Jump to content
Frobby

Should JJ Hardy get his starting job back once he's healthy?

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, backwardsk said:

Exactly, assuming Trumbo's back is not worse than first thought.

Hardy and Santander are expected back on the 18th.  Does Flaherty need to come back?  Can he be sent down?

As a five-year veteran, I do not believe Flaherty can be sent down without his consent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

I hope not... Beckham has proven he is not a ML starter. I have no idea why DD traded for him except he seems to be drawn to washed out former first round picks like a moth to a candle.

Please. He's hitting 260 with 12 HR's. You can do a whole lot worse.

I'd start the young guy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

As a five-year veteran, I do not believe Flaherty can be sent down without his consent.

It's going to be difficult for those two weeks because that's 14 position players and six SPs.  Maybe they send Rickard down?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

I hope not... Beckham has proven he is not a ML starter. I have no idea why DD traded for him except he seems to be drawn to washed out former first round picks like a moth to a candle.

How has he proven he's not a ML starter? His first full year starting he was on pace for 2 WAR, the average for a ML starter. Not great, but not saying anything about his inability to be a starter either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, backwardsk said:

It's going to be difficult for those two weeks because that's 14 position players and six SPs.  Maybe they send Rickard down?

That's probably what I'd do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It depends how much better his glove is, and how much better Beckham's bat is.    It's not as simple as glove > bat just because they're shortstops.    

I'm sure Hardy will get his job back, and I hope he hits much better than .556 OPS when he returns.   His bat was showing minor signs of life (.838 OPS over 7 games) immediately before he got hurt.   For the record, if Hardy continues at a .556 pace, I do not think his glove justifies being played over Beckham.   

Agreed. I think Buck likes his guys too much not to give Hardy at least 50% of the starts upon his return... unless he comes back and is as bad or worse than he's been so far this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, ORIOLE33 said:

Please. He's hitting 260 with 12 HR's. You can do a whole lot worse.

I'd start the young guy. 

It's his defense and his low OBP that will keep him from being a ML starter. He just got dumped from a team in a pennant race, and now he is our SS of the future. PLEAAAAAASE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

Agreed. I think Buck likes his guys too much not to give Hardy at least 50% of the starts upon his return... unless he comes back and is as bad or worse than he's been so far this year.

The majority of teams in the league would have DFA'd a guy like Hardy in the final year of his contract playing like a struggling AAA player. Buck is a great manager but his one big fault is he is way too loyal to players. If veterans never have to worry about job security that makes them lax and at the same time it hurts the motivation of young players knowing that no matter how good they play, they won't start unless a guy gets injured or leaves.

A team should start the best 9 players, not the 9 players the manager has the best memories with.

 

11 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

It's his defense and his low OBP that will keep him from being a ML starter. He just got dumped from a team in a pennant race, and now he is our SS of the future. PLEAAAAAASE

Oh please, his OBP is higher then Hardys last few years and his defense rates as average at worst. He's an upgrade from Hardy and pretty much any other SS we could get without breaking the bank in free agency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, AlbionHero said:

The majority of teams in the league would have DFA'd a guy like Hardy in the final year of his contract playing like a struggling AAA player. Buck is a great manager but his one big fault is he is way too loyal to players. If veterans never have to worry about job security that makes them lax and at the same time it hurts the motivation of young players knowing that no matter how good they play, they won't start unless a guy gets injured or leaves.

A team should start the best 9 players, not the 9 players the manager has the best memories with.

 

Oh please, his OBP is higher then Hardys last few years and his defense rates as average at worst. He's an upgrade from Hardy and pretty much any other SS we could get without breaking the bank in free agency.

Thats what Ive been saying and a lot of people on this board think Im nuts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, AlbionHero said:

The majority of teams in the league would have DFA'd a guy like Hardy in the final year of his contract playing like a struggling AAA player. Buck is a great manager but his one big fault is he is way too loyal to players. If veterans never have to worry about job security that makes them lax and at the same time it hurts the motivation of young players knowing that no matter how good they play, they won't start unless a guy gets injured or leaves.

A team should start the best 9 players, not the 9 players the manager has the best memories with.

 

Oh please, his OBP is higher then Hardys last few years and his defense rates as average at worst. He's an upgrade from Hardy and pretty much any other SS we could get without breaking the bank in free agency.

Fine we'll start Beckham at SS, Davis at 1B, Trumbo at DH, and bring in O'day to mop up

That's four guys on next years 25 man roster that aren't starters on a championship team, but I'm sorry the O's goal is second wild card or perhaps a non-losing season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, webbrick2010 said:

It's his defense and his low OBP that will keep him from being a ML starter. He just got dumped from a team in a pennant race, and now he is our SS of the future. PLEAAAAAASE

The league OBP at SS is .315.   Beckham is at .316.    If he stays in that ballpark, he's fine so far as OBP is concerned.    He's improved a little each year so hopefully that trend continues.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, webbrick2010 said:

It's his defense and his low OBP that will keep him from being a ML starter. He just got dumped from a team in a pennant race, and now he is our SS of the future. PLEAAAAAASE

You love to put words in people's mouths. I don't think anyone has said this guy is the SS of the future. I'm saying that he's a better SS than Hardy/Tejada/Flaherty/old guy FA next year is all. He's an option with a little upside. That's it, dude. Relax.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't believe this thread still has legs anybody here who doesn't think Buck's not going to start Hardy when he comes off the DL is.... O.o the only way he does not start is if he's not healthy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This question just got more interesting with the addition of Beckham. Hardy looked washed up earlier. Was that because he was hurt?  I don't know.  Hardy won't be back next year unless he wants to hang on as a backup. So, I'm leaning towards Beckham. In 239 PA's, Hardy was hitting 211, 248, 308. That's below replacement level. Beckham is 262, 316, 411. That's an OPS 171 pts better.  Hard to bench him for Hardy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, interloper said:

You love to put words in people's mouths. I don't think anyone has said this guy is the SS of the future. I'm saying that he's a better SS than Hardy/Tejada/Flaherty/old guy FA next year is all. He's an option with a little upside. That's it, dude. Relax.

It's not worth engaging him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • Negative feedback loop. Last off-season they rubbed their fanbase off with their lack of moves and $$$ saving.  Then they lose 2,000 fans a game this past year. Will lose more this year probably. They never fully recovered from blowing it up in the early 2000s. Fans left in droves then and never fully came back. Of course part of that is Cleveland is a city in decline too.
    • It's all about stadiums and quality of the facilities. Harry Grove isn't up to snuff as much compared to Bowie or Norfolk. Also the reason why Hagerstown will go way of the dodo as well. It would cost a fortune that Frederick City or County would never pay to upgrade Harry Grove to meet the standard, or whoever has to pick up that tab in the lease agreement. That and Frederick doesn't make any $ because Ziedelis just tells Ken Young what he wants to hear and is a total kissass while the team loses $ every year. Same with Bowie but bowie has a better stadium in terms of being on par with MLB's requirements. The whole "PAY THE MINOR LEAGUERS" campaign was going to resolve in teams being cut because MLB profits would be effected in a big scale and how shrewd MLB is with costs and revenue historically. I called this a year ago in a baseball discord server and it sucks that I'm right. A "livable wage" (if one exists) would only be paid to minor leaguers if teams were cut in predominantly rust belt, more expensive or poorer areas with lacking facilities, and look where we are. Hopefully a resolution passes and hopefully MiLB and MLB will solve this and keep everyone happy, but I highly doubt that happens. As someone who grew up at Harry Grove as a kid, that's going to really suck seeing the keys fold or go to an independent league. Such is the nature of the beast I suppose.    What'll be interesting I suppose is to see how Manfred looks and acts during this debate because apparently the players and owners might go in for extended talks come 2021 when the CBA expires. This is going to show the players how much they can push against this current Commisioner versus what they could push for with Selig. With that being said, it's looking like Manfred will be going in guns blazing and just wanting his way. The thought that lower minor league teams will have to scout and develop their own talent like they did almost 100 years ago proves how cyclical history is.    For further reading, here's a baseball America article going into detail on what we could be seeing, how the agreement with MiLB works, etc. I have work in the morning and need sleep.  https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/mlb-threat-pushes-negotiations-with-milb-to-another-level/
    • Does the team need both Meleeski and Roch?  Seems they could save some money on cutting one of them.
    • I doubt they sell many of these opening day plans.  
    • We will be picking at end of first round.  I dont think picking for need is smart.  We picked need for Elam and Permian and how did that work out.  Pick the best player as injuries always happen. You can always sign a free agent for needs.
    • Don't mean to throw it in the face of a new guy, but we acquired Rucker because of the Rule V draft and not any inefficiency in the market.  We had space in the Rule V draft because of a lack of high quality depth in our minor leagues that would have been subject to the Rule V draft.  
    • I think the shorter DL is a factor, but long DL stints seem to me up as well.    I thought about trying to break down how many stints there were of different lengths, but perhaps that’s a project for another day.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...