Jump to content
weams

For crying out loud, can MLB please implement an electronic strike zone already?

Recommended Posts

Long article in the Post today:

“This year there were 19,315 incorrect calls through Aug. 1, averaging out to 6.1 per game. While the rate of incorrect calls has remained steady in recent years, the impact of those calls is the highest it has ever been, largely because of umpires calling fewer strikes than expected since the data became available 13 years ago. Overall, 776 fewer strikes have been called than should have been based on location and who was at bat.

* * *

“No team has more of a gripe regarding missed calls on a season-long basis than the Baltimore Orioles. The O’s have seen 147 pitches called balls that should have been strikes, the biggest discrepancy of 2021. Data from TruMedia estimates these missed calls have led Baltimore to allow 21 more runs than expected in 2021. For comparison, the Kansas City Royals are next on the list with an estimated 11 more runs allowed because of missed strike calls this season. The Rangers have received the friendliest strike zone. Their pitchers have benefited from 130 more strike calls on pitches usually considered balls, saving them an estimated 18 runs allowed.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/08/16/worst-strike-zones-data/


 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Long article in the Post today:

“This year there were 19,315 incorrect calls through Aug. 1, averaging out to 6.1 per game. While the rate of incorrect calls has remained steady in recent years, the impact of those calls is the highest it has ever been, largely because of umpires calling fewer strikes than expected since the data became available 13 years ago. Overall, 776 fewer strikes have been called than should have been based on location and who was at bat.

* * *

“No team has more of a gripe regarding missed calls on a season-long basis than the Baltimore Orioles. The O’s have seen 147 pitches called balls that should have been strikes, the biggest discrepancy of 2021. Data from TruMedia estimates these missed calls have led Baltimore to allow 21 more runs than expected in 2021. For comparison, the Kansas City Royals are next on the list with an estimated 11 more runs allowed because of missed strike calls this season. The Rangers have received the friendliest strike zone. Their pitchers have benefited from 130 more strike calls on pitches usually considered balls, saving them an estimated 18 runs allowed.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/08/16/worst-strike-zones-data/


 

Interesting and I guess that it's mostly random but the Severino haters might have another opinion 😇.  We keep hearing JP say that if the target is on one side and the pitch is a strike where he is not set up, it is often not called.  Is it bad umpiring, the brutal heat of TX causing dizziness and rush to dinner or whatever?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yeah, he was terrible yesterday on pitches outside the zone.    Palmer remarked that he was amazed the teams had put up 14 runs, given the size of the strike zone.  

Eddings has always been a "pitcher's ump".   Back around the early to mid 2000s I was trying my hand at betting baseball, and I found that he and John Hirshbeck were the two  biggest pitcher's umps out there.   I'd look to bet the under when they were going to be behind home plate, or else if a good control pitcher was starting for one of the teams I would be more likely to bet on that team.   Anyone I felt would be able to take advantage of the big zone and paint the corners.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“No team has more of a gripe regarding missed calls on a season-long basis than the Baltimore Orioles. The O’s have seen 147 pitches called balls that should have been strikes, the biggest discrepancy of 2021. Data from TruMedia estimates these missed calls have led Baltimore to allow 21 more runs than expected in 2021."

No wonder we aren't making the playoffs.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

“No team has more of a gripe regarding missed calls on a season-long basis than the Baltimore Orioles. The O’s have seen 147 pitches called balls that should have been strikes, the biggest discrepancy of 2021. Data from TruMedia estimates these missed calls have led Baltimore to allow 21 more runs than expected in 2021."

No wonder we aren't making the playoffs.  

Because of Severino and his pathetic framing?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because of Severino and his pathetic framing?

Well, this is an interesting question.   The framing stats basically measure how many pitches were called incorrectly while a certain catcher was catching.   But I’d say that does not depend entirely on the skill of the catcher.   It may depend on whether the pitcher is hitting the catcher’s target vs. making him move his glove a long way to reach a pitch not in its intended spot.   And, to some extent, it may depend on the reputation of the batter or pitcher.    Maybe also on the stadium environment.  (I think it’s been shown that home teams get more calls, and that probably happens more often in a full stadium than an empty one.)   I believe all the O’s catchers have had bad framing stats the last couple of years, so there could be more afoot than purely catching skill.   Or not.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The above and built in bias against the really poor teams.  If they threw strikes they would have won more games????  Most questionable calls go against the really poor teams.  Electronic calling  of balls and strikes which I have wanted for years would help. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Tbh, that one didn't look egregious.  I've seen a lot worse this season.    

Fangraphs usually runs an article on the worst called balls and strikes of the season.   I agree I’ve seen worse that that one.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2021 Orioles Stats

2021 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I don't disagree...any return will be a lottery ticket. 
    • Very interesting idea.  I'm guessing you'd have to pair him with a top notch recruiter.
    • They are not going to get a meaningful return for Trey. If they trade him before the season starts, it will be mainly a salary dump. If he has a good first half and they trade him at the deadline, they won’t get much back for him because of his limitations, and because the receiving team only have him for a couple of months. It is possible that Elias may be able to do some Effective horse trading and get an unusual return for Trey, but it remains to be seen whether Mike can do that kind of trading.
    • I'm glad to see him go. Sure he had some good to really good recruiting classes but his offensive scheme was terrible. It seemed they constantly went on scoring droughts regardless of talent level on team. And they always played down to competition or came out looking horrible in the first half and that's on coaching.  Not to mention the way they play offense is just incredibly boring to watch.
    • If you get the right coach, you can win, whether or not you have a "top 25" job or not.  Look at what Nate Oats has done at Alabama, or what Mark Few has done at Gonzaga.   I wish Maryland had hired Porter Moser last spring, but that ship has sailed.  I would give Sarunas Jasikevicius serious consideration.  He's an alum from the Gary Williams days, he played in the NBA and became an international star, and he's currently the best coach in the European leagues.  
    • Then why are multiple basketball analysts calling this job a top-25 job and saying they think that Maryland has a legitimate chance to snag someone like Oats or Enfield or Musselman or Bruce Pearl?  This isn't my opinion - I actually don't think we can lure away Oats because we can't pay him what Alabama can.  But others think that this job is enticing enough that we could.   Edit to add: you haven't actually given me any reasons why Maryland is worse as a HC destinstion than the 5 schools I listed.  You literally just ad hominem in response.
    • Thanks for putting those together. I think not too bad is about right. Only a few below average but zero in the very good/elite range. Looks about average, maybe a little above if you squint.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...