Jump to content
Jonesy10

Just Keep on Winning the Series

Recommended Posts

o

12-3-1 over their last 16 series after taking 2 out of 3 from the Angels.

This really has been a remarkable run. The starting pitching has been amazing. If we could string together a run of 9 or 10 we would put this race out of reach right here. Go O's. I have to believe that 1/2 of our starting lineup is better than .230. We only have a couple of over-achievers offensively right now - Pearce (but he's cooled off), Cruz (but he's cooled off), Jones (but his ascent is sort of in line with his career progression). Compare that to the lack of productivity at 2B, C (oh yeah, we're missing Wieters for the whole year), 1B, and SS (this is a severe drop off from the Hardy production that we're used to).

I like our chances. If Ubaldo gets hot, and with the addition of Miller, the pitching can hold up. The offense has a lot of improvement left in the tank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't care less that they took the "series" from LAA. They lost the game and at the end of the day today's loss cost them in the standings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I couldn't care less that they took the "series" from LAA. They lost the game and at the end of the day today's loss cost them in the standings.

It's quite simple. If you keep winning series that is at least a .667 winning percentage. Name a single team in the majors with a win percentage that is that good. If the Jays can achieve that, then they deserve the division. But I can about 100% guarantee they won't. In fact, their July win % which you seem so concerned about, is .576; not even close to that pace.

Want to guess what the O's win % was for this month? ::Hint:: It's greater than .667

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I couldn't care less that they took the "series" from LAA. They lost the game and at the end of the day today's loss cost them in the standings.

You can't win 162 games, you keep winning 2 out of 3 and things will be just fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I couldn't care less that they took the "series" from LAA. They lost the game and at the end of the day today's loss cost them in the standings.

I actually agree with this, to an extent.

You all know that I am the king of the "One game at a time" philosophy, so I am upset with the latest loss ...... regardless of the fact that we won the overall series.

However ...... in hindsight, I think that it's a good thing that the Orioles took the series, and that they have gone 12-3-1 over their last 16 series.

That's (obviously) a very big reason why the Orioles are currently sitting in first place in the division, as they have gone 32-20 in those 16 series ...... that's a .615 winning percentage over almost 1/3 of the season (52 games.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I actually agree with this, to an extent.

You all know that I am the king of the "One game at a time" philosophy, so I am upset with the latest loss ...... regardless of the fact that we won the overall series.

However ...... in hindsight, I think that it's a good thing that the Orioles took the series, and that they have gone 12-3-1 over their last 16 series.

That's (obviously) a very big reason why the Orioles are currently sitting in first place in the division, as they have gone 32-20 in those 16 series ...... that's a .615 winning percentage over almost 1/3 of the season (52 games.)

32-20 is why they sit atop the AL east, not the 12-3-1 in series. You can change the series record to be better or worse and the Orioles could still be 32-20 over that stretch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's quite simple. If you keep winning series that is at least a .667 winning percentage. Name a single team in the majors with a win percentage that is that good. If the Jays can achieve that, then they deserve the division. But I can about 100% guarantee they won't. In fact, their July win % which you seem so concerned about, is .576; not even close to that pace.

Want to guess what the O's win % was for this month? ::Hint:: It's greater than .667

I never implied that at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32-20 is why they sit atop the AL east, not the 12-3-1 in series. You can change the series record to be better or worse and the Orioles could still be 32-20 over that stretch.

You're splitting heirs with a person that agrees with you, and I've stated why.

At worst ..... if the Orioles had been swept in all 3 of their series losses, and if they had not swept any of their 12 series wins (neither of which is true), the Orioles still would have gone 29-23.

At best ...... they could have gone 47-5.

So what ???

Winning series over a long period of time requires that a team win AT LEAST 2 out of 3 games, or AT LEAST 3 out of 4 games.

And no matter how you slice that, if a team wins an overwhelming amount of series over a long period of time (such as the Orioles going 12-3-1 in 16 consecutive series), it will result in a record that is well above .500.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We win another series and the Jays are already falling off the pace. See how nicely this works?

If Houston's lead holds up, it will mean despite playing the likes of Boston, Texas, and Houston since the second half started while we have played Oakland, Anaheim 2x, and Seattle 2x that Toronto will have gained a half game. I know we're not hitting but that makes me smile. I think we're gonna show them who the leaders of the AL East are this week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We win another series and the Jays are already falling off the pace. See how nicely this works?

They won today and increased the lead to 5 in the loss column. See how nicely this works too?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Bananas are yellow right?       https://www.crayola.com/explore-colors/banana-mania.aspx  
    • So, by your post above, you agree that the Iglesias trade does fit into what we'd expect Elias to be doing ("building inventory"), correct? As for free agents, I can imagine him wanting to spend BIG in a place where he might not think we have answers during a competitive period. So at SS or 2B, for example, I'd expect he might hold off on a big name guy because he might think we have our own big name guys 2-3 years away, so the paying part wouldn't make sense re: a competitive team. Same for 3B, outfield, catcher and even pitcher. I honestly think that 90% of what he's doing is consistent with what I would expect him to do given a complete rebuild. The one part I agree with is the opportunity to take on bigger contracts in exchange for more prospects. I too wish we'd go that route. I think the next level example of that is signing a guy like Cobb (e.g., more expensive than Iglesias) and hoping for performance so you can trade him. I think the cost/risk equation there gets a little out of hand though. 
    • OH ... 15.5 ... Thanks for helping make my point 🍺
    • I live in a world where you prove you deserve a promotion. Producing at your current role is the indicator. Most players produce less at the majors than they did in the minors....Notice I said most! Analytics helps and I'm happy we have them. But they stats are the stats and why think a guy is ready to do better at the majors than he's done at AA? .262 is pretty mediocre. What is it about Bowie that would lead you to believe that he'd do better at the majors. Scenario ..... its 2021 in July and Diaz is hitting .260/.315/750 at AA. Why do you think he'd be better against MLB pitching? Analystics? I'm pretty sure they are using the same data in the minors now right?
    • I agree with you and Frobby, circumstances rather than any actual numbers threshold. And I think the bolded is the best and simplest way to phrase it. Next man up.
    • But it was my thought!  Lol. Going forward, I will think it and Jerios will post it.
    • I care about the clock, but only to an extent.    I wouldn’t hold anyone back until 2022 if they are ready at mid-2021.    But, I wouldn’t start someone in the majors on Opening Day even if they were ready.    Particularly as to Rutschman, I feel like catchers only have so many years in their legs and I wouldn’t spend one of those years in the minors if they’re ready for the majors.  I am not saying, sight unseen, that he is ready, despite some of the hype we’ve heard lately.  But let’s say it’s late June and it’s very evident he is ready — at that point, I’d like to see him getting major league experience.   Is that “wasted” in a losing season?   I don’t think so, because it hastens the time when he’ll be at the peak of experience and physical ability.      
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...