Jump to content
weams

For crying out loud, can MLB please implement an electronic strike zone already?

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

As opposed to actively sabotaging it?

I find it hard to believe this was a difficult sell.  We're going to have as many umps, we're going to pay you just as much, but we're going to give you a tool to not only do your job better but also one that gives you an iron-clad defense whenever an irate manager or fan confronts you about a bad ball/strike call. I guess there might be umps still in the employ of MLB who like the freedom to call obvious balls strikes and vice versa?

How are you supposed to punish players you don’t like and rookies who don’t “deserve” strike calls if you can’t rig the strike zone?     Maybe the computer can be pre-programmed to take care of that.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Frobby said:

How are you supposed to punish players you don’t like and rookies who don’t “deserve” strike calls if you can’t rig the strike zone?     Maybe the computer can be pre-programmed to take care of that.

Or what if it is a travel day and you are behind the plate and it's just over a hundred out there and you've got a plane to catch?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Or what if it is a travel day and you are behind the plate and it's just over a hundred out there and you've got a plane to catch?

But you won't get to complain about the Orioles catchers' abysmal framing abilities. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, atomic said:

But you won't get to complain about the Orioles catchers' abysmal framing abilities. 

Go ahead and find an example of me complaining about the O's abysmal framing abilities.

I'll wait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, atomic said:

But you won't get to complain about the Orioles catchers' abysmal framing abilities. 

This kind of raises an interesting point, which is taking away the skill of the catcher at framing as an element of the game.    Kind of sad to think of catchers who don’t hit well or throw well, but are adept at framing, suddenly being out on the street because their feature skill abruptly has no value. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Frobby said:

This kind of raises an interesting point, which is taking away the skill of the catcher at framing as an element of the game.    Kind of sad to think of catchers who don’t hit well or throw well, but are adept at framing, suddenly being out on the street because their feature skill abruptly has no value. 

There's that, but in an ideal world, there'd have been no need for framing in the first place.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Morgan423 said:

There's that, but in an ideal world, there'd have been no need for framing in the first place.

I agree with your point philosophically, but it’s still sort of sad to see some of the nuances of the game disappear.    Overall I’d rather get the calls right.   

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Frobby said:

This kind of raises an interesting point, which is taking away the skill of the catcher at framing as an element of the game.    Kind of sad to think of catchers who don’t hit well or throw well, but are adept at framing, suddenly being out on the street because their feature skill abruptly has no value. 

I group them with pitchers who are really good at scuffing the ball.

Is it is skill...sure.

Should it be a skill that is rewarded...debatable.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Or what if it is a travel day and you are behind the plate and it's just over a hundred out there and you've got a plane to catch?

Both managers can check a "big zone" option when they submit their lineup cards.  That's the day Tanner Scott gets 2 innings.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

This kind of raises an interesting point, which is taking away the skill of the catcher at framing as an element of the game.    Kind of sad to think of catchers who don’t hit well or throw well, but are adept at framing, suddenly being out on the street because their feature skill abruptly has no value. 

I hate framing. So there is that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I group them with pitchers who are really good at scuffing the ball.

Is it is skill...sure.

Should it be a skill that is rewarded...debatable.

This. Or spitting on it. Or guys who hit well with stolen signs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, weams said:

This. Or spitting on it. Or guys who hit well with stolen signs. 

I agree. My unease with the robo-Ump is the assumption that it will give us definitive truth. I suspect people will gripe about calls, promote conspiracies, and find something to question just as much in the robotic era as in the Joe West era. Plus, I would be happier if they published the error rate so that I could know when to say yeah that was an awesome strike 3 pitch!!!!!! (Within the 95% confidence interval!!!!!!!’ Heck yeah!!!!)

I like parts of my life to be fuzzy and human, like the games I watch.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • #50THANNIVERSARY On this day in 1970, the Orioles completed a three-game sweep of the Kansas City Royals.  The Orioles won by a score of 10-8. Mike Cuellar won his 15th game of the season with a 5.1 inning, 8 hit and 5 runs allowed effort.  He also walked 2 and struck out 5. Paul Blair and Curt Motton were the offensive catalysts for the Birds.  Blair went 4 for 5 with 2 doubles and 2 runs scored while Motton went 2 for 4 with a homerun, 2 runs scored and 5 RBI. BOX SCORE
    • No, Cashner’s value is based on what the market says it is.     No one was willing to give up any top prospect for him..or even organizational top 10-15 prospects. Some of the complaint about the deal revolved around the timing of the trade.  Elias traded him early, likely because he wanted to deal him before his value plummeted.  Had he waited and Cashner had done the same thing in Baltimore that he did in Boston, Elias would not have been able to trade him for anything more than some salary dump deal where they got nothing back but salary relief and even then, he may not have been able to do it.
    • Bleier was clearly dealing with injuries last season.  He appears healthy now.  When healthy he has pitched well since joining the O's.
    • Fact remains that we need quality pitching to raise to the top.   And especially in Camden Yards quality starting pitching is hard to find.   IMO its better to acquire a quality starter whenever you can.  Hitters are much easier to find with a home park like Camden.
    • It's 3 innings in 2 games. Last June he had a stretch where he allowed 1 run in 6.1 innings. One might have said that he certainly looked like he was back to his old form at that point. Then he had a 4.58 ERA the rest of the year.  Then in August he had a 2 game period with 2.2 innings, no runs, 1 hit, 4 Ks. Back to his old form right? But then he had a 4.60 ERA the rest of the way.
    • The crowd should give Bleier a standing ovation tonight.
    • #50THANNIVERSARY On this day in 1970, Jim Palmer pitched a complete game as the Baltimore Orioles beat the Kansas City Royals 9-1.  Palmer gave up 6 hits while walking 2 and striking out 5.  The Royals didn't touch Palmer for their lone run until the 8th inning when Amos Otis doubled with one out and Lou Piniella's two out single knocked him in; Palmer then surrendered a single to Bob Oliver before getting out of the inning. Merv Rettenmund led the way for Baltimore with a 4 for 5, 4 runs scored, 1 RBI game.  Elrod Hendricks went 3 for 4 with 1 run scored and 3 RBI and Davey Johnson went 3 for 5 with 1 run scored. BOX SCORE
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...