Jump to content
Frobby

Should JJ Hardy get his starting job back once he's healthy?

Recommended Posts

A while ago I was really down on Ruben Tejada based on a few boneheaded fielding plays he made, but he has played reasonably well for the last couple of weeks.    Overall, he's hitting .250/.306/.310, and has been worth 0.0 rWAR.     JJ Hardy, by comparison, is hitting .211/.248/.308 and has been worth -0.6 rWAR.

I think we all know what Buck will do, but aside from that, would you put Hardy back in the starting lineup when he's healthy?

As an aside, assuming he stays on our roster the rest of the year, Tejada will be a free agent at the end of the season.   He only needs another 32 days of service time to reach free agency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

A while ago I was really down on Ruben Tejada based on a few boneheaded fielding plays he made, but he has played reasonably well for the last couple of weeks.    Overall, he's hitting .250/.306/.310, and has been worth 0.0 rWAR.     JJ Hardy, by comparison, is hitting .211/.248/.308 and has been worth -0.6 rWAR.

I think we all know what Buck will do, but aside from that, would you put Hardy back in the starting lineup when he's healthy?

As an aside, assuming he stays on our roster the rest of the year, Tejada will be a free agent at the end of the season.   He only needs another 32 days of service time to reach free agency.

That's a hard question but I lean toward Hardy. The season is basically over. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Hardy gets the job back when he returns. Should he, probably not, but it's not like there is anyone that's a major upgrade over him on the roster. Hopefully the position can be upgraded in the off season, and not Hardy returning on a cheap deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tejada had a bad June and a good July.  Who knows what August holds?    Hardy is not projected to be until the third or fourth week of August.  Its too early to say what will happen.  We need to see more of Tejada.

Both Tejada and Hardy will be FA,  I would not be surprised to see both of them back with the O's next year.   Hardy is more likely to make 3m than 14m.   Tejada may not have anyone that likes him was much as Buck if he plays well for the rest of the season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, MDtransplant757 said:

I wonder about Zack Cozart if he doesn't stay in Cincy. Would love to have him here. 

Because signing 32 year old middle infielders is such a great idea?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, mdbdotcom said:

Because signing 32 year old middle infielders is such a great idea?

OPS .971 and he's great a defense. I'd take him. Better hitter than Hardy ever was, and he's a lefty OBP bat. Imagine him and sisco at the 1 and 2 spots. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MDtransplant757 said:

OPS .971 and he's great a defense. I'd take him. Better hitter than Hardy ever was, and he's a lefty OBP bat. Imagine him and sisco at the 1 and 2 spots. 

I think we're getting off track. The question is whether you would give Hardy back his starting job this season. Next season is a different story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, PaulFolk said:

I think we're getting off track. The question is whether you would give Hardy back his starting job this season. Next season is a different story.

This season? Sure, because they practically are the same player. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd play Hardy. He's at least as good as Tejada probably a better glove, and he's a team leader. And it does't matter anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • To be fair, they are artificially the worst team.  If they let the best 26 play, they would win more games.
    • And you and yours as well!
    • I would prefer they play a normal 10th  or 11th. Then go to the new rule. For those of you who are diehard fans, I suppose this change is blasphemy, but other sports have changed their rules and it makes it more exciting. 4 on 4 hockey is more exciting than 5 on 5. Shoot outs are exciting. I don't like 4 hour games. I imagine players and managers hate long games. Your observation is like a kid seeing a food and says he doesn't like it before he tastes it. This is the non-season to try it, basically a 60 game exhibition schedule, where all stats are basically meaningless. Even the eventual WS winner have an asterisk. It will nice to see them play. In fact the O's may benefit more than normal...give the kids a chance and long look.
    • The 30 year treasury was around 6% in Feb. 2000, so we can consider that the risk free rate. It looks like high quality long term corporate bonds were around 8%, that’s probably more comparable. So this was probably pretty close to a fair deal. 
    • Is it wrong to make a choice that will work out in your favor 99% of the time, and there's no way to tell if this particular choice is the 1%? At 33: Carlos Delgado had a 161 OPS+.  Over his last four years of his career he was worth 4.8 wins. Jack Clark had a 148 OPS+.  Three years later he was done. Derrek Lee had a 146 OPS+.  Two years later he was an Oriole... and done. Pedro Guerrero had a 145 OPS+.  The next season would be his last with average batting numbers. Aubrey Huff had a 142 OPS+.  He never had a 100 again. Lance Berkman had a 140 OPS+. He'd have two more pretty good seasons. John Olerud had a 140 OPS+.  After that he played 214 games with a 98 OPS+. Jeff Bagwell had a 140 OPS+.  He actually had three more good years before falling off and retiring. Mike Easler had a 140 OPS+.  He had one more .800 OPS season. Cecil Cooper had a 138 OPS+.  He had one more season where he was an average or better hitter. Don Baylor had a 138 OPS+ (actually at 34).  He had one more season with an .800 OPS. George Hendrick had a 138 OPS+.  He had one more part-time season with an .800 OPS. Andre Thornton had a 123.  He's have one more good year. Adrian Gonzalez had a 130 OPS+.  Since then he's gone .784, .642, .672. Dmitri Young had a 129 OPS+.  The next year would be his last. Then you have Nelson Cruz and David Ortiz at 137.  Cruz has a .928 OPS and been worth 21 wins since leaving Baltimore.  And Ortiz had perhaps the best late career hitting and phone smashing record of all time. Also, remember Cruz was born July 1st, on the cutoff date, so if he'd been born 12 hours later his walk year with the O's would have been his age 34 season, so we'd be comparing him to these guys a year later and a year worse.
    • Happy 4th to all here at the Hangout!   May you have a safe and restful day with your family!   Best, Johnny    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...