Jump to content
Frobby

This is nothing compared to 1969

Recommended Posts

Let me say, I've been traveling overseas and didn't see the last two games, or much of the first two. And while I'm annoyed to lose to a team I KNOW in my heart isn't as good as us, in four games no less, I've lived through far worse postseason disasters, especially watching the 1969 loss to the Mets. 45 years and that still stings beyond belief. This season, on the other hand, was a great one that I will look back on fondly despite the rout by the Royals. And wait 'till next year!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let me say, I've been traveling overseas and didn't see the last two games, or much of the first two. And while I'm annoyed to lose to a team I KNOW in my heart isn't as good as us, in four games no less, I've lived through far worse postseason disasters, especially watching the 1969 loss to the Mets. 45 years and that still stings beyond belief. This season, on the other hand, was a great one that I will look back on fondly despite the rout by the Royals. And wait 'till next year!

Well said. And very true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We aren't better than the Royals without three starters in our lineup. We were better than the Mets and I agree with you about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Royals outplayed us in every facet of the game. They deserved to win. And it wasn't so much because we were so bad; they were so good.

We didn't hit the ball hard very frequently, but when we did someone was there to make a great play.

I attended Game 1 of the '69 series. I still can't believe we lost to the Mets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree this doesn't top '69, but I believe it is pretty far up the list. It feels worse to me than '96 or '97, but it can't top the World Series losses. Those all were heinous. The Orioles haven't been relevant for enough of my lifetime to have had that many playoff frustrations, but this is definitely the worst of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was born in '68 so '69 might as well been '39 for me. But the 1979 World Series was still worse than this. They blew a 3-1 lead for the World Championship and I can still hear that damn "We Are Family" in my head.

Hey, the Royals played great. They deserve to win it. Great pitching, great defense and opportunistic run scoring.

Here's to hoping Angelos and Duquette improve upon the 2014 team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1969 was in the World Series, ditto 1979 which was another extremely bitter loss. WADR to Frobby, who I doubt followed , and hung on, every game of 1969, unlike 2014, this one stings a lot more. I'd much rather lose in the World Series than this, but we don't get to make that decision.

P.S. I was in second grade in 1969, and I'd bet most fans here were not born yet ;)

Edited by TonySoprano

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I was about negative 18 or so in 69 but 1996 actually physically hurt. I was upset for days. There has been worse than this. There will be better than this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • How much of this can you put on the O-line and lack of separation by receivers?  I feel like he shoulders so much pressure with the "If I don't make the play, no one will" attitude, that yes he does tend to hold onto the ball too long instead of throwing it away.   What about the two HUGE drops by Dobbins wide open in space?  That first drop was game changing in my opinion.   People love the traditional stand back in the pocket and sling it everywhere QB.  Which is why everyone now loves Josh Allen.  People love to pile on Lamar for being 1-3 in the playoffs.  Josh Allen is 2-2.  Lamar has an MVP to his name at 24 (Josh played at an MVP level this year).  He was awful in that Chiefs playoff game.  I imagine Josh Allen will be looking to get paid this offseason as well.  Market shows he will be in the same 35-40 million dollar range, now that Watson signed the deal in Houston. Hard to say you are getting less than all of these other QB's that, in theory have produced equally, or less than Lamar has.  I get it and the thought process.  But, its either pay the man or risk being awful, while attempting to find your next franchise QB.     I pay the man.
    • A fanciful can to kick - contracts aside, from here would you rather have John Means or Chris Sale?
    • Dombrowski having gotten Realmuto to take his $$$ I guess has bowed out on Semien, and Twins beat guy reporting his team and Brewers possible  suitors.   I can get kicking Jorge Polanco, Orlando Arcia and Luis Urias all off SS island, though with Lewis coming I guess Minnesota hoping for 2B like Red Sox did before Enrique.   Brewers and Twins would even give Galvis/Villar landing spots before us assuming OAK/PHI/CIN naturally ahead of us for the main three.    Galvis back to Philly seems likelier now.  
    • I think it was Bob Feller, who said of Dwight Gooden, “I would rather have his future than my past.“ Looking at today’s pitching environment, I would much rather have the future of our own guys, then hope for a continuation of the past of the other teams’ guys. I continue to think that pitching is going to be the least of our problems in this season.
    • The Bills were run-blitzing with zone coverage.  You actually can't play man vs Lamar.  He just takes off for 25 yards every time.   You also can't really screen with Lamar as your QB, because it doesn't work vs run-blitzes, and they never do normal blitzes like they would vs Aaron Rodgers.  Lamar had a lot of success with short passes in the flat vs the Bills.  He threw 14 out of 22 non-throwaway passes less than 5 air yards from scrimmage. (this was calculated by me watching, so it might not correlate with any published stats)  He completed 10 of them, 1 was dropped, and 3 were off-target (1 was from a bad snap.) I think they attacked the Bills correctly up until the interception.  And then on the very next play he got knocked out of the game because our OL had their worst game of the season.  If Lamar stayed in the game I think the Ravens could have maybe made it interesting.
    • So I think that there are 2 extreme camps among sports fans regarding key talent: one side wants nothing more than to keep all homegrown talent, completely blind to their faults, and the other side wants nothing more than to blow everything up every 2 years because everyone sucks.  Being honest with myself, I lean toward the first camp, and I was wrong about wanting to keep Flacco after he won us a super bowl.  I'd like to think that in the future I won't hold unhealthy nostalgia for questionable players, but one can never be certain.   That said, I think that the fact that we're even debating the talent/skill level of a player that won an MVP as a 22 year old QB is insane.  Straight up insane.  Yet here we are.  Don't take this as me believing that this debate is not without merit.  It is.  But Flacco had the benefit of proving that he wasn't worth the contract.  It's not fair to assume that Lamar, who has been by far the superior player in the regular season, won't be worth a contract just because Flacco wasn't.  And given Lamar's age even a lengthy extension isn't going to take him past 28 or 29.  That's more or less the same age that Flacco was after he won the Super Bowl.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...