Jump to content
weams

2017 Orioles Draft Tracker

Recommended Posts

Just now, sportsfan8703 said:

I'm thinking DL hall slipped some but his asking price didn't.  $4 million (just a guess.)  That would explain our top 10.  

O's can't get to 4M without underslotting someone 2-5.

I don't think ownership has ever exceeded the slot cap, not even by the allowable <5%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Ok guys. It is complete. Let me know if you see any bad links or anything. We try to keep it clean.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, hoosiers said:

So, by my calculation, if the Os sign picks 6-10 for $10k each, that frees up near $800k for over slot signings within our bonus pool.  The Os can pay a tax and go 5% above their pool - which would allow for another $342k.  In total combining both assumptions, the Os could go approx. $1.137M above slot on their first six picks and their picks past round 10.  It should be noted that the Os have rarely, if ever, dipped into the extra 5% allocation though we may have had offers to prospects that were not accepted that did dip into these $.

The two main HS guys after round 10 who might entertain overslot $ are Logan Allen (consensus top 200 prospect) and Greg Jones (consensus top 100 draft prospect, who was tied to the Os in round 2 per some reports).

The main guys who may be due for over slot signings in our first 10 picks are IMO - the first rounder, Hall, who was rated around 12-14 entering the draft and who was draft 21st overall.  The difference in slot $ is about $1M.  If the Os offered $ associated with the 17th/18th overall picks, that would be about $3.25M or so, about $300k above slot.  Our scouting director was quoted as saying he did not expect our fourth rounder Conlon to be "there" - likely implying in that round - and he could require some over slot $.  Of course, there may be some other over slot guys after round 10 besides just Allen and Jones.

Obviously, it is very early in the signing process, and I have no idea of salary parameters already discussed - such as whether any other guys among out top six picks are overslot or underslot guys, but I will throw out a couple scenarios:

1) First rounder Hall gets $3.5M, Conlon goes over slot and the Os have little $ for guys outside the top 10 - maybe getting one guy who will sign for $250k or so..

2)  Hall gets closer to $3.2M, Conlon goes overslot by $100k-$200k, and the Os have $600k for Allen and maybe another guy outside the top 10 to get $250k OR Hall and Conlon go over slot and there is little $ for over slot signings after round 10 and the Os stick to their budget pool.

3)  Hall signs for about slot, Conlon about slot, and the Os max out their pool $ and have $800k-$1M for Greg Jones and pay the related tax $.  IMO, adding Jones would be a significant addition the likes of which we haven't seen in the draft since giving big $ to Ohlman and Coffey more than a couple years ago.  I guess, theoretically, in best case, with all top picks signing for slot, the Os could sign Jones for $800k and Allen for $500k.

Obviously, the $ for Hall is the big factor.  Maybe we knew his number and can meet that or tell him to take less or even slot.  How much farther in the draft could Hall have fallen if we didn't take him?  Because, then he is looking at slot $ closer to $2.4M-$2.6M or less - assuming he would sign.  We'll know more soon, but one has to like the possibilities created in the draft by our scouting director when he found Little and Conlon available when they were.

Great stuff! Thanks.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, hoosiers said:

So, by my calculation, if the Os sign picks 6-10 for $10k each, that frees up near $800k for over slot signings within our bonus pool.  The Os can pay a tax and go 5% above their pool - which would allow for another $342k.  In total combining both assumptions, the Os could go approx. $1.137M above slot on their first six picks and their picks past round 10.  It should be noted that the Os have rarely, if ever, dipped into the extra 5% allocation though we may have had offers to prospects that were not accepted that did dip into these $.

The two main HS guys after round 10 who might entertain overslot $ are Logan Allen (consensus top 200 prospect) and Greg Jones (consensus top 100 draft prospect, who was tied to the Os in round 2 per some reports).

The main guys who may be due for over slot signings in our first 10 picks are IMO - the first rounder, Hall, who was rated around 12-14 entering the draft and who was draft 21st overall.  The difference in slot $ is about $1M.  If the Os offered $ associated with the 17th/18th overall picks, that would be about $3.25M or so, about $300k above slot.  Our scouting director was quoted as saying he did not expect our fourth rounder Conlon to be "there" - likely implying in that round - and he could require some over slot $.  Of course, there may be some other over slot guys after round 10 besides just Allen and Jones.

Obviously, it is very early in the signing process, and I have no idea of salary parameters already discussed - such as whether any other guys among out top six picks are overslot or underslot guys, but I will throw out a couple scenarios:

1) First rounder Hall gets $3.5M, Conlon goes over slot and the Os have little $ for guys outside the top 10 - maybe getting one guy who will sign for $250k or so..

2)  Hall gets closer to $3.2M, Conlon goes overslot by $100k-$200k, and the Os have $600k for Allen and maybe another guy outside the top 10 to get $250k OR Hall and Conlon go over slot and there is little $ for over slot signings after round 10 and the Os stick to their budget pool.

3)  Hall signs for about slot, Conlon about slot, and the Os max out their pool $ and have $800k-$1M for Greg Jones and pay the related tax $.  IMO, adding Jones would be a significant addition the likes of which we haven't seen in the draft since giving big $ to Ohlman and Coffey more than a couple years ago.  I guess, theoretically, in best case, with all top picks signing for slot, the Os could sign Jones for $800k and Allen for $500k.

Obviously, the $ for Hall is the big factor.  Maybe we knew his number and can meet that or tell him to take less or even slot.  How much farther in the draft could Hall have fallen if we didn't take him?  Because, then he is looking at slot $ closer to $2.4M-$2.6M or less - assuming he would sign.  We'll know more soon, but one has to like the possibilities created in the draft by our scouting director when he found Little and Conlon available when they were.

HHP Top Story Front Page.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Give me some warning next time and I will do some editing. 

I did see an article where first round pick Hall discussed signing with Os versus college as two great options.  I have rarely seen a top prospect outside the consensus top 5 turn down $3M, but if Hall did, we would have that $ available from the 6-10 underslots to go after Jones and Allen.  One other thing with Hall that is a bit odd is that I have seen him listed at 6'2" on multiple sources and then 6 feet on others.  Hall has a big upside.

It would be nice to see the Os tell Hall to take slot $ or go to college.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope Hall is really good, because he affects the rest of our draft.  I don't see us going into the tax portion of the pool money but I do expect us to use the full pool.  This draft could be a huge success if we can get as many of the HS guys to sign as possible.  Just gives us more darts.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can confirm that 6th round pick, Mason McCoy, has signed.  We are a host family for the Ironbirds and we've just been informed he's staying with us.  He will arrive tomorrow.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • It's a little ironic that Joe Flacco and Lamar Jackson both have played for the Ravens because they are the polar opposite players. Joe was frustrating to watch during most of the regular season, but come playoff time became a HoF level QB who won many playoff games.  Jackson of course is a joy to watch for most of the regular season but is 1-3 come playoff time. I guess at the end of the day, what would you rather have? A guy who entertains you for 17 weeks of the year and then you take your chances come playoff time, or the guy who makes you wanna throw things at the TV for most of 17 weeks, then becomes another guy in the playoffs? For me, Jackson is a much more enjoyable QB to watch even though his playoff struggles are a concern at this point.
    • Its pretty telling that I am more upset about the Orioles and MASN getting rid of our favorite announcers than I am about the piss poor teams they have put together over the last 5 years, but alas, this is where we are. I would always have the pre-game show on while I was cleaning up dinner, so now I guess its just MLBN all the time except when our game is actually on. I've always liked Dempsey and Tom Davis and their over the top homerism.  I'm not sure why they get criticized, as I have no problems with local guys supporting the team that we all love. Gary Thorne is the biggest blow here.  Yes, he would make occasional mistakes with names or pitch locations, but unless you are visually impaired, I sure don't need a TV play by play guy to tell me what's happening on my screen.  Gary was an entertainer, pure and simple. He made even the worst Orioles blowouts entertaining to watch, his his stories, humor, and whiskey laugh.  I used to love the 7th inning Jack Daniels break, where he would proudly spout out..."Drink................................................five minutes later........responsibly!"  Made me laugh every time. On a personal note, 7 years ago when my wife and I went to our first (and thus far only) Spring Training trip, my wife ran into Gary at FanFest and was asking him for advice since he lives in the Sarasota area.  He took a good 10-15 minutes of his time to address her questions, make suggestions on where to stay, eat, what to do, etc.  He is a great guy, and I know he doesn't need this job, but I for one will sure miss him.   As for the Orioles.  Their on field product stinks.  They are cutting the shows on MASN.  They've been holding my season ticket money for 2 years without me having any positive to it.  I'd say this might just be the final straw to make me use my season ticket money after 2021 on more "entertaining" products.  
    • "He's got a modest two game hitting streak"
    • I know Tom Davis is a sort of Master at this.  He'll probably pop back up on MASN or WJZ.  He'll just buy his own time from them as he's done with football and baseball shows on WJZ before.  He'll get a sponsor to pay a certain amount for the desk to say "Weis" or "Eskay" or "Utz or all of them.  It'll be enough to pay the on-air fee, plus more to pay himself.  That's what those hilarious Mars fliers and picking your favorite snacks with Dave Johnson were all about that a poster above mentioned... sponsorships.  Programming thru sponsorship using time on the local stations that would otherwise be devoted to infomercials.
    • I love a good MASN pile on but outside of Gary Thorne I can't bring myself to get mad at any of the recent decisions. The streaming ordeal is not any different than the vast majority of other teams' options. Most of them require a cable subscription and aren't offered on Youtube TV, Hulu Tv and Sling. This also isn't really much different than Fox sports go, BTN, ESPN etc. where you still have to pay for a subscription package of some sort. As far as i know, none of these sports streaming services act as a Netflix/HBO model where you just pay a monthly fee for that content and that content alone. I pay for Hulu Tv to be able to watch live sports on all of those apps mentioned above. Even if you purchase ESPN + as a standalone service you don't get access to games not exclusively aired on ESPN+. Meaning you still require a subscription package to watch, say, the NCAA playoff games.  I do wonder if this is out of the Orioles hands in terms of what they are able to offer their fans regarding streaming. Doesn't change the fact that they were still late to offer mobile streaming at all and their programming was badly produced and very boring compared to other networks. Others may disagree, but i'd rather watch paint dry than watch Dave Johnson and Tom Davis on Wall to Wall Baseball. They have an opportunity with this app to have a more modern fan experience and it seems like they are sort of touting that. The devil is in the details though so we'll see.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...