Jump to content
Riley Magee

Gray Fenter

Recommended Posts

I hear you guys. I just think the profile is not the same as the typical young, A- player. On paper, the two-pitch mix plays. He's just behind because of injury. 

I'm not saying you're wrong. You two probably know a lot more than me. I just think his arm is worth protecting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I hear you guys. I just think the profile is not the same as the typical young, A- player. On paper, the two-pitch mix plays. He's just behind because of injury. 

I'm not saying you're wrong. You two probably know a lot more than me. I just think his arm is worth protecting.

I think it plays too, but in relief only and the command is fringe and even that hasn't been tested against age appropriate hitters. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

I don't think he gets selected. Teams are risk adverse, even when the stakes are as low as the Rule 5 draft. In order to take a guy in the low minors, teams need to see a significant potential reward. I don't think Fenter provides that. 

Agreed. I think Fenter has some talent and he's an interesting guy, but I'm not sure he's a guy you take in a Rule 5. He has a set up guy upside for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very impressive stat line. Wonder if he's pitching himself into the 40 man roster. We have plenty of room - there are like 15 guys who I'd guess would pass through waivers after this year and only 6 or so other guys to add.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, luismatos4prez said:

Very impressive stat line. Wonder if he's pitching himself into the 40 man roster. We have plenty of room - there are like 15 guys who I'd guess would pass through waivers after this year and only 6 or so other guys to add.

I'm not sure him doing this at Low A will get him added. There is a very outside chance it COULD lead to him getting selected in the Rule 5 though. Wouldn't be the first guy.

But if he was doing this in AA, that'd be a different story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

I'm not sure him doing this at Low A will get him added. There is a very outside chance it COULD lead to him getting selected in the Rule 5 though. Wouldn't be the first guy.

But if he was doing this in AA, that'd be a different story.

I agree. But one of the luxuries of being a really bad ballclub is there is a lot of room on our 40 man roster for next year. 6 or so guys to add. We have 15 or so players on the 40 man roster that ought not be on a ML team's roster and will probably be cut this winter. Why not take advantage of that space on a guy like Fenter? Let him start in Frederick or push him fast as a reliever.

Disclaimer: I've never seen Gray Fenter pitch and am completely scouting the stat line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was at the game last night.  Not sure what Fenter is working on to better his stuff, but he was dominant.  Only two hard hit balls against him - one deep down the left field line but a good 30-50 feet foul and another right at Rizer in right.  I guess this season is about him being healthy, but Fenter should not be in Low A ball, IMO.  

Fenter has a nice over the top delivery that he uses to throw the ball on a downward plane to the bottom of the zone.  He touched 94 a few times last night and has a curveball that is a total mismatch for Low A hitters - at least the ones on the Lakewood Blue Claws.  Not sure of Fenter's upside, but I can't say a team would be crazy to take him in the Rule V draft.

During the Shorebirds four run third, Fenter got out of the dugout and played catch to stay warm.  Had not seen that before.  I asked him how the arm was after the game and he said "good for now, see how it feels tomorrow."

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, hoosiers said:

I was at the game last night.  Not sure what Fenter is working on to better his stuff, but he was dominant.  Only two hard hit balls against him - one deep down the left field line but a good 30-50 feet foul and another right at Rizer in right.  I guess this season is about him being healthy, but Fenter should not be in Low A ball, IMO.  

Fenter has a nice over the top delivery that he uses to throw the ball on a downward plane to the bottom of the zone.  He touched 94 a few times last night and has a curveball that is a total mismatch for Low A hitters - at least the ones on the Lakewood Blue Claws.  Not sure of Fenter's upside, but I can't say a team would be crazy to take him in the Rule V draft.

During the Shorebirds four run third, Fenter got out of the dugout and played catch to stay warm.  Had not seen that before.  I asked him how the arm was after the game and he said "good for now, see how it feels tomorrow."

Good stuff - thanks for posting that.  My view is - It's unlikely someone's going to pick a 23 year old who hasn't even sniffed high A ball, but if they don't have 40 players that need protecting, it makes sense to protect him - classified under the "why take a chance?" theory.     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And maybe that is why Fenter has been left in Low A.  Maybe he has some more velo and can touch 95-96 in relief with a good curveball.  Presumably, we won't have a Rule V pick, but maybe we leave a bunch of guys exposed and lose one and try to pick up a better one.  Luke and Tony can talk more about the stuff - Tony has made comments recently.  As I posted above, I don't think a team would be crazy to take a guy who might hit 95 in relief with a good curveball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Good stuff - thanks for posting that.  My view is - It's unlikely someone's going to pick a 23 year old who hasn't even sniffed high A ball, but if they don't have 40 players that need protecting, it makes sense to protect him - classified under the "why take a chance?" theory.     

With as many guys as the Orioles churn through the 40-man roster both during the regular season and the off-season, there is value in having open slots. You can't have 40 guys on there that you want to keep, you need a few churnable spots for guys that might turn into something, and the small risk of Fenter being taken has to be weighed against the value in holding one of those slots open. The Orioles acquired Ruiz, Nunez, Alberto, and Severino among others through waiver wire churn, so there is real value in keeping slots open.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I checked out Fenter's last start and it's the best I've seen him, the slider was solid average, that's a new pitch this year and it's the first time I've seen this good. The strikethrowing ability with an above average to plus curveball is obviously his best trait. There was directional command, but far from pinpoint. The changeup is below average and not really a useful pitch at all, which hurts the profile to start. Regardless, I'm beginning to wonder if the strategy for keeping in Delmarva is to try to keep him off the Rule 5 radar, he'd likely move quite quickly in relief. 

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Luke-OH said:

I checked out Fenter's last start and it's the best I've seen him, the slider was solid average, that's a new pitch this year and it's the first time I've seen this good. The strikethrowing ability with an above average to plus curveball is obviously his best trait. There was directional command, but far from pinpoint. The changeup is below average and not really a useful pitch at all, which hurts the profile to start. Regardless, I'm beginning to wonder if the strategy for keeping in Delmarva is to try to keep him off the Rule 5 radar, he'd likely move quite quickly in relief. 

I was about to ask that very question....certainly what it seems like to me. Would be fun to see him move through high A and AA quickly next year. If he excels of course

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, ReclaimTheCrown said:

I was about to ask that very question....certainly what it seems like to me. Would be fun to see him move through high A and AA quickly next year. If he excels of course

I’d bet on that in relief, I mean stuff/command wise he compares pretty well to Steven Klimek who has been good in AA. Klimek has a touch better curve but a lesser fastball. Similar command, Fenter might be a bit better. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Luke-OH said:

I’d bet on that in relief, I mean stuff/command wise he compares pretty well to Steven Klimek who has been good in AA. Klimek has a touch better curve but a lesser fastball. Similar command, Fenter might be a bit better. 

You mention Klimek.  In addition to Fenter, I'd say Sedlock, Alvarado, and Peralta all look potential RH setup guys.  That doesn't even count Baumann.  Hannifee may also project as a reliever. We also already have Kline on the 40 man.  Is it really worth protecting any of the Rule 5 eligibles in this group?   Is there anyone who is clearly a cut above?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • Lol. Because we have to room to make our 2 rule 5 selections. 
    • I’m torn on Mckenna. I see your points about Fry and Armstrong. I think we have some relievers that would be “good” if they were on a team that could use them in traditional ways. Like Fry, Scott, Armstrong, Castro, and even Bleier, but we’re not a traditional team. We’re a team struggling to cover innings.  That’s why I Was surprised we let Ynoa and Brooks both go. I could see one but not both. Those were two guys you could stick in any game and say you just gotta eat innings.  Having one inning relievers on this team is pretty pointless, outside of Givens.  Will we be able to do the Norfolk shuttle now, since there really aren’t those guys on the roster now to shuttle up and down?  They’re now prospects that we’d like to leave in their SP regimen. 
    • Why would anyone need to be DFAd in that scenario with five open roster spaces?
    • The O's really needs to add  near term starters.  And to sign them Elias may have to offer a 40 man roster spots.  I see Armstrong and Fry vulnerable to being left go in order to sign some guys that offer more innings. Wojo types.   Kyle Moore says Fenter has three plus pitches.  As bad as the O's need starters I can't see  them exposing a guy like that to the draft.  Even if he ends of being a multi inning reliever if he has three plus pitches he is too good to expose IMO. If the O's had the room I would protect McKenna but when I try to fit him on the 40 man with the need for starters, long relievers and adding Mountcastle I run out of room.  
    • Thanks for the great analysis @Tony-OH @Luke-OH.   Do you guys think Mullins has been officially asked to give up switch hitting?  
    • 26 man roster thought... A six man rotation would benefit everyone. I know, I know... we can barely find 5 SP(really 3), but it could allow us to start Harvey in 3IP stints, and go from there.  Means - would his fb play up, or could it hurt the feel for his secondaries? Bundy - always benefits from the extra rest  Cobb - has been hurt the last two years, so... Wojo - his stuff could play up Akin - a good way to break him into the MLB.  Wasn’t going deep into AAA starts. Harvey - we get to see if he can start with extra rest and a controlled environment. Also this would be a good way to introduce future pitching prospects as either spot starters or for long relief one game. Or why couldn’t we just piggyback guys like they do in the minors to start the year. What is the downside?  We lose 110 instead of 105?
    • Just reminds of how strange a year 2012 was. Roberts was a non-contributor to that team. I can’t say I be same about Markakis, he just caught a tough break from CC. The first time we make the playoffs after all those years and those two weren’t factors in the playoffs. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...