Jump to content
pocketRIPKENS

MANCINI TRADE (Sideline Speculative Possibilities)

Recommended Posts

Make a case for trading Trey Mancini. What would he fetch? Is it completely moronic to trade him considering we have him locked up for 6 or so years? In my opinion, he isn't a perennial major league hitter, has very little versatility and is a defensive liability. His walk to K rate is bad and very feast or famine in my eyes. 

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, pocketRIPKENS said:

Make a case for trading Trey Mancini. What would he fetch? Is it completely moronic to trade him considering we have him locked up for 6 or so years? In my opinion, he isn't a perennial major league hitter, has very little versatility and is a defensive liability. His walk to K rate is bad and very feast or famine in my eyes. 

Probably the best case for trading Mancini is if you want to alienate your fans, and overspend on more expensive talent for no reason when you have a near .900 OPS rookie on your roster making peanuts for salary.

It's not a particularly strong case imo.   Obviously if you can get someone else who's cheap and amazing..........but good luck with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, pocketRIPKENS said:

Make a case for trading Trey Mancini. What would he fetch? Is it completely moronic to trade him considering we have him locked up for 6 or so years? In my opinion, he isn't a perennial major league hitter, has very little versatility and is a defensive liability. His walk to K rate is bad and very feast or famine in my eyes. 

On what do you base this opinion?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who choked on his coffee reading this thread title?

Given the Orioles desperate need for starting pitching along with not one but two overpriced 1B, I can see Mancini being traded.  I certainly hope the Orioles don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It makes a lot more sense to trade Britton for a starter than to trade Mancini.   Boras probably takes Britton to free agency after the 2018 season.   Between July 5th and July 31st he can show he is healthy.  His value in two pennant races would be high.

The O's have Mancini for 5 more year and he will be cheap for the next several years.   I can't see the O's trading Mancini.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

How do you know?

I would trade him for a quality young pitcher, but there really isn't a need to force anything. 

 

Doing nothing could quickly become a regret if he becomes a mediocre player, which given his minor league track record and walk to k rate is a possibility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

It makes a lot more sense to trade Britton for a starter than to trade Mancini.   Boras probably takes Britton to free agency after the 2018 season.   Between July 5th and July 31st he can show he is healthy.  His value in two pennant races would be high.

The O's have Mancini for 5 more year and he will be cheap for the next several years.   I can't see the O's trading Mancini.

You trade Britton because it makes sense if he is healthy. That's the end of that story. One player has nothing to do with the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OF is our only position of prospect depth in the minors right now, so with 1B blocked for a while, I'd be willing to reluctantly consider a Mancini trade for a quality young SP or SS.  But, you better make sure you get the evaluation right, because if Mancini goes elsewhere and flourishes and whoever you get back doesn't, that's a trade that can get you fired.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

You trade Britton because it makes sense if he is healthy. That's the end of that story. One player has nothing to do with the other.

  They have a lot to do with each other.  If the O's trade Britton they probably don't need to trade Mancini.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

OF is our only position of prospect depth in the minors right now, so with 1B blocked for a while, I'd be willing to reluctantly consider a Mancini trade for a quality young SP or SS.  But, you better make sure you get the evaluation right, because if Mancini goes elsewhere and flourishes and whoever you get back doesn't, that's a trade that can get you fired.

Who gives up a quality young SP for Mancini?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Minor League Depth Chart

2021 Prospect Power Rankings

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2948617-fresh-predictions-for-top-2021-22-mlb-free-agents-with-offseason-approaching.amp.html   Btw, if this article is right, GTFO all of these guys except Stroman..I would beat that offer and not think twice about it.
    • From 2017-2019, he didn’t appear in more than 110 games. Bryant and Correa debuted in MLB the same year and Bryant is worth 7 more WAR. Bryant isnt some butcher at third.  You are greatly overreacting to his defense as of right now.  We agree that it will be an issue in a few years and he likely won’t stay at third long term but he can still play there now. Baez is about to turn 29.  He’s an intriguing option but I think he’s wAnts glitz and glamour.  He seems to be a guy like that, so I dont think he’s a likely signing for us.     To be honest with you, I think all of these guys are extremely risky.  If we are talking the FA route, I like Bryant aging well and keeping up his value whether it’s in the OF or first.  I think his bat will stay strong, especially in our park, that he will have value anywhere he plays.     But look at the SS..Correa and Seager have health issues.  Story’s having an off year, he’s about to turn 29 and his career OPs on the road is almost 250 points less than at home in Coors.  Simien has had his recent issues. The stat you brought up is great but the bottom line is that our current OF is completely unreliable.     We will wait and see on Mullins but no one should be going into the offseason feeling great about Santander and Hays.  On top of that, we don’t know how long Mancini will be here, who has helped with that stat.     Beyond that, we agree about the long term viability of the OF but it wasn’t long ago where we thought Diaz was a long term guy and Mullins was garbage…things change fast.  Personally, I don’t feel Stowers or Neustrom will be everyday guys but I do want to see them get a chance.  And of course we still know nothing about Kjerstad. One thing I will say is that the best case scenario would be to get a Nolan Jones or someone like that, for third or SS (ie, an up and coming young player with high upside who is attainable) and spend the money elsewhere.
    • I wouldn't "hand" anyone a job.  But, I would like to see Mateo given an extended look in 2022 to see what we have there.  I liked what I saw in a limited look.  We need to see if he is more than a utility or AAAA player.
    • Right, but you can't tell who can do that based off the number of runs they've scored.  
    • That will never get old. It certainly does get oldER, though, has it been long enough that we can remark on how young those guys look?
    • It doesn’t look dirty to me. The camera angle might be a little deceiving, but it appears he may have made some kind of move toward 2B after running through 1B and needed to get back on 1B. The runner has every right to be on base. The fielder/pitcher does not get to dominate the base like that. You could make a case that he pushed him for both to avoid a collision with knees or getting spiked. Those things cause legitimate injury.  He has never been considered a dirty player that I have ever heard. To me, it’s a good kind of competitive toughness that is taught from 9 years old. If a player stands in the middle of first base without providing a path for the runner, the runner can run through them. It is what it is. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...