value is probably somewhere in between.

One thing I really didn't like about JJ this year was his fielding. At 9 million a year, if that's what it turns out to be, I want someone who can field the position. He let a bunch of lead runners get on due to fielding mistakes in pressure situations and to me that indicates mental weakness.

The only anomoly is when he allowed his runs. He could have the same ERA and WHIP next year and have a save rate of 90% if the runs come at different times. I have a lot of confidence in JJ's mental toughness. Sometimes, things just happen at the wrong times. Make no mistake, JJ is highly likely to be a better alternative (money aside) than anyone else in the organization or anyone we could acquire as a free agent. It's all about the money, and whether you'd pick up more wins spending it elsewhere than you'd lose from downgrading the back of your bullpen.

PS - I see crissfan72 made the same points as I was typing this.

Edited by Frobby
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who here would sign a starting pitcher coming off a 228 IP, 2.68 ERA season to a 1 yr/$9M contract?

Because those are Jim Johnson's aggregate numbers over the past 3 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The only anomoly is when he allowed his runs. He could have the same ERA and WHIP next year and have a save rate of 90% if the runs come at different times. I have a lot of confidence in JJ's mental toughness. Sometimes, things just happen at the wrong times. Make no mistake, JJ is highly likely to be a better alternative (money aside) than anyone else in the organization or anyone we could acquire as a free agent. It's all about the money, and whether you'd pick up more wins spending it elsewhere than you'd lose from downgrading the back of your bullpen.

PS - I see crissfan72 made the same points as I was typing this.

Is the money now an aside? Because, again, if it is sign me up for Johnson. As far as I know we have the same owner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is the money now an aside? Because, again, if it is sign me up for Johnson. As far as I know we have the same owner.

Money is not an aside. I'm just trying to separate the argument that we have a better (or cheaper, but nearly equally good) alternative at closer than JJ (we don't) from the argument that the money we'll spend on JJ is better spent elsewhere (which may be correct).

Edited by Frobby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Who here would sign a starting pitcher coming off a 228 IP, 2.68 ERA season to a 1 yr/$9M contract?

Because those are Jim Johnson's aggregate numbers over the past 3 years.

Bad argument, because relievers have lower ERA's than starters. But add a run to that ERA and it's not a bad comparison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is you, me and a few other posters Trea. We also have guys blaming JJ for blowing the O's WS chances last year and playoff hopes this season.

I'm in on this too. 8MM for a closer is an inefficient use of money. Although, I think Johnson would probably get 8MM/yr on the open market, so a draft pick would be the ideal scenario. Could this not be what DD is thinking?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Who here would sign a starting pitcher coming off a 228 IP, 2.68 ERA season to a 1 yr/$9M contract?

Because those are Jim Johnson's aggregate numbers over the past 3 years.

That us a bad argument because a starter with those numbers would command more money than $9M. And as you said, are over 3 years. Not 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bad argument, because relievers have lower ERA's than starters. But add a run to that ERA and it's not a bad comparison.

True. Johnson's WHIP is 1.127 over the same period, and those are not affected by the same ERA effect. Here's a complete list of starters with a 1.10-1.15 WHIP in one season over the past 3 years.

David Price 2013

Homer Bailey 2013

Travis Wood 2013

AJ Griffin 2013

Zack Greinke 2013

Felix Hernandez 2013

Andrew Cashner 2013

Bronson Arroyo 2013

Ervin Santana 2013

Scott Feldman 2013

Madison Bumgarner 2012

Cliff Lee 2012

Cole Hamels 2012

Gio Gonzalez 2012

Chris Sale 2012

CC Sabathia 2012

Felix Hernandez 2012

Mike Minor 2012

Brandon McCarthy 2011

Alexi Ogando 2011

David Price 2011

Ricky Romero 2011

Tim Hudson 2011

Jordan Zimmermann 2011

Jeremy Hellickson 2011

Only 34 other (qualified) pitcher-seasons had a WHIP <1.10 in the past 3 years.

I think the point stands. Johnson is a reliever, and provides far less value because he pitches fewer innings. But his performance is up there with the very best in the game when you look at a reasonable sample size. And his slight decline this season doesn't change very much.

Another way to look at it: where would Johnson rank among potential free agent relievers? Here's a leaderboard for RHRPs. Would you rather have LaTroy Hawkins? Matt Lindstrom? Matt Belisle? Jesse Crain?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would rather roll the dice with Wright for 500K and use the 8.5 million saving elsewhere.
If they're going to raise payroll, then I guess I'm fine with Jim Johnson, but it really doesn't seem like good baseball economics to pay him even 7-8 mil imo.
It's all about the money, and whether you'd pick up more wins spending it elsewhere than you'd lose from downgrading the back of your bullpen.
Would you rather have LaTroy Hawkins? Matt Lindstrom? Matt Belisle? Jesse Crain?

I don't think it's worth spending the money on any of these guys if we aren't going to pay Johnson. There isn't that much of a savings. I'm in the camp that says we find a solution in house and spend the money elsewhere. Preferably in the rotation. Of course that comes with the caveat that payroll isn't significantly increased.

And I'll believe that when I see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Arrieta's problem was that he overthought things, and having 4 pitches to try to throw for strikes didn't help. Take away two of his pitches - the curve and change, have him just focus on his fastball and slider, and he could dominate IMO.

Funny, I always thought his curve was better than his slider.

I sort of agree with you, but I don't think Baltimore was the place for it to happen. And he seemed to get inside his own head too frequently, especially toward the end of his stint. I remember quite well how dominant he could be; I was at one of his starts where he matched a no-hitter with Jered Weaver for like 4 innings, looking pretty much unstoppable, and then crumbled like a cookie in the 5th. I just don't think he has the mental capacity to do it consistently, as a starter or a reliever. And lets not forget that he is absolutely awful at repeating his release point. He spikes way too many balls at random times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Funny, I always thought his curve was better than his slider.

I sort of agree with you, but I don't think Baltimore was the place for it to happen. And he seemed to get inside his own head too frequently, especially toward the end of his stint. I remember quite well how dominant he could be; I was at one of his starts where he matched a no-hitter with Jered Weaver for like 4 innings, looking pretty much unstoppable, and then crumbled like a cookie in the 5th. I just don't think he has the mental capacity to do it consistently, as a starter or a reliever. And lets not forget that he is absolutely awful at repeating his release point. He spikes way too many balls at random times.

Thread derailer! ;) Check out the Arrieta thread. I posted an article there regarding his outlook for next season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Say want you want about JJ but 100 saves in two seasons is not to be sneezed at. :clap3::2yay-thumb::boogie::vader:

I have been upset at times this year with him but I wanted him back. He is our best option by far and I don't his money is costing us elsewhere. We aren't going after a top FA anyway. I guess if you argue it costs us Feldman, a new LF and or a DH then you could make your case but I don't think it does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Minor League Depth Chart

2021 Prospect Power Rankings

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • By the way, if I thought we were going to actually win something this year I'd be willing to ride Means into the ground like a rented donkey. But we're not, so what's the point?
    • I quit a while ago.  Best thing I ever did.  Thanks for your concern though. I'm not sure if it was called the Verducci effect, but there was pretty prominent study done ~15 years ago, which suggested that large innings spikes can lead to injury.  And then basically every team in baseball began developing their pitchers in a pretty uniform way in regards to innings counts. I concede there was nothing concrete then.  I'd be curious to know how it was "debunked." How many times with your own eyes have you seen some pitcher- in a postseason, in a regular season, as a prospect- pitch a lot more innings than normal and have residual effects? I think it's common sense wisdom.  Just as not smoking is. As far as your evaluation of Means, I agree with that whole-heartedly.  "Low stress innings."  "Low pitch counts."  "Few baserunners." Sounds exactly like a guy who is about to pitch a whole lot of innings.  Like over six per start.  Which if you run him out there every fifth day adds up to about...... 210 innings.
    • I'm not sure I've seen him hit a ground ball. He lifts everything. Before he K'd in one AB tonight, he hit a foul ball that didn't miss being an opposite field HR by very much. I'd like to see him some more against some lefties....Bowie has faced very little LHP so far. 
    • If your starting catcher is hitting 250 with I hr and 3 rbi he should be a very good defensive catcher, Pedro is not. First inning he tried to trick Judge at two strikes with a curveball, Kremer hadn't thrown one in the inning, hung it, gone.
    • Easily?  220 leads the league as often as not these days.  I don't see him being that guy. What association is there?  You thinking about the debunked Verducci effect? Means' inning are pretty much all low stress innings.  He doesn't run up high pitch counts or allow a bunch of base runners  For the record I think they have found actual evidence about smoking and cancer, so you might want to quit if you smoke.
    • Last year the O’s signed 8 undrafted free agents, and 6 of them made the Shorebirds’ OD roster.   That’s fairly amazing.   Here’s how they’re doing: J.D. Mundy, 1B: .345/.457/.621, 2 HR, 7 RBI in 35 PA Dylan Harris, OF: .217/.394/.217, 0 HR, 5 RBI in 29 PA Thomas Girard, P: 3 G, 2.2 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 4 K’s Shane Davis, P: 2 G, 7.0 IP, 9 H, 3 R, 3 ER, 2 BB, 8 K’s Brandon Young, P: 2 G, 6.2 IP, 2 H, 2 R, 1 ER, 5 BB,10 K’s Ryan Watson, P: was listed on break camp roster but appears to be inactive        
    • I said it in the game thread on the 110 mph DP he started tonight, when he good, he's really really good! Then sometimes he drops his shoulder and slings it sidearm to 1B and  misses by a mile. He hits really good... sometimes...     He is what he is, for THIS team. And he's pretty cheap. And better than Rio.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...