Jump to content
Riley Magee

Gray Fenter

Recommended Posts

I hear you guys. I just think the profile is not the same as the typical young, A- player. On paper, the two-pitch mix plays. He's just behind because of injury. 

I'm not saying you're wrong. You two probably know a lot more than me. I just think his arm is worth protecting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I hear you guys. I just think the profile is not the same as the typical young, A- player. On paper, the two-pitch mix plays. He's just behind because of injury. 

I'm not saying you're wrong. You two probably know a lot more than me. I just think his arm is worth protecting.

I think it plays too, but in relief only and the command is fringe and even that hasn't been tested against age appropriate hitters. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

I don't think he gets selected. Teams are risk adverse, even when the stakes are as low as the Rule 5 draft. In order to take a guy in the low minors, teams need to see a significant potential reward. I don't think Fenter provides that. 

Agreed. I think Fenter has some talent and he's an interesting guy, but I'm not sure he's a guy you take in a Rule 5. He has a set up guy upside for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very impressive stat line. Wonder if he's pitching himself into the 40 man roster. We have plenty of room - there are like 15 guys who I'd guess would pass through waivers after this year and only 6 or so other guys to add.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, luismatos4prez said:

Very impressive stat line. Wonder if he's pitching himself into the 40 man roster. We have plenty of room - there are like 15 guys who I'd guess would pass through waivers after this year and only 6 or so other guys to add.

I'm not sure him doing this at Low A will get him added. There is a very outside chance it COULD lead to him getting selected in the Rule 5 though. Wouldn't be the first guy.

But if he was doing this in AA, that'd be a different story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

I'm not sure him doing this at Low A will get him added. There is a very outside chance it COULD lead to him getting selected in the Rule 5 though. Wouldn't be the first guy.

But if he was doing this in AA, that'd be a different story.

I agree. But one of the luxuries of being a really bad ballclub is there is a lot of room on our 40 man roster for next year. 6 or so guys to add. We have 15 or so players on the 40 man roster that ought not be on a ML team's roster and will probably be cut this winter. Why not take advantage of that space on a guy like Fenter? Let him start in Frederick or push him fast as a reliever.

Disclaimer: I've never seen Gray Fenter pitch and am completely scouting the stat line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was at the game last night.  Not sure what Fenter is working on to better his stuff, but he was dominant.  Only two hard hit balls against him - one deep down the left field line but a good 30-50 feet foul and another right at Rizer in right.  I guess this season is about him being healthy, but Fenter should not be in Low A ball, IMO.  

Fenter has a nice over the top delivery that he uses to throw the ball on a downward plane to the bottom of the zone.  He touched 94 a few times last night and has a curveball that is a total mismatch for Low A hitters - at least the ones on the Lakewood Blue Claws.  Not sure of Fenter's upside, but I can't say a team would be crazy to take him in the Rule V draft.

During the Shorebirds four run third, Fenter got out of the dugout and played catch to stay warm.  Had not seen that before.  I asked him how the arm was after the game and he said "good for now, see how it feels tomorrow."

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, hoosiers said:

I was at the game last night.  Not sure what Fenter is working on to better his stuff, but he was dominant.  Only two hard hit balls against him - one deep down the left field line but a good 30-50 feet foul and another right at Rizer in right.  I guess this season is about him being healthy, but Fenter should not be in Low A ball, IMO.  

Fenter has a nice over the top delivery that he uses to throw the ball on a downward plane to the bottom of the zone.  He touched 94 a few times last night and has a curveball that is a total mismatch for Low A hitters - at least the ones on the Lakewood Blue Claws.  Not sure of Fenter's upside, but I can't say a team would be crazy to take him in the Rule V draft.

During the Shorebirds four run third, Fenter got out of the dugout and played catch to stay warm.  Had not seen that before.  I asked him how the arm was after the game and he said "good for now, see how it feels tomorrow."

Good stuff - thanks for posting that.  My view is - It's unlikely someone's going to pick a 23 year old who hasn't even sniffed high A ball, but if they don't have 40 players that need protecting, it makes sense to protect him - classified under the "why take a chance?" theory.     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And maybe that is why Fenter has been left in Low A.  Maybe he has some more velo and can touch 95-96 in relief with a good curveball.  Presumably, we won't have a Rule V pick, but maybe we leave a bunch of guys exposed and lose one and try to pick up a better one.  Luke and Tony can talk more about the stuff - Tony has made comments recently.  As I posted above, I don't think a team would be crazy to take a guy who might hit 95 in relief with a good curveball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Good stuff - thanks for posting that.  My view is - It's unlikely someone's going to pick a 23 year old who hasn't even sniffed high A ball, but if they don't have 40 players that need protecting, it makes sense to protect him - classified under the "why take a chance?" theory.     

With as many guys as the Orioles churn through the 40-man roster both during the regular season and the off-season, there is value in having open slots. You can't have 40 guys on there that you want to keep, you need a few churnable spots for guys that might turn into something, and the small risk of Fenter being taken has to be weighed against the value in holding one of those slots open. The Orioles acquired Ruiz, Nunez, Alberto, and Severino among others through waiver wire churn, so there is real value in keeping slots open.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I checked out Fenter's last start and it's the best I've seen him, the slider was solid average, that's a new pitch this year and it's the first time I've seen this good. The strikethrowing ability with an above average to plus curveball is obviously his best trait. There was directional command, but far from pinpoint. The changeup is below average and not really a useful pitch at all, which hurts the profile to start. Regardless, I'm beginning to wonder if the strategy for keeping in Delmarva is to try to keep him off the Rule 5 radar, he'd likely move quite quickly in relief. 

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Luke-OH said:

I checked out Fenter's last start and it's the best I've seen him, the slider was solid average, that's a new pitch this year and it's the first time I've seen this good. The strikethrowing ability with an above average to plus curveball is obviously his best trait. There was directional command, but far from pinpoint. The changeup is below average and not really a useful pitch at all, which hurts the profile to start. Regardless, I'm beginning to wonder if the strategy for keeping in Delmarva is to try to keep him off the Rule 5 radar, he'd likely move quite quickly in relief. 

I was about to ask that very question....certainly what it seems like to me. Would be fun to see him move through high A and AA quickly next year. If he excels of course

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, ReclaimTheCrown said:

I was about to ask that very question....certainly what it seems like to me. Would be fun to see him move through high A and AA quickly next year. If he excels of course

I’d bet on that in relief, I mean stuff/command wise he compares pretty well to Steven Klimek who has been good in AA. Klimek has a touch better curve but a lesser fastball. Similar command, Fenter might be a bit better. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Luke-OH said:

I’d bet on that in relief, I mean stuff/command wise he compares pretty well to Steven Klimek who has been good in AA. Klimek has a touch better curve but a lesser fastball. Similar command, Fenter might be a bit better. 

You mention Klimek.  In addition to Fenter, I'd say Sedlock, Alvarado, and Peralta all look potential RH setup guys.  That doesn't even count Baumann.  Hannifee may also project as a reliever. We also already have Kline on the 40 man.  Is it really worth protecting any of the Rule 5 eligibles in this group?   Is there anyone who is clearly a cut above?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • So I'm glad you said this because there is some misunderstanding out there about why players are left unprotected. The misconception is that if a player is left unprotected, that means they are viewed as less valuable than the last guy on the 40 man.  This is a common misconception, but this is completely untrue. It's not Unprotected Player vs Last Man on the 40 It's actually Chance of unprotected player getting selected and carried vs Chance that player would have to be DFA at some point if added + the Last Man on the 40
    • He's on waivers, so he can be had just by adding him to the 40, rather than the 26 like the Rule 5.
    • Here's some of my thoughts on the controllable DFA guys (so no Leone, Chen, Duffy, etc).  Explaination of Escobar as the top guy. He has a above average to plus curveball and changeup. He sits in the mid-90s and can run it up into the high 90s. His issue is fastball command, I think it's fixable, he's young and he turns over his fastball the way you would a changeup, imparting a similar spin axis as the change. By staying behind the fastball more, tweaking the release, he'd has less horizontal movement, making it easier to command and also giving it more hop so it'll be a swing and miss pitch up in the zone. Talented arm, the issues are fixable and the Pirates haven't done a great job at developing pitchers.   
    • I'm wondering, how is Jharel Cotton Rule 5 eligible? Is there a certain amount of time in the Majors a play has to be before they are no longer eligible, or is it that he was outrighted to the Minors?
    • Yeah, there are a few guys on the DFA list who are hurt by the juiced ball. Cortes Jr and also more established guys like Chen and Leone. Flyball guys who are seeing typical cans of corn going over the fence. 
    • Or insult the person, he likes to belittle those who disagree with him rather than contest the point. It's one thing if it's a troll, but he does that when presented with an evidence-based good faith argument as well. 
    • Of course you can go wrong.  Any time a GM adds a player without a series of solid, well thought-out and justifiable reasons you've got a problem.  100 losses or not, throwing something against the wall to see if it sticks is not a strategy.  It's certainly not something I would hope to see from Elias and his increasingly impressive staff.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...