Jump to content
Old#5fan

Wayne Kirby's Outfield Positioning (A rant thread)

Recommended Posts

You always try to cheat the margins. Someone has to be the smart guy in the room. Unless you are conceding it is someone other than you, case reopened.

Maybe so but psychologically if I am a pitcher and I see Kirby placing both corner outfielders in the power alleys I would view that as no confidence in my ability to handle the hitter. And then when the hitter bloops a sure out that falls in that should have been an easy out with normal positioning it would surely irritate the crap out of me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is interesting, but let's be fair. If you don't like the positioning, it's on Buck. I am relatively certain that he can see where the OF is positioned and if he didn't like it I am pretty sure he would mention it to Kirby.

I'm not saying I agree of disagree with the original post, just saying I believe it is a decision that has been made at the top.

Probably so - good point. I think Kirby likely does have a lot of leeway though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I may be alone in this as I am more of an old school baseball fan but I would much rather see Kirby cease his standard positioning of the corner outfielders in the power alley or gaps. Last night was a perfect example of the stupidity of it.

He had Richard playing in essentially left center and the hitter doesn't get around on Tillman's fastball which seemed to have decent movement and bloops a very high pop up that even a slow left fielder playing a normal left field position easily catches....

I would much rather take my chances of getting beat by a ball hammered up the gap than a stupid bloop that should have been an easy out.

You are not alone. I can't believe I'm in agreement with you, but I've been saying this for some time. All position players should be placed depending on the pitcher and the hitter. I wouldn't call the positioning the Orioles do with their OF a shift either. It's their normal positioning.

And it isn't working.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are not alone. I can't believe I'm in agreement with you, but I've been saying this for some time. All position players should be placed depending on the pitcher and the hitter. I wouldn't call the positioning the Orioles do with their OF a shift either. It's their normal positioning.

And it isn't working.

I could at least understand it when a pitcher is running out of gas or getting hit hard, but not as you also state as their normal positioning most of the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is the OF should be positioning themselves from pitch to pitch according to the next pitch and the hitter's tendencies. Like the old days with guys like Mays and Blair doing it. But they don't do that now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a fan, it's very frustrating when a ball that would be catchable from a "standard" spot isn't caught by a fielder who is in some kind of a shift. It stands out because, when you first see the ball come off the bat, you assume it will be caught, and then when it isn't, it's very aggravating.

That said, the O's have a ton of data on where guys hit the ball, and I have little doubt that their positioning takes away more hits than it gives up, compared to standard positioning. So, I'm willing to live with the occasional fluky result, even if it is annoying to witness it when it occurs, like Moreland's bloop hit on Thursday night.

As an aside, I think the infield shift was as much of a cause of that Moreland hit dropping in as the outfield shift was. Either Hardy or Manny could have gotten to that Moreland bloop from a normal infield position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As a fan, it's very frustrating when a ball that would be catchable from a "standard" spot isn't caught by a fielder who is in some kind of a shift. It stands out because, when you first see the ball come off the bat, you assume it will be caught, and then when it isn't, it's very aggravating.

That said, the O's have a ton of data on where guys hit the ball, and I have little doubt that their positioning takes away more hits than it gives up, compared to standard positioning. So, I'm willing to live with the occasional fluky result, even if it is annoying to witness it when it occurs, like Moreland's bloop hit on Thursday night.

As an aside, I think the infield shift was as much of a cause of that Moreland hit dropping in as the outfield shift was. Either Hardy or Manny could have gotten to that Moreland bloop from a normal infield position.

Statcast takes defensive shifts from being an art to being a science. Teams not only know where a batter is likely to hit the ball but how long it takes their fielder to get to that spot to make a play.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kirby's outfield positioning is an extension of the relatively recent trend in baseball. (The Shift)

You could call it a trend... you could call it a fad... or you could shake your fist at it, and call it one of those "newfangled nuisances that are ruining the game". Whatever your opinion on the subject is, one this is certain... it will change. Trends in baseball are like a big lumbering ship. Someone decides to steer a new course, and it slowly catches on. "The shift" is becoming pervasive because it devalues predictable hitters (and pull hitters in particular). The trend will continue until predictable hitters are devalued, and greater emphasis is put on place hitting... at which time the rudder will be turned the other way, and the long slow turn of baseball will move in the other direction. (i.e. value of the shift will be diminished)

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While complaining of the occasional ball that falls in that MAY have been caught without the "Shift" there is a need to look at the runs/hits prevented by the positioning aspect of th "Shift". Those go unnoticed by most.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kirby's outfield positioning is an extension of the relatively recent trend in baseball. (The Shift)

You could call it a trend... you could call it a fad... or you could shake your fist at it, and call it one of those "newfangled nuisances that are ruining the game". Whatever your opinion on the subject is, one this is certain... it will change. Trends in baseball are like a big lumbering ship. Someone decides to steer a new course, and it slowly catches on. "The shift" is becoming pervasive because it devalues predictable hitters (and pull hitters in particular). The trend will continue until predictable hitters are devalued, and greater emphasis is put on place hitting... at which time the rudder will be turned the other way, and the long slow turn of baseball will move in the other direction. (i.e. value of the shift will be diminished)

Cy Williams hit into a shift in the 1920's. I'm not sure how much of a fad the shift is at this point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The problem is the OF should be positioning themselves from pitch to pitch according to the next pitch and the hitter's tendencies. Like the old days with guys like Mays and Blair doing it. But they don't do that now.

Right. Spot on as a matter of fact!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cy Williams hit into a shift in the 1920's. I'm not sure how much of a fad the shift is at this point.

FAD:a thing that becomes very popular in a short amount of time, and then is forgotten at about the same speed. :

The shift used to be unusual.

Now it is ubiquitous.

My contention is not that no one used to ever play the shift. Only that until recently, it had been unusual in the modern game. And that as hitters adjust by place hitting rather than dead-pulling... it will become unusual again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FAD:a thing that becomes very popular in a short amount of time, and then is forgotten at about the same speed. :

The shift used to be unusual.

Now it is ubiquitous.

My contention is not that no one used to ever play the shift. Only that until recently, it had been unusual in the modern game. And that as hitters adjust by place hitting rather than dead-pulling... it will become unusual again.

Yeah sort of easy to predict eventually when these shifts are the norm for years someone is going to come along and either start playing everyone straight up or slightly moved depending on whether a right handed or left handed batter and be hailed as an innovator or genius - LOL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah sort of easy to predict eventually when these shifts are the norm for years someone is going to come along and either start playing everyone straight up or slightly moved depending on whether a right handed or left handed batter and be hailed as an innovator or genius - LOL.

Too bad neither you or I will live to see that. They have this newfangled stat cast thing And iPADs (another gadget) in the dugouts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • It would be cheaper and possibly more efficient to just buy the Rays.....
    • They will settle for no less than Rendon, Cole and Strasburg out of Cashman. Or maybe a trade for Lindor. 
    • I find Girardi annoying, but I think he was a good manager.    I think Boone has done a good job as well.    Those poor Yankee fans will have to live with 7 playoff appearances, 3 division titles and 4 ALCS appearances over the last decade.     And 27 straight winning seasons.   
    • All Roch said was, “I’d expect another catcher to join the organization, even if for depth purposes.“ I think it’s a foregone conclusion that we’ll add a catcher or two before spring training.    It doesn’t mean that whoever they acquire will slot above the players you named.    That will be sorted out in spring training.   
    • I feel like there were several seasons in the last decade where Girardi got more wins out of that team than he should have.  I can't remember which years, but there were a few.  I felt like he managed every game as if it was Game 7 of the WS, using Betances in every single medium to high leverage situation.  Even in spite of their payroll, there were a few years where the on-paper talent wasn't quite up to their normal standards....yet they still won a lot of games.  I think no matter who is managing, the Yankees will always have their fair share of players who outperform their norms simply by putting on that uniform.  This year was a little more pronounced, but we have seen other sports teams over the years have very high payrolls and still land under .500 because things just don't work out.  I think the 2012 Red Sox lost 90+ games and then won the WS the next year.  The Yankees never finish under .500, no matter what.  That is pretty impressive.
    • Everyone was a fan of Severino when he put up an 818 OPS in the first half.
    • The Surprise Saguaros clinched the AFL West title over the weekend.    It appears likely they’ll face the Salt River Rafters on Saturday for the League title.    If Kremer pitches today, he’ll be available to start the championship game, though I’m not sure he’d be chosen.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...