Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Moose Milligan

2018 Orioles...if you could add one Oriole HoFer...

Recommended Posts

I think we do this every year.  If you could add one Oriole Hall of Famer to this years team...who would you pick?

Cal Ripken - 3B/SS

Frank Robinson - RF

Brooks Robinson - 3B

Eddie Murray - 1B

Jim Palmer- SP

Earl Weaver - Manager

 

I think for me, the obvious choice would be an in his prime Jim Palmer.  That was my gut reaction.  But after seeing how terrible Chris Davis has been, I think anyone who says Eddie Murray could feel justified.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

It's always about the pitching.   Palmer was the best we've ever had and I would choose him from this list.

I'd go with Palmer, like I said.

However, I'd be worried about how his stuff would translate to todays game.  So much emphasis is placed on k/9 rate and he peaked at 6.0 during his prime.  He always had a really good defense behind him and this years defense would be classified as average at best.

The Murray option becomes more intriguing to me because you'd have a gold glove switch hitting first baseman that has some OBP skills and some power.  I think that would be a big boost to our offense and defense.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread could be misconstrued to mean someone that's in the Orioles hall of fame. But since I'm pretty sure you mean the big Hall of Fame. I'll say Jim Palmer.

Otherwise I'd have said Mike Mussina. Considering how many of his contemporaries had trouble pitching in Camden Yards as an Oriole. With the likes of David Wells, Kevin Brown, and Sid Fernandez.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I think we do this every year.  If you could add one Oriole Hall of Famer to this years team...who would you pick?

Cal Ripken - 3B/SS

Frank Robinson - RF

Brooks Robinson - 3B

Eddie Murray - 1B

Jim Palmer- SP

Earl Weaver - Manager

 

I think for me, the obvious choice would be an in his prime Jim Palmer.  That was my gut reaction.  But after seeing how terrible Chris Davis has been, I think anyone who says Eddie Murray could feel justified.  

Just because Murray is on the team doesn't mean Davis will get benched.  Davis at first Murray to DH. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Just because Murray is on the team doesn't mean Davis will get benched.  Davis at first Murray to DH. 

Murray in his prime was a much better fielder than Davis is now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, clapdiddy said:

Murray in his prime was a much better fielder than Davis is now.

What does that have to do with anything?

Davis still has that contract.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

What does that have to do with anything?

Davis still has that contract.

I'm just saying that you could put Davis at DH and Murray at 1B.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, clapdiddy said:

I'm just saying that you could put Davis at DH and Murray at 1B.   

Sure you could.  Early enough in Murray's career I would.

Doesn't mean that is what would actually happen.

Now if the OP had said we could replace any one player with an Oriole Hall of Famer, it would be a more interesting topic.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sure you could.  Early enough in Murray's career I would.

Doesn't mean that is what would actually happen.

Now if the OP had said we could replace any one player with an Oriole Hall of Famer, it would be a more interesting topic.

Agreed.  Murray for Davis would be a no-brainer.   Especially at his 29 year-old salary of around 1.5 M.  :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I'd go with Palmer, like I said.

However, I'd be worried about how his stuff would translate to todays game.  So much emphasis is placed on k/9 rate and he peaked at 6.0 during his prime.  He always had a really good defense behind him and this years defense would be classified as average at best.

The Murray option becomes more intriguing to me because you'd have a gold glove switch hitting first baseman that has some OBP skills and some power.  I think that would be a big boost to our offense and defense.  

Palmer's high fastball might have made him more like the aforementioned Sid Fernandez at Camden Yards now that I think about it more. Interesting to think about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I guess it depends on the mindset.  If the big contract was the important thing to you I can see why you wouldn't want to risk losing money by testing positive.
    • Obviously, it's money related but it's also roster related. They believe, and I believe, that they won't lose anything with the extra AB's Stewart and Mullins are likely to get with this move.  Good point by SG for keeping Nunez for depth for now but the better point by Frobby.  At 26 years old Elias apparently feels Nunez is what he is.  A 750-820 OPS go with no defensive value and extremely streaky.  Is it worth 2M to make sure that's all he is?  
    • Beats me.  But I don't believe anyone who's had a bit of success at the ML level while juicing stops taking them, especially after they've bagged a big contract.  
    • I will say it seems strange that Nunez doesn't have some trade value vs a DFA. His avg exit velocity really fell off last year but his WOBA  has increased every year he's been with the Orioles to his career best .341 (MLB avg of .317) though his xWOBA fell to .301 (.321 MLB average) suggesting he was a little lucky last year. His defensive really fell off to the point that he's a DH, which of course puts a lot of pressure on his bat. With Mancini returning, and Stewart needing everyday at bats and an outfield that is getting crowded in a good way (Mountcastle, Stewart, Hays, Santander and Mullins and Diaz at some point perhaps), he's in a bit of a roster crunch.  I'd like to think a guy who was on pace to hit 30+ home runs at 26 years old with a good solid barrel percentage (80 MLB percentile) would have more value, but with offensive numbers continuing to rise, I guess is you bring no defensive value your bat needs to be special, and Nunez is a streaky hitter who can be special at times, but eventually ends up slightly better than average offensively.  Do I think money is involved in this decision? Yeah, I think it would be naïve to say that his arbitration number wasn't a factor. Was it the only factor, no because as I pointed out, there's going to be a crunch for PAs next year between 1B, DH and corner outfield.  As for Davis, it's quite clear that with COVID still lingering, the question on whether a full season will happen next year looms big on whether to finally cut bait on him. It's clear that Davis has no intention of doing the right thing and retiring, so he will continue to embarrass himself and any remaining legacy so he can cash some big checks in the future that he hasn't earned. It's certainly his right to do so. Also, with the CBA coming up, maybe the Orioles think they will save money from his albatross contract if the players strike? It's clear he's only still on the roster because the Orioles are exploring all ways to try and get out of paying him. Nunez was a decent stick, but his defensive woes really cut onto his value and at the end of the day, it seems Elias has decided he rather give those DH at bats to others.  
    • I have a theory. No better than your average CoC theory.  I believe pretty strongly that he did them.  Why stop?  Well, once he bagged his big contract, he may have felt the health risks and the low risk of getting caught were not worth it.  Perhaps he had a health scare or just being married and having a young family made him reevaluate the health risks. I know that he lost a lot of body mass over the last 5 years.  He says he was slow to change his swing because he had prior success.   Then why lose muscle and mass purposely if that's the way you were when you had all your success? No idea on Brady.  He still hit like 24 homers after the 50 homer season.  He may have used but that seadon was an aberration either way.  Like Davey Johnson in 73.  If you believe Brady used, I don't think the seasons after the 50 homer season necessarily mean that he stopped.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...