Jump to content
Frobby

Should JJ Hardy get his starting job back once he's healthy?

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, MDtransplant757 said:

OPS .971 and he's great a defense. I'd take him. Better hitter than Hardy ever was, and he's a lefty OBP bat. Imagine him and sisco at the 1 and 2 spots. 

Career OPS .706, never OPSed more than .732 before this year.   We'd be buying him at a premium hoping that he manages to reproduce a total fluke year that he had at age 32.

Absoutely not.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One guy is batting .250 and the other .211.   

One guy is 34 and the other is 27.   Most SS are past their peak before 34 years old. http://www.fangraphs.com/community/peak-age-range-for-the-shortstop-position/

Both are fairly sure handed, but the older one has less range then he used to.  He doesn't make errors on balls he doesn't reach, but ALL of them go into the outfield as singles.

One earns $13 million dollars this year and the other earns $1.3 million.  There could be a savings of more than $10 million, which could be added to the offer for a free agent pitcher.

The Orioles #3 prospect (Monutcastle) is due in in '19 and the #10 prospect (Hall) is due in in '21.  There is something in the pipeline.  Many prospective trade partners have highly rated SS available and have the SS position blocked by very good major leaguers, so something good might happen cheap there.

 

I think it is time to save money and start the future.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/28/2017 at 9:30 PM, eddie83 said:

Hardy is a class act and if he is healthy deserves to be the starting SS. 

Maybe he'll help us win a class act award?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DirtyBird said:

Maybe he'll help us win a class act award?

You think how teams treat someone like a JJ Hardy, who is a respected player has no value in the clubhouse? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

You think how teams treat someone like a JJ Hardy, who is a respected player has no value in the clubhouse? 

 

I was just being a smartass.

But really, I think you need to take a couple things into consideration before you just insert him back into that spot. But yeah, this is the right thing for Buck to say at this moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hardy is a + 7 Rtot at SS so far this year. Beckham is -7 . IMO the glove is the most important aspect of SS. I don't think the difference in Beckham's bat is worth 14 R.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Hardy is a + 7 Rtot at SS so far this year. Beckham is -7 . IMO the glove is the most important aspect of SS. I don't think the difference in Beckham's bat is worth 14 R.

This.....

Beckham is not good with the glove which is why I hated the move to get him. JJ may not hit a lick but at least he is reliable defensively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

You think how teams treat someone like a JJ Hardy, who is a respected player has no value in the clubhouse? 

 

Unfortunately likely not enough value to overcome a .556 OPS.   But it is classic Buck favoritism of his "nuggets" rather than the sometime cutthroat decisions needed to win a World Series. 

It will be particularly interesting if Beckham goes on an absolute tear offensively and defensively for the next three weeks as to whether Buck just sits him for a rusty, aging Hardy. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Unfortunately likely not enough value to overcome a .556 OPS.   But it is classic Buck favoritism of his "nuggets" rather than the sometime cutthroat decisions needed to win a World Series. 

It will be particularly interesting if Beckham goes on an absolute tear offensively and defensively for the next three weeks as to whether Buck just sits him for a rusty, aging Hardy. 

And you are certain he would have a .556 OPS when he comes back?   He hit .716 last year.   Maybe rest and getting healthy will do him some good.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Hardy is a + 7 Rtot at SS so far this year. Beckham is -7 . IMO the glove is the most important aspect of SS. I don't think the difference in Beckham's bat is worth 14 R.

You labeled your quoted stats as "Rtot", but the stats that you quoted appear to be Rtot/yr

Rtot/yr represents fielding runs above average over 1200 innings (per BB-Ref)

Beckham has played 600 innings this year at shortstop with a Rtot/yr of -7

Hardy has played 546 innings at shortstop with a Rtot/yr of 8

The earliest that Hardy can return is August 18th; if JJ were to play shortstop for 9 innings for all of the remaining regular season games at this year's fielding effectiveness to date, he would contribute 2.4 Rtot.  Again, at this year's rate of production, he would contribute an overall WAR of -0.6

The expected numbers for Beckham over those last 60 games are -2.1 Rtot and a WAR of .5

So, over the last 60 games, the differential is +4.5 fielding runs for Hardy and +1.1 WAR for Beckham

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Unfortunately likely not enough value to overcome a .556 OPS.   But it is classic Buck favoritism of his "nuggets" rather than the sometime cutthroat decisions needed to win a World Series. 

It will be particularly interesting if Beckham goes on an absolute tear offensively and defensively for the next three weeks as to whether Buck just sits him for a rusty, aging Hardy. 

I doubt either way Buck is going to let Beckham rot on the bench.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • Not trying to be smart, but I thought Cal had sold off his share of the Aberbeen, along with another of his minor league holders. Nobody said why, but, shortly later, his divorce became public, and people assume he was putting together her part of the holdings.
    • I'm don't think I'm making any large leaps assuming that Aberdeen is hands-off because of Cal Ripken.
    • Why should Delmarva get sacrificed?  After all, they were the Minor League Team of the Year and has a modern stadium in Salisbury.  Screw convenience... it's nice to have professional baseball come through the Eastern Shore since 1996 and I don't see why that should be tampered with.  An increase in affiliation could lead to the team putting more seats down the left and right side of the diamond to encourage more revenue to accommodate their increased affiliation.
    • At this point, this is throwing good money after bad.  Any appeal is almost certain to be doomed.  What error has the court committed to warrant review?  Angelos just lived through one of his biggest fears.  The Nats winning a World Series.
    • On the heels of a game where Sam Koch didn't punt once. Hoping this formats correctly:   Tm Year G Pnt Pnt/G   Rk Tm Year G Pnt Pnt/G 1 HOU 1990 16 34 2.13   1 BAL 2019 10 21 2.10 2 SDG 1982 9 23 2.56               3 SFO 1993 16 42 2.63               4 NOR 2018 16 43 2.69               5 STL 2001 16 43 2.69               6 LAR 2018 16 43 2.69               7 STL 2000 16 44 2.75               8 KAN 2018 16 45 2.81               9 NWE 2007 16 45 2.81               10 DEN 2008 16 46 2.88               11 NOR 2011 16 47 2.94   2 DAL 2019 10 29 2.90 12 SDG 2011 16 47 2.94   3 LAC 2019 10 29 2.90 13 DET 1971 14 42 3.00   4 ATL 2019 10 30 3.00 14 ATL 2016 16 48 3.00               15 IND 2006 16 48 3.00               16 SFO 1992 16 49 3.06               17 WAS 2016 16 49 3.06               18 DET 1972 14 43 3.07               19 NWE 2008 16 50 3.13   5 KAN 2019 10 31 3.10 20 MIA 1972 14 44 3.14              
    • If anyone predicted this is how Lamar would be at this point, I have my doubts about their veracity.  That being said, I remember the player RG3 was before he broke his knee, and he has never been the player since.  IF Lamar can stay healthy, his future looks very bright. Right before the season started, a caller into 105.7 asked about McSorely and his words were "IF God forbid something happened to Lamar. Rob Long got all indignant and unnecessarily confrontational. "Lemme ask you something why are you asking that question?  Why are YOU askin' that question?"
    • I don't think the premise is very different. JJ was traded for whatever we could get  because we didn't want to pay him his arb number, which would be the same thing happening to Villar. You can make a very reasonable case that Villar is a regression candidate for 2020. Like @weams mentioned.. nobody bit at the trade deadline last year when he was cheaper and having a career year, which I think is telling. Milwaukee practically handed him to us. It seems that we value him on this board much more than other league execs do. But like I've said three times now, I'm not trying to bash Villar or shoo him out of town. I'd be just fine if they decided to keep him and pay his arb salary. I'm just pointing out that it's not some egregious baseball sin to non-tender him. It's a reasonable alternative.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...