Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
PressBoxOnline

Orioles' Starting Rotation Faces Depth Problem In 2016

Recommended Posts

I think we'll add a vet SP in FA to replace Chen. Wright will be moved to the pen. Wilson will stay stretched out in AAA. DD will focus on the SP depth when he does he depth signings for the milb. Guys know that if they sign with us they will get a chance. So hopefully we can get the top SP types that are willing to sign minor league deals with ST invites. Of course we won't have "prospect" depth. But we should have Wilson, Gunkel, Bridwell, Miranda all in the mix for AAA. With Hess in AA and a hopefully healthy Bundy and Harvey in the mix somewhere in the upper minors. A healthy Bundy and Harvey changes everything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think we'll add a vet SP in FA to replace Chen. Wright will be moved to the pen. Wilson will stay stretched out in AAA. DD will focus on the SP depth when he does he depth signings for the milb. Guys know that if they sign with us they will get a chance. So hopefully we can get the top SP types that are willing to sign minor league deals with ST invites. Of course we won't have "prospect" depth. But we should have Wilson, Gunkel, Bridwell, Miranda all in the mix for AAA. With Hess in AA and a hopefully healthy Bundy and Harvey in the mix somewhere in the upper minors. A healthy Bundy and Harvey changes everything.

Bundy will have no options left, so he will be in the bullpen or on the DL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was dead set against Britton getting stretched out in ST and given a SP assignment in the rotation.

But, with Chen gone, Wright looking more like a reliever, Bundy & Harvey injuries and not ready for prime time, yet, it's starting to look more and more like it might not be a bad thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just can't see DD doing anything of note to address the rotation. Hope I'm wrong but Maybe since he's not planning his exit to Toronto maybe he will do something, anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was dead set against Britton getting stretched out in ST and given a SP assignment in the rotation.

But, with Chen gone, Wright looking more like a reliever, Bundy & Harvey injuries and not ready for prime time, yet, it's starting to look more and more like it might not be a bad thing.

I have been having the same thought, too, but very mixed feelings. One thing that would convince me is one or two examples of guys with similar stuff - sinker and occasional "get me over" slider - who have been successful as a starter. I think this has been asked before but I don't every remember seeing an answer. I do think he has been so good as a reliever that it is not hard to imagine him being at least decent as a starter. Then again, I love having a dependable guy at the back end of the bullpen and there is something to be said for "don't fix what ain't broke".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would love to see a big FA starter signed that doesn't cost a pick. The prices for those guys though is going to be astronomical. I don't see it happening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just can't see DD doing anything of note to address the rotation. Hope I'm wrong but Maybe since he's not planning his exit to Toronto maybe he will do something, anything.
I would love to see a big FA starter signed that doesn't cost a pick. The prices for those guys though is going to be astronomical. I don't see it happening.

Last off season, DD was on top of the world, so much so that Toronto came calling. This off season, DD has to do something to protect his resume. If he does nothing of note, three things can happen:

(1) he can claim rebuilding, which may be the best recourse for him but requires more unpopular moves

(2) he can claim incompetence, which ruins his fragile rep as a comeback GM

(3) he can claim he's handcuffed by the owner, which burns more bridges

I'm pretty confident with so much room on the payroll that someone or two will be signed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Has to be. He ran MASN well before Peter had his health issues to begin with.     Elias is baseball ops.
    • I could see Stewart around there though I could also see his average stay lower. I agree on the floor because I'm a little concerned over the fact he didn't hit at all outside of that 9-game Barry Bonds-like streak.  Stewart though is one of the guys I'm going to see what I got in 2021. There is a chance he's a .340 WOBA/.800 OPS guy and like you said, while he's cheap, there's value in that at DH.
    • Baseball is an unusual situation where long-term guaranteed contracts are an option.  Davis is a worst-case scenario in this unusual situation.  The owners can't complain.  They're the ones who offered the contract.  Angelos could have insisted the O's operate differently, he could have refused to sign anyone to a long-term deal.  Actually, for years we heard rumors that Angelos wouldn't sign a pitcher to long-term contract because he didn't believe anyone who pitched every five days was worth it.  But in this case he didn't, in fact we're pretty sure the owner intervened and insisted on a contract the GM and others thought was risky and unwise. Note that the Rays never are screaming about having to eat the last three years of a long, expensive contract. I'm guessing that if my employer offered me a seven-year guaranteed contract for me to do a job that everyone knew I probably wouldn't be able to do well at some point in the deal, I wouldn't be rushing to give back the money. In all of this I think baseball would be better off with a contract structure more like soccer.  Where at any point in time anyone can come in a offer up a transfer fee for any player, the teams work out a deal for rights, the player and the new team work out a contract, and that's that.  Because there's no six years of pre-free agency and no delaying big money until a player is in decline, you have mostly fair deals.  When a guy hits his 30s he's very rarely going to be signed to a monster contract.  He already got his money when he was in his early-to-mid 20s, so there's no incentive to sign a 27- or 29-year-old to a stupid contract, and teams allocate money to the valuable, younger players.  Not the old, declining players.  Baseball has hung itself on free agency rules mostly devised in the 1970s.
    • Depends on how you frame it. It guarantees at all times a 4 man bench. Limits 13 pitchers. Occasionally in past you would see teams flip a position player for an arm and go with a 13 man staff.    I personally hope they keep expanded rosters (say 27) in the future with pitching limited to 13. It adds more strategy late in games to the offensive side.  
    • I doubt Elias plays any role in these hirings so is this on John A.?
    • I don’t think it is common but we know about it because of top tier talents.    Longoria in 08 with Rays and Bryant in 15 with Cubs. The headline players stand out. Teams aren’t tying to do this with marginal talents.  
    • To me  the addition of a 26th man adds a reliever not a position player.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...