Jump to content
Aglets

Should we be concerned with attendance numbers yet?

Recommended Posts

I know, I read it. :) Just an attempt at humor.

A flat one, apparently.

Seems like an assault charge was in order. The worst he ever did to me was tie my shoelaces to the railing when I was paying deep attention to the game.

Oh, that went right over my head. :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After 11 years of having season tickets I did not renew after they screwed Nick Markakis. Say what you want but I know several ppl who feel/felt the same way. Also I think the riots last year have not helped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
After 11 years of having season tickets I did not renew after they screwed Nick Markakis. Say what you want but I know several ppl who feel/felt the same way. Also I think the riots last year have not helped.

I understand the fan aspect of things, but they were willing to offer him a 3-year deal, which isn't really screwing the guy. If they wanted to screw him they would have slapped a Qualifying Offer on him, which they didn't.

Markakis is hitting .243 this year with an OPS of .663 and fWAR of 0.1. You know who else OPS'd about .663 last year? Travis Snider (.659), and we cut him, even though he was 80% cheaper than Markakis. And the Braves have 2 more years of this. I like Nick and miss seeing him in right, but they made the right call by letting him go.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sticking with the lack of promotions as compared to last year and that a lot of people had to purchase ticket plans for 2015 in order to get 2014 playoff tix. Also the terrible month long rain we had.

Personally I had a 29 game plan last year and have been to two walk up games this year. My ticket plan increased from $1,200 to like $1,700. The rain has hurt the spur of the moment walk up games for me. That and I vowed never to go to another game that Ubaldo starts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I live in Virginia and make it to typically 1-2 games a year only, but I have to wonder if the makeup of the starting rotation has anything to do with it. I know I always try to look at who the starters are when I go to a game, and I think Tilly and KG get people excited to go to games (even though KG has been rough lately, still has that potential), whereas the other 3 rotation spots are not good. Wilson has been decent at times, but just not somebody that puts butts in the seats. I look at last year and you had Chen who was solid, and Miggy, who even though was bad, was definitely a fan favorite after the work he'd put in the previous couple of years. So I think that the rotation definitely would play into it. Hard to shell out money when you've got pending explosions from Ubaldo and Wright lined up.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I live in Virginia and make it to typically 1-2 games a year only, but I have to wonder if the makeup of the starting rotation has anything to do with it. I know I always try to look at who the starters are when I go to a game, and I think Tilly and KG get people excited to go to games (even though KG has been rough lately, still has that potential), whereas the other 3 rotation spots are not good. Wilson has been decent at times, but just not somebody that puts butts in the seats. I look at last year and you had Chen who was solid, and Miggy, who even though was bad, was definitely a fan favorite after the work he'd put in the previous couple of years. So I think that the rotation definitely would play into it. Hard to shell out money when you've got pending explosions from Ubaldo and Wright lined up.

That's an interesting thought. I suppose it could be used in a round about way to support that old adage that you have to spend money to make money. In this case, it's starting pitching. Chicks can only dig the long ball for so long when the pitching gives back the runs. And there's also the rain as had been previously mentioned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think some people don't like the fact that you have to pay a surcharge when buying tickets online. My son and I went 6/17, wife purchased 2 tickets at $48.50 each, plus, $12.50 surcharge for each ticket, $25 extra dollars to allow me to print my own ticket is a tad ridiculous. I also think people don't realize that there is no surcharge on walk up tickets and also no tax.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1st NYY series was on a weekday and they averaged about 17,200 per game. 2nd series was on a weekend and they averaged about 29,000 per game. Plus Boston has only been in town 1 time and that was a weekday series too. Ist game of that series was Memorial day and attendance was 43900, but dropped to 17600 the next night, but averaged 21k the final 2 games of that series, so that might have something to do with it too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think some people don't like the fact that you have to pay a surcharge when buying tickets online. My son and I went 6/17, wife purchased 2 tickets at $48.50 each, plus, $12.50 surcharge for each ticket, $25 extra dollars to allow me to print my own ticket is a tad ridiculous. I also think people don't realize that there is no surcharge on walk up tickets and also no tax.

I get no surcharge part, but I dont get no tax part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
San Francisco.

Baltimore.

Both cities on a bay.

Oh I get it. You think because I said the Orioles should be more creative with their promotions and targeting of said promotions like the Giants do, that they should be exactly like what the Giants do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh I get it. You think because I said the Orioles should be more creative with their promotions and targeting of said promotions like the Giants do, that they should be exactly like what the Giants do.

I think that would help some.

But, the issue with attendance has been discussed in OH for years, and there is probably a variety of reasons.

I dont think, IMO, that there is a single issue that we can lay blame to the attendance numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I get no surcharge part, but I dont get no tax part.

I do not know why but last year, the last 2 games my son and I walked up and just paid face value for the tix, the was no tax on the receipt. Maybe its already figured in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is still a fee buying at the ticket window on game day...well at least there was last year. At the corner of the warehouse near were the Baltimore Sports Museum used to be there are ticket machines however. These were the only place to buy tickets without any fees last year.

This year....stubhub all the way. Tickets under face value are easy to find.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's an interesting thought. I suppose it could be used in a round about way to support that old adage that you have to spend money to make money. In this case, it's starting pitching. Chicks can only dig the long ball for so long when the pitching gives back the runs. And there's also the rain as had been previously mentioned.

Not sure I buy that. A high scoring first place team should be more alluring than a stingy pitching .500 team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • You are right..it’s not the answer I’m looking for because it’s not an answer to the question you were asked. If I ask you, what is your favorite color and you tell me a banana, that is an answer and it’s not one I’m looking for..that doesn’t mean in insulting you, it just means that trying to discuss this with you when you clearly don’t want to answer the questions and you want your agenda is a waste of time.  
    • Two milion?  You better check again.
    • I think people also have to remember where guys are in their careers. Diaz has almost 1500 MiL at bats.  He has over 700 at bats in AA alone and he has an OpS of 834 there.  Elias said that he would have been in AAA in 2019 had he not had injuries.  He doesn’t need to go to AA again.  He doesn’t have anything left there to prove.  He also just turned 24, so he is getting too old for the league anyway. Rutschman is an elite college bat.  He turns 23 in a few months.   By all accounts, he has looked great in the camps of 2020. You don’t just keep elite guys that are advanced in age and approach in the minors for that long.  It doesn’t happen and it shouldn’t happen.  If he was a 20 year old kid out of HS, it would be different.  But he’s not.  Now, he does have to perform a lot better than what we saw in 2019 but again, that goes without saying. Give him some time down there, make sure you gain the extra year this year and perhaps give him enough time to avoid Super 2 since he has so little pro experience but come early June or so, he should be ready to be here, if not sooner. The reality is, im fine with bringing him up as soon as they gain the extra year of service time in 2021.  I’m sure they will give him more time than just a few weeks though.
    • So I'm too stupid to "Comprehend" what you are asking.....But your not throwing insults! Same old Shtick!!!! I said that when Manicini was promoted it wasn't after a season where he didn't have a competitive AB. There is nothing wrong with that answer other than that is the answer you were looking for! I said Diaz season where he hit .262/807 was at AA and not AAA. So therefore the 2 circumstances are the same. Anyone with a little bit of intelligence can understand these differences (SEE I CAN DO IT ALSO!). Also ..... Diaz was a highly sought after IFA that got a 2 million dollar gift from the Dodgers that we received as a part of the Machado deal. I'd assume you'd agree that expectations should be higher for a high priced IFR or a #1 overall selection like Adley compared to your expectations for an 8th round pick that received a nominal bonus. People were "Meh" about getting Stallings (a 5th rounder) for Iglesias
    • https://www.houstonchronicle.com/texas-sports-nation/astros/article/Astros-trade-for-pitcher-Hector-Velazquez-Orioles-15442933.php You might be thinking this guy.  He was traded so fast he probably never hit the 60 man.
    • You don't think it would be shortsighted to rely on traditional counting stats to determine if a player is worthy of promotion? why even have an analytics department?
    • Zero teams ever have had a lineup composed entirely of “complete hitters”.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...