I don't know that I'd call a guy who's already a first baseman at 20/21 a strong #1. #1 is the best overall talent in the draft and he's already limited to 1B/DH as a pro. In my book a strong #1 is an up-the-middle fielder who can also hit a ton.
Not at all surprising that you're ranking Martin as a weak #2.
It's pretty dumb. Also dumb is the whole notion that saying someone was a better defender than Brooks Robinson is sacreligious. Now it's dumb to think that but the fact that people get so uppity when someone ventures to make that claim is obnoxious.