Jump to content
Frobby

Should JJ Hardy get his starting job back once he's healthy?

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, MDtransplant757 said:

OPS .971 and he's great a defense. I'd take him. Better hitter than Hardy ever was, and he's a lefty OBP bat. Imagine him and sisco at the 1 and 2 spots. 

Career OPS .706, never OPSed more than .732 before this year.   We'd be buying him at a premium hoping that he manages to reproduce a total fluke year that he had at age 32.

Absoutely not.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One guy is batting .250 and the other .211.   

One guy is 34 and the other is 27.   Most SS are past their peak before 34 years old. http://www.fangraphs.com/community/peak-age-range-for-the-shortstop-position/

Both are fairly sure handed, but the older one has less range then he used to.  He doesn't make errors on balls he doesn't reach, but ALL of them go into the outfield as singles.

One earns $13 million dollars this year and the other earns $1.3 million.  There could be a savings of more than $10 million, which could be added to the offer for a free agent pitcher.

The Orioles #3 prospect (Monutcastle) is due in in '19 and the #10 prospect (Hall) is due in in '21.  There is something in the pipeline.  Many prospective trade partners have highly rated SS available and have the SS position blocked by very good major leaguers, so something good might happen cheap there.

 

I think it is time to save money and start the future.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/28/2017 at 9:30 PM, eddie83 said:

Hardy is a class act and if he is healthy deserves to be the starting SS. 

Maybe he'll help us win a class act award?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DirtyBird said:

Maybe he'll help us win a class act award?

You think how teams treat someone like a JJ Hardy, who is a respected player has no value in the clubhouse? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

You think how teams treat someone like a JJ Hardy, who is a respected player has no value in the clubhouse? 

 

I was just being a smartass.

But really, I think you need to take a couple things into consideration before you just insert him back into that spot. But yeah, this is the right thing for Buck to say at this moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hardy is a + 7 Rtot at SS so far this year. Beckham is -7 . IMO the glove is the most important aspect of SS. I don't think the difference in Beckham's bat is worth 14 R.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Hardy is a + 7 Rtot at SS so far this year. Beckham is -7 . IMO the glove is the most important aspect of SS. I don't think the difference in Beckham's bat is worth 14 R.

This.....

Beckham is not good with the glove which is why I hated the move to get him. JJ may not hit a lick but at least he is reliable defensively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

You think how teams treat someone like a JJ Hardy, who is a respected player has no value in the clubhouse? 

 

Unfortunately likely not enough value to overcome a .556 OPS.   But it is classic Buck favoritism of his "nuggets" rather than the sometime cutthroat decisions needed to win a World Series. 

It will be particularly interesting if Beckham goes on an absolute tear offensively and defensively for the next three weeks as to whether Buck just sits him for a rusty, aging Hardy. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Unfortunately likely not enough value to overcome a .556 OPS.   But it is classic Buck favoritism of his "nuggets" rather than the sometime cutthroat decisions needed to win a World Series. 

It will be particularly interesting if Beckham goes on an absolute tear offensively and defensively for the next three weeks as to whether Buck just sits him for a rusty, aging Hardy. 

And you are certain he would have a .556 OPS when he comes back?   He hit .716 last year.   Maybe rest and getting healthy will do him some good.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Hardy is a + 7 Rtot at SS so far this year. Beckham is -7 . IMO the glove is the most important aspect of SS. I don't think the difference in Beckham's bat is worth 14 R.

You labeled your quoted stats as "Rtot", but the stats that you quoted appear to be Rtot/yr

Rtot/yr represents fielding runs above average over 1200 innings (per BB-Ref)

Beckham has played 600 innings this year at shortstop with a Rtot/yr of -7

Hardy has played 546 innings at shortstop with a Rtot/yr of 8

The earliest that Hardy can return is August 18th; if JJ were to play shortstop for 9 innings for all of the remaining regular season games at this year's fielding effectiveness to date, he would contribute 2.4 Rtot.  Again, at this year's rate of production, he would contribute an overall WAR of -0.6

The expected numbers for Beckham over those last 60 games are -2.1 Rtot and a WAR of .5

So, over the last 60 games, the differential is +4.5 fielding runs for Hardy and +1.1 WAR for Beckham

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Unfortunately likely not enough value to overcome a .556 OPS.   But it is classic Buck favoritism of his "nuggets" rather than the sometime cutthroat decisions needed to win a World Series. 

It will be particularly interesting if Beckham goes on an absolute tear offensively and defensively for the next three weeks as to whether Buck just sits him for a rusty, aging Hardy. 

I doubt either way Buck is going to let Beckham rot on the bench.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • o   Zack Greinke will try for a reversal of fortune from Game One ........ Masahiro Tanaka will hope for more of the same.     (ALCS, Game Four) *****************     NEW YORK YANKEES Pending 田中 将大 - RHP )) (11-9, 4.45 ERA)   HOUSTON ASTROS Pending Donald Zachary Greinke - RHP )) (18-5, 2.93 ERA) ) *   * )) (10-4, 2.90 ERA) OOO [ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS] OOOOO (8-1, 3.02 ERA) OOO [HOUTON ASTROS]   https://www.baseballpress.com/lineups   o
    • Heard this little ditty tonight out of work.   Brand new.  
    • And tanking/not being good got them Harper, Strasburg, Rendon and a host of other talents.  Even if they win, it's a legit possibility that Rendon and Strasburg both depart via free agency, and without them, they've got a team that will hang a few games around .500, if they get the bullpen right. 
    • Yep, it's pretty clear what they are doing now. They're all in for this year which is a little weird, because I honestly don't think they are that great, but I guess this is the end of their run so might as well go for it!
    • That is where the accounting chicanery comes into play.  They still paying debt service on the money Angelos loaned the team?
    • I think this misrepresents the non-payroll expenses of the team.    Per Forbes, in 2018 the O’s had revenues of $251 mm, of which $42 mm were gate receipts.    The team reportedly had operating losses of $6.5 mm, and player expenses (salaries + benefits) of $161 mm.   So, that implies that other costs were $251 mm - $161 mm + $6.5 mm = $96.5 mm.    That’s more than paying trivial rent and a few coaches.      Extrapolating those numbers to this year, let’s assume non-gate revenue was flat, gate revenue was down proportionately to attendance (but it may have been worse), and player expenses were proportionate to payroll per BB-ref.   That leads to the following estimate:      Gate receipts $33.5 mm Other revenue: $209 mm Total revenue $242.5 mm Less: non-player expenses $96.5 mm Less: player expenses $94 mm  Net income:   $52.5 mm That’s probably too high, given that Elias has been investing in technology, infrastructure etc.   We’ll see what Forbes estimates next spring.     But certainly Elias had savings available to invest in other areas.
    • I am glad this OP was not around in the 1960s...1969-1971...average attendance was never even at 14,000 with the greatest teams of all time.  Guess what...still here.  I will love to look back on  this thread and some of these posts in three or four years when we are back in it.   And when we get back in it AND the Nats are a power team...maybe a true rivalry will exist and maybe even a Beltway Series.  A true rivalry will fire up new fans in both areas.  Either way, the Orioles are going nowhere. Not in 10 years, not in 15 years, not in 100 years.   No other location has Camden Yards, Babe Ruth’s birthplace, Cal, Frank, Brooks, Eddie, Earl and MLB is not going to leave this iconic ballpark and its tradition empty and abandoned to move to ummm Nashville...lol. My niece also is the agent now for Harbor East and other new downtown condos...they are as hot as anything in DC or anyplace else. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...