Jump to content
HokieOs

30 wins or August 1?

Recommended Posts

Playing off of today's 20 wins or 50 losses thread, which do you think happens first? Do we score 11 more wins between now and the end of July? Or do we limp into August with <30 wins?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, atomic said:

Well Beckham and Rasmussen will be back soon so we should really start pumping out the wins. 

I think you meant Rasputin. A mystical man with godlike powers We need him fast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, HokieOs said:

Playing off of today's 20 wins or 50 losses thread, which do you think happens first? Do we score 11 more wins between now and the end of July? Or do we limp into August with <30 wins?

They will win eleven plus games. Even without Jones, Machado, and Britton. Maybe Brach and Casner as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, HokieOs said:

Playing off of today's 20 wins or 50 losses thread, which do you think happens first? Do we score 11 more wins between now and the end of July? Or do we limp into August with <30 wins?

August will be here before this team wins 30. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say 30 wins they only need to win 11 out of next 40.  However most the teams are over .500 in that stretch and we have 5 wins total vs teams over .500.   If the get 11 that puts them at 30 and 79 on the year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, HokieOs said:

Playing off of today's 20 wins or 50 losses thread, which do you think happens first? Do we score 11 more wins between now and the end of July? Or do we limp into August with <30 wins?

Well 50 loses is it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think it's impossible to sustain this level of badness for that long, especially since our pitching has not been that awful.

At SOME point, we are going to go on a tear and play .400 ball for a whole month or something like that.   A super-hot stretch of 12-18 or something, that will pump our season-win pace from the 40s all the way into the 50s.

It's gonna happen.  It has to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SteveA said:

I still think it's impossible to sustain this level of badness for that long, especially since our pitching has not been that awful.

At SOME point, we are going to go on a tear and play .400 ball for a whole month or something like that.   A super-hot stretch of 12-18 or something, that will pump our season-win pace from the 40s all the way into the 50s.

It's gonna happen.  It has to.

I respectfully disagree.  I think they're already mailing it in.  Keep in mind, the roster should change.  Manny should get traded (I still have my doubts), maybe some others.  

We've seen them go on "tears" this year.  Taking two from the Mets.  The Mother's Day game outburst, then right back to sucking.  

Any bright spot has quickly been covered up with twice the amount of bad baseball.  Terrible offense that isn't changing, terrible defense.  Pitching is average, at best.  If you are going to have a dead last ranked offense, an awful defense and mediocre pitching, there's not a lot of wins on the horizon.  This season has gone way past "small sample size".  This is who they are.

That said, I think they can get closer to 30 wins by Aug 1 but I'm not betting on it.  Let's look at the schedule:

After this, we play the Nats which is usually good for us because we've seemed to have had their number for years.  Then 3 against the Braves who are good this year.  The Mariners come to town, followed by the Angels, both having strong seasons.

Into July, we get the Phillies who are respectable, then the Twins who we should be able to hold our own with.  4 games against the Yankees.  Then the Rangers, who we should be able to hold our own against, too.  All Star Break.  Jays, then BoSox, Tampa.  Last day of July is a game against the Yankees.

I don't see 11 wins there.  Not with that many games against our division and other strong teams.  

Look at it this way: that's 11 series there (and a random makeup game against the Phillies thrown in). The Orioles would have to take at least 1 game in each of those series to get to 30.  With their propensity of getting swept lately and the losing streaks, combined with the fact that they're going to trade their only bright spot or two on offense, I just don't see it happening.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think right now the only way we see higher level of play is trading a bunch of vets and then you have young players, minor leaguers and AAAA players feeling like it is their chance to shine and earn a spot for somewhere in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm starting to wonder if they'll win 30 games by the end of the season, let alone by the end of July.

This team is REAL bad, and with trades coming (hopefully), I think the only chance we may see a little better baseball is after trades and the young guys brought up bring better energy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, HokieOs said:

Playing off of today's 20 wins or 50 losses thread, which do you think happens first? Do we score 11 more wins between now and the end of July? Or do we limp into August with <30 wins?

30 wins???!!! 

 

Let's talk about this teams execution!

 

Im in favor of it... ;) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Would that be true even if it’s public? I suppose the question has already been answered, and the owners stepped over the line, but how fine is the line? Was there any punishment for an owner who defied the directive and signed a high dollar free agent anyway? Was it even a directive, actually a direct order, a command or majority vote of the owners? Or was it just, “I don’t think you should do this because it’s not financially wise“?  If the very act of discussing the issue is itself grounds for agreements, that seems a little draconian.
    • They will have to adjust to a system that matches the QB. I’m sure Bill B is prepared to exploit Cam’s strength. He is not a traditional pocket passer anymore than Jackson is. They can preserve him somewhat by reducing or eliminating the planned run plays. I don’t think you can get rid of the plays where Cam will take off as that’s who he is.
    • I wouldn't give Lamar a long term contract.  Just Franchise him for a couple of years and then let him go.  I can't see him being effective as a running quarterback after 7 years.  How many running backs are effective after 7 years of starting?
    • If they're coordinating together, it's collusion. Having a meeting and creating some type of agreement qualifies as that - so the bolded sentence would definitely be that. They're also not free to do business however they please - they agreed to a collective bargaining agreement with the players. And they're also beholden to national anti-trust legislation like the Sherman Act that doesn't allow that sort of thing.
    • It would be wrong to call a meeting of the general managers and tell them they should not spend so much money on free agents: 1) Each GM should be able to figure that out on their own for each FA player. 2) Telling all the GMs that is grounds for the Union to file a grievance.
    • Well I don’t remember reading that in your original post, but yes that would be the very poster child of collusion. However, publicly saying, “it is stupid to sign a washed up veteran for too much money,” Is neither wrong, nor wrong. And it would be not wrong to publicly say, “the owners shouldn’t spend so much money on free agents” And it probably wouldn’t be wrong to say, “I’m going to have a meeting of all the general managers and tell them that they shouldn’t pay so much money to free agents because they aren’t worth it.”  After all, if they are free to do business as they wish, and they all agree that high dollar free agents are overvalued, that may be a fine line between “collusion“ and “good business practice.“ I’m not attempting to argue against what happened, just Wondering if it would still have been collusion if the owners had publicly explained that it was bad business?
    • It amazes me that people that were so angry when I suggested that you shouldn't feed your kids hot dogs and sodas are now so worried about ccvid. Heart Disease deaths in this country are 650k a year. Strokes kill 140k a year in the US and Diabetes 85k. And 620k from Diabetes.     The same thing that makes you at risk from dying from covid is the same thing that puts you at risk from dying from Heart Disease, Diabetes and stroke.  Yet I have yet to hear anyone else say they have given up processed food, meats, and exercising and eating more fruits and vegetables more since Covid started.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...