Jump to content
weams

For crying out loud, can MLB please implement an electronic strike zone already?

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Embarrasingly bad and then the quick toss after that major screw up? They need a system that allows a manager to challenge a terrible call through the electronic strikezone. These umpires just can't keep up anymore.

That call was all about the catcher's reaction instead of where the ball actually was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Embarrasingly bad and then the quick toss after that major screw up? They need a system that allows a manager to challenge a terrible call through the electronic strike zone. These umpires just can't keep up anymore.

IMO, I don't even think you need an appeal system.  An electronic pitch result system should be set up to relay each pitch to the ump in real time (earpiece) within a second or two of hitting the catcher's glove.  The only time the ump would have to overrule is if something happened that obviously impacted the result (like if a misthrown pitch bounced before coming across the plate).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, allquixotic said:

8SO8Q8I.png

I was going to post this! I haven't been able to watch live tonight but Gameday suggests a LOT of iffy calls tonight both ways.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the time I am against an electronic zone. I think a (SLIGHTLY) inconsistent ump adds to the charm of the game. Or if an ump calls a strange zone but calls it consistently that way. Or when (many) umps call the zone loose early on but it tightens up the later and closer the game gets. I like all that.

 

But a TERRIBLE ump like tonight makes me change my mind. That was ridiculous. I think a little more against us but was just terrible for both side's pitchers. I can't think of enough adjectives. Just embarrassing. :ohlord:

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

o

 

(ORIOLES vs. PHILLIES, 8/12)

 

Hey, if nothing else, the game that tonight's home-plate umpire called was a screaming endorsement for the need to institute an electronic strike-zone.

 

o

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

(ORIOLES vs. PHILLIES, 8/12)

 

Hey, if nothing else, the game that tonight's home-plate umpire called was a screaming advertisement for the need to have institute an electronic strike-zone.

 

o

BOTH benches and batters and pitchers were giving him hell. All night long. Not just us at home with a convenient box on the screen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, scOtt said:

BOTH benches and batters and pitchers were giving him hell. All night long. Not just us at home with a convenient box on the screen.

At least he was an equal opportunity incompetent umpire! :P It would be hilarious if he ended up tossing both teams' managers. I can think of at least a few former Orioles managers who would have gotten tossed tonight. Buck. Earl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, scOtt said:

Most of the time I am against an electronic zone. I think a (SLIGHTLY) inconsistent ump adds to the charm of the game. Or if an ump calls a strange zone but calls it consistently that way. Or when (many) umps call the zone loose early on but it tightens up the later and closer the game gets. I like all that.

 

But a TERRIBLE ump like tonight makes me change my mind. That was ridiculous. I think a little more against us but was just terrible for both side's pitchers. I can't think of enough adjectives. Just embarrassing. :ohlord:

I agree, although I am more forgiving. This was an egregious case. Presumably (knock on wood) something this bad wouldn’t happen in the playoffs.

Although, as was brought up in the game thread, it does kinda seem like the frequency of really atrocious umpiring has gone up. Not sure if that is true, or if it is true why that might be.

I am still in the human frailties camp. I don’t care that every ball/strike call is correct. I like ambiguity,  idiosyncrasies, having to adjust on the fly, and the occasional horrible injustice inflicted by an indifferent universe.  For me, an omnipresent robo ump would be less fun than having to discuss an occasionally atrocious human one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I stopped counting at 12 blown pitches. Ben could hardly contain himself. There were so many pitches on the line of the strike zone  he missed it's probably over 20 pitches he missed. Really bad !

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Absolutely atrocious. Never seen umpiring that bad. 
 
8th inning, tying run on second, Castro should have had Quinn struck out on #4. Phillies announcer said "3-1...I think? That looked right down the middle." Also given a free ball on#1. 
js13OXg.pngGame on the line, Sulser should have had Harper struck out on #4. Perfect pitch painting the corner. 
8Q4BvxI.png
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In some areas of private industry, there's a (fairly brutal, honestly) performance management process called "stack ranking." In stack ranking, everyone's performance is compared against each other, using a combination of objective and subjective metrics. The elite few at the top get raises and/or promotions; the solid contributors get to coast along undisturbed; the struggling end up getting "help" to try to improve their performance; and the worst of the worst get fired. This happens on a monthly, bi-annual or yearly cadence depending on the company.

Stack ranking of umpires would be based on their accuracy on calls compared to the "correct" call via video review / electronic strike zone. You could set up the strata exactly as you do for tech workers: give raises to the best, let the good ones keep going, pull the struggling ones from daily MLB games and have them work on their calls and improve in some kind of umpiring camp, and just fire the worst ~1% every year.

The other thing you could do is add more umpires to the umpiring pool. This would increase the "overhead" cost of umpiring, yes, but by adding more umpires without adding more teams or games, you could set up a situation where only the best X% of umpires get to call MLB games on the regular. The rest would either call simulated games, extended spring training games, or minor league games until they get better.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been in the robo ump camp for a while now, and these examples only strengthen my viewpoint.  The time has come to remove ball and strike calls from the umpire.  Make it happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem isn’t just missing pitches here and there, as frustrating as that can be for the players and managers. When an ump is having a bad game the batters, pitchers, and catchers have no idea what the strike zone is going to be from inning to inning or even from pitch to pitch. How was Realmuto to know that last pitch was going to be called strike three to end the game when a better pitch to Harper had been called a ball just seconds earlier? 
 

One of the main advantages of an electronic strike zone would be the consistency of that zone. What’s a strike now will be a strike next inning and next game and next year. I think that’s where the primary value will be found. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • While Lamar did play better than RG3, keep in mind the league context.  He had a 121 Rating+ (basically OPS+ for passer rating, adjusted for that season's averages. Over 100 is good, less is bad.)  Lamar's 2019 was 128.  So Lamar is still better, but that was RG3 as a rookie.  Who knows how he would have done if he didn't get hurt/if he was drafted by an org not owned by Dan Snyder.   That said, I don't think it's reasonable to use RG3's injury problems as a reason not to sign Lamar long term.  I think that they were specific to RG3 and the team he played for. (I think the Football Team horribly mismanaged him.)   In general running QBs havent had high injury risk, any more than regular QBs.  Look at Steve Young, Randall Cunningham, Russell Wilson, Newton, Culpeper, VIck.  All have been fairly durable, certainly no bigger an injury risk than any other QB.  There is some risk that some injuries are going to be more damaging to Lamar's career because of his reliance on his athleticism, but given that many running QBs have stayed productive into their 30s I think this risk is relatively low. I don't think Vick is a great comp because he didn't really figure out how to be a passer until after he came back from his jail sentence.  Vick's best Rating+ pre-jail/suspension is 104, which is worse than Lamar's 2020.  And that's taking 6 Vick seasons compared to 3 Lamar seasons. I think Deshaun Watson checks off more boxes as a good comp, because of the recency of his contract, his performance, his playoff (lack of) success, and his playing style. If we're being realistic, Lamar has no real comparables.  There isn't a QB in NFL history that generates as much true dual-threat value as Lamar.  I think this actually is a problem when trying to figure out how much to pay him.  He's got the intangibles, sure (at least when it comes to regular season play) but with no real comps, it's kind of impossible to project his development/future performance. We know that the Ravens don't really throw the ball much, but in 2019 they were pretty damn efficient at it, and in 2020 they were middle-of-the-pack.  But when you can run the ball for 6-10 yards a carry, it kind of eliminates the need to throw the ball.  Imagine how good you'd have to be throwing the ball to make it a better proposition than running in most game situations.  And we also don't know how much his running ability affects his passing game.  And there's no way to know that until he can't run anymore.  Which isn't happening for 4-5 years barring injury. Even if it's risky, I think you really have no choice but to pay him, especially if you can get a contract with an out after his age-28 or 29 season.  It's easy to point to our mistake with thinking Flacco was worth an extension, but that's no reason to deny Lamar his extension, especially given that he's already shown the ability to singlehandedly carry us into the playoffs, even if he has struggled once there.  Flacco never carried this team in the regular season the way Lamar does.  In fact it was our multiple HOFers on the other side of the ball that carried Flacco into the postseason so he could be the hero for a couple games.  Credit to him for stepping up in January, but someone has to get us there, and we don't have anyone else who can do that.  The chance that we find someone in the draft that can do that is not that great.  Certainly lower than the chance that Jackson is going to take us to the SB.  I guess we could talk swapping him for someone like Deshaun Watson, but I just don't know how plausible that really is.
    • Lol, you gotta wait until spring training for those gems.
    • Well, now we know why Jim Hunter became redundant.
    • Brob was one of those let go.  I will miss him!  But he  remains as an "ambassador" as does Demper.  
    • I must have missed it, but I haven't seen anyone mention B-rob. Is he gone? I thought I heard him on some broadcasts last summer.
    • Mike Vick, six years into his career (going into the dogfighting arrest) had a 71/52 TD/INT ratio, for a 75.7 QB rating. RG3, three years in, had a 40/23 TD/INT ratio, for a 90.6 QB rating. He then got hurt and was never the same again. Lamar, three years in, has a 68/18 TD/INT ratio, for a 102.6 QB rating. Lamar is head and shoulders above both of those players.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...