Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Ten days of WAR

Recommended Posts

It's kind of fascinating to look at WAR in a ten-game bite. The O's leadership so far (position players):

Machado 1.0

Trumbo 0.6

Hardy 0.5

Schoop 0.5

Davis 0.4

Reimold 0.3

I think this really points up how the season has ups and downs. A great player might be worth 5-7 WAR in a season, which is about 0.3-0.4 every 10 games. But the path there looks more like a stock market chart than it does like a straight line.

Of course, maybe Manny really will be worth 16 WAR this season. :D

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So according to this' date=' we would have won 3.3 more games than replacements? So replacements would have been 5-5 or 4-6? Is this the theory behind WAR?[/quote']

I forget the exact number but I think it's calibrated such that a team of replacement-level players would win 50 games or so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In fWAR, the Orioles are #2 for position players at 3.4, behind only the Cardinals at 3.6. Third place Rockies are only 2.5. We're also 7th in pitching at 1.7.

The Orioles are hitting .294/.357/.540 as a team, good for a 154 wRC+. That's simply outrageous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's kind of fascinating to look at WAR in a ten-game bite. The O's leadership so far (position players):

Machado 1.0 [0.1]

Trumbo 0.6 [-0.2]

Hardy 0.5 [0.4]

Schoop 0.5 [-0.4]

Davis 0.4 [0.2]

Reimold 0.3 [-0.1]

I think this really points up how the season has ups and downs. A great player might be worth 5-7 WAR in a season, which is about 0.3-0.4 every 10 games. But the path there looks more like a stock market chart than it does like a straight line.

WAR for the second 10 games in brackets above, kind of proving the point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

30 games:

Machado 2.3 (1.0, 0.1, 1.2)

Hardy 0.8 (0.5, 0.4, -0.1)

Reimold 0.8 (0.3, -0.1, 0.6)

Trumbo 0.7 (0.6, -0.2, 0.3)

Davis 0.5 (0.4, 0.2, -0.1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kind of amazing how easy it is to be worse than a AAA player for ten days.

And yet, people are jumping to conclusions about players after 10 or so games all the time around here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And yet, people are jumping to conclusions about players after 10 or so games all the time around here.

I thought my suggestion to build a Rickard statue and execute Pedro Alverez in front of it was fairly level headed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought my suggestion to build a Rickard statue and execute Pedro Alverez in front of it was fairly level headed.

But what about the back of their baseball cards?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So according to this' date=' we would have won 3.3 more games than replacements? So replacements would have been 5-5 or 4-6? Is this the theory behind WAR?[/quote']

http://www.baseball-reference.com/about/war_explained.shtml

http://www.fangraphs.com/library/misc/war/

Calculating WAR, especially for position players, is simpler than you’d think. If you want the detailed version with the precise steps and formulas, head to our page on Position Player WAR or Pitcher WAR. The short answer, though, is as follows:

● Position players – To calculate WAR for position players you want to take their Batting Runs, Base Running Runs, and Fielding Runs above average and then add in a positional adjustment, a small adjustment for their league, and then add in replacement runs so that we are comparing their performance to replacement level rather than the average player. After that, you simply take that sum and divide it by the runs per win value of that season to find WAR. The simple equation looks something like this:

WAR = (Batting Runs + Base Running Runs +Fielding Runs + Positional Adjustment + League Adjustment +Replacement Runs) / (Runs Per Win)

● Pitchers – While position player WAR is based on Batting Runs and Fielding Runs, pitching WAR uses FIP (with infield fly balls), adjusted for park, and scaled to how many innings the pitcher threw. FIP is translated into runs, converted to represent value above replacement level, and is then converted from runs to wins. This is a slightly more complicated process than for position players and there will be a new post detailing exactly how we do this in the next week or so (stay tuned!)

WAR is available in two places: FanGraphs (fWAR) and Baseball-Reference (rWAR or bWAR). Both statistics use the same framework and calculate replacement level the same, but use different methods for estimating offensive, defensive, and pitching value, so their results differ in some cases. Additionally, Baseball-Prospectus calculates WARP, which is the same idea by a different name. All of the information provided on these pages refers to fWAR, unless otherwise specified.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 games:

Machado 2.3 (1.0, 0.1, 1.2)

31 games: Machado 2.6. So, a homer, 2 singles and 2 walks in 5 PA will earn you about 0.3 WAR in a single game, if you are a SS and don't mess up in the field. I wonder what his 2-homer game on Sunday was worth?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • o   Zack Greinke will try for a reversal of fortune from Game One ........ Masahiro Tanaka will hope for more of the same.     (ALCS, Game Four) *****************     NEW YORK YANKEES Pending 田中 将大 - RHP )) (11-9, 4.45 ERA)   HOUSTON ASTROS Pending Donald Zachary Greinke - RHP )) (18-5, 2.93 ERA) ) *   * )) (10-4, 2.90 ERA) OOO [ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS] OOOOO (8-1, 3.02 ERA) OOO [HOUTON ASTROS]   https://www.baseballpress.com/lineups   o
    • Heard this little ditty tonight out of work.   Brand new.  
    • And tanking/not being good got them Harper, Strasburg, Rendon and a host of other talents.  Even if they win, it's a legit possibility that Rendon and Strasburg both depart via free agency, and without them, they've got a team that will hang a few games around .500, if they get the bullpen right. 
    • Yep, it's pretty clear what they are doing now. They're all in for this year which is a little weird, because I honestly don't think they are that great, but I guess this is the end of their run so might as well go for it!
    • That is where the accounting chicanery comes into play.  They still paying debt service on the money Angelos loaned the team?
    • I think this misrepresents the non-payroll expenses of the team.    Per Forbes, in 2018 the O’s had revenues of $251 mm, of which $42 mm were gate receipts.    The team reportedly had operating losses of $6.5 mm, and player expenses (salaries + benefits) of $161 mm.   So, that implies that other costs were $251 mm - $161 mm + $6.5 mm = $96.5 mm.    That’s more than paying trivial rent and a few coaches.      Extrapolating those numbers to this year, let’s assume non-gate revenue was flat, gate revenue was down proportionately to attendance (but it may have been worse), and player expenses were proportionate to payroll per BB-ref.   That leads to the following estimate:      Gate receipts $33.5 mm Other revenue: $209 mm Total revenue $242.5 mm Less: non-player expenses $96.5 mm Less: player expenses $94 mm  Net income:   $52.5 mm That’s probably too high, given that Elias has been investing in technology, infrastructure etc.   We’ll see what Forbes estimates next spring.     But certainly Elias had savings available to invest in other areas.
    • I am glad this OP was not around in the 1960s...1969-1971...average attendance was never even at 14,000 with the greatest teams of all time.  Guess what...still here.  I will love to look back on  this thread and some of these posts in three or four years when we are back in it.   And when we get back in it AND the Nats are a power team...maybe a true rivalry will exist and maybe even a Beltway Series.  A true rivalry will fire up new fans in both areas.  Either way, the Orioles are going nowhere. Not in 10 years, not in 15 years, not in 100 years.   No other location has Camden Yards, Babe Ruth’s birthplace, Cal, Frank, Brooks, Eddie, Earl and MLB is not going to leave this iconic ballpark and its tradition empty and abandoned to move to ummm Nashville...lol. My niece also is the agent now for Harbor East and other new downtown condos...they are as hot as anything in DC or anyplace else. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...