Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Wright vs. Tillman vs. anybody else

Recommended Posts

As a competitor, I like Chris Tillman much better than Mike Wright.   Tillman is more resourceful, more mature and a more steady person.  

Irrelevant.    Tillman seemingly can’t pitch anymore.   His velocity is way worse than Wright, his command is worse (which is saying something) and he can’t get it done even on his good days, much less his bad ones.    Wright at least will give you a decent game one day out of three.    Gun to my head, I’d rather take my chances with Wright right now. 

Personally, I’d be on the phone with Scott Feldman right now and get him to Sarasota tomorrow.   And, I’d be ready to try Aquino or Hess in a week or two if Wright doesn’t have a decent start in the next two.

As to Tillman, he can agree to go to  Norfolk after he’s DFA and try to get his act together there.    Or, he can choose another path.   But he needs to be off our roster.  

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wright is much better than Tillman right now. With Tillman, you're essentially conceding the game before it starts while Wright at least gives you a shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Miguel Castro.   The guy has three pitches and throws upper 90's.   He might suck but he's got some upside and we already have Araujo, Givens, O'Day, and Brach in the bullpen.   I'd like to see Castro get 3-4 starts and see if he can go 5 decent innings as the 5th starter.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

Miguel Castro.   The guy has three pitches and throws upper 90's.   He might suck but he's got some upside and we already have Araujo, Givens, O'Day, and Brach in the bullpen.   I'd like to see Castro get 3-4 starts and see if he can go 5 decent innings as the 5th starter.

His command is terrible. IMO he'd be almost as bad as Tillman, if not worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, amdcpus said:

His command is terrible. IMO he'd be almost as bad as Tillman, if not worse.

Tillman is toast and Mike Wright has proven time and again that he can't do it.   Best in house solutions are bullpen guys.    Castro, Bleier, and even Araujo in that order.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

David Hess

Really?  Based on one good AAA start?   Too early.  He was just okay in his second try in AA last year.   Give him at least 5 AAA starts to earn it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RZNJ said:

Really?  Based on one good AAA start?   Too early.  He was just okay in his second try in AA last year.   Give him at least 5 AAA starts to earn it.

Based on a discussion between Mike Wright and Chris Tillman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

Tillman is toast and Mike Wright has proven time and again that he can't do it.   Best in house solutions are bullpen guys.    Castro, Bleier, and even Araujo in that order.

Bleier would get smoked as a starter. I'm not ready to give up on Wright just yet, he's only pitched 150 innings in the majors so far, which is less than 1 season's worth for a regular starter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, amdcpus said:

Bleier would get smoked as a starter. I'm not ready to give up on Wright just yet, he's only pitched 150 innings in the majors so far, which is less than 1 season's worth for a regular starter.

You said Miguel Castro had terrible command.   He looks like Greg Maddux compared to Mike Wright.   Mike Wright can't sequence 3 good pitches in a row.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Miguel Castro.   The guy has three pitches and throws upper 90's.   He might suck but he's got some upside and we already have Araujo, Givens, O'Day, and Brach in the bullpen.   I'd like to see Castro get 3-4 starts and see if he can go 5 decent innings as the 5th starter.

I’d be fine trying that too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Really?  Based on one good AAA start?   Too early.  He was just okay in his second try in AA last year.   Give him at least 5 AAA starts to earn it.

I love Hess but agree, he’s not quite ready.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Really?  Based on one good AAA start?   Too early.  He was just okay in his second try in AA last year.   Give him at least 5 AAA starts to earn it.

Hess was also better than “just okay” last season. He had a few rough outings, mostly in the first half of the season, but was very good from late June on. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Yaz played the instrument for years and wasn’t good.  He deserved nothing and didn’t earn anything.
    • Yeah, I don't consider returning a Rule 5 guy to be a fail.  In fact, it is the most likely result, league-wide.  I really consider taking Rule 5 shots at guys to be a matter of nothing ventured, nothing gained.  Also, IMO, picking up stop gap players and have them turn out to be exactly that isn't really a fail, either.  Sure, I'd like to see us strike gold on one of these guys, but I can't say that I expect it to happen.  I'm more interested in seeing how guys we acquire like Vavra and Smith turn out.
    • So? The guys we brought up for a chance, every guy brought up for a chance, as opposed to bringing up “because he is ready,” is by definition being given an opportunity that he doesn’t necessarily deserve. We risk nothing by bringing him up. I’m a musician, and I can’t judge a piece without paying it once. Maybe not all the way through, but gotta sit down and play it. Now, it might be by a terrible or unknown composer, and some would say,”it’s by Danzi, it sucks.” Well, so? Maybe it does suck. Danzi was a mediocre composer. But maybe it doesn’t suck. Maybe it’s worthwhile, as recital filler, or as a rare gem from a mediocrity. But if I play it, I’ll know. As another surprisingly similar example, the widow of a local cellist gave me some of her late husband’s music, including an untouched piece he bought 50+ years ago. So rare there’s only one lonely YouTube audio, and the music is long out of print and the publisher is itself long out of business. I played it and said, “this is an incredible piece.” And it is. So this piece is Yaz. The previous owner never bothered to play it, and I did, and I get the benefit. If he’d played lit, maybe he’d have hated it, maybe not. But he never gave it a chance.
    • Well let’s remember that a lot of parts of that system that are good were here before Elias got here.
    • Interesting analysis. Not sure I agree on all points but from my perspective I look at the Elias-Sig regime as a definite 5 year project and as I have stated before I don't start grading until after 2021 and possibly 2022 as one full season and 60 games is no legitimate yardstick. Not having minor league baseball is a definite setback but the fact our Farm System is graded #8 is big plus and the FO deserves some credit here. In summary, rebuilding a 47 win team is going to be a major task and it's going to take several years to turn the corner. I think we all need patience and lots of it realistically.
    • I think it’s pretty easy to identify talent and where guys are blocked. Its not simple to acquire it but it certainly and can and should be done.
    • I mean I guess but guys are on waivers for a reason..they aren’t good.  You take a shot and see if you can catch lightning in a bottle but for the most part, all you hope for is someone to take up at bats while you wait for younger players to develop. I would never really expect a guy to be claimed off of waivers and turn out to be good.  I wouldn’t expect a rule 5 guy to be anything more than a mediocre role player. Sometimes you get lucky and they become more than that but usually, they are as likely to be DFa’ed as they are to make a minimal contribution. I think complaining about the lack of productivity from these types of guys is a relative waste of time.  Where I think you do complain is that Elias hasn’t gotten better players.  That’s my complaint.  You have some resources to get better players, go get them.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...