Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Legend_Of_Joey

Colby Rasmus placed on Restricted list

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, amdcpus said:

I'm not saying Jay is amazing, I'm just pointing out how he would have been a significantly better choice than Rasmus.

He would have made zero difference to this team. Zero. You picked the wrong thing to bust the Os for. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, amdcpus said:

What a disaster of a signing. I guess Jon Jay didn't meet our standards though...

Terrible move by the O's signing him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SteveA said:

Anyobe gonna volunteer to start the Colby Rasmus Appreciation Thread?

Don't let the door hit you in the ass. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, amdcpus said:

What a disaster of a signing. I guess Jon Jay didn't meet our standards though...

I wouldn't call this a disaster. More of a wasted signing. Chris Davis is a disaster signing. This was low risk, moderate reward. And we got no reward. In the scheme of this season, it's a meh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Rene88 said:

Somebody posted something about Radmus’ father on Twitter. Don’t know much about him really, can anyone provide the backstory?

Maybe it's better if they keep that quite. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And they were sooooo worried about maybe Nick having a bad fourth year, but the moronic outfielder signings since then have been endemic.  

And once again, is there anybody in this organization willing to say..”You know what, that signing was my idea and what the heck could I have been thinking? My bad, I apologize to the Oriole fans for signing this yahoo.”

Crickets.  The board seems to pretty much think this was all Buck.  Where are the Angelos haters that want to say...oh, it was a secret Angelos plot, he always coveted idiot right fielders with bad haircuts who can’t play...And of course Dan gets his usual,  “it wasn’t me, I just work here”  pass...cause he was just in the Warehouse playing Word for Friends and updating his resume when the signing of Rasmus was announced.  

The epic, farcical, tragic quality of this organization does have a humorous component to it. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

And they were sooooo worried about maybe Nick having a bad fourth year, but the moronic outfielder signings since then have been endemic.  

And once again, is there anybody in this organization willing to say..”You know what, that signing was my idea and what the heck could I have been thinking? My bad, I apologize to the Oriole fans for signing this yahoo.”

Crickets.  The board seems to pretty much think this was all Buck.  Where are the Angelos haters that want to say...oh, it was a secret Angelos plot, he always coveted idiot right fielders with bad haircuts who can’t play...And of course Dan gets his usual,  “it wasn’t me, I just work here”  pass...cause he was just in the Warehouse playing Word for Friends and updating his resume when the signing of Rasmus was announced.  

The epic, farcical, tragic quality of this organization does have a humorous component to it. 

 

Gross oversimplification of the issues.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it was an awful signing and yes he was as bad as feared, but this should be celebratory!

Dude literally walked away - from the money and the playing time - two things that could be put to better use now.  This is an opportunity!!!

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, atomic said:

What difference does it make?   It's not like it matters if we lose the game tonight. 

Why so negative?  Be positive!  Sun is shining, birds are chirping!

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

The guy did us a favor by going home so far as I’m concerned.    There’s got to be a better use for that $1.5 mm at some point in the future.     Count me as happy, and I’ll live with the one day of playing short.  

There is a better use for that 1.5 million, it's called the international draft and the Orioles pissed all over it yesterday.  

In regards to Jon Jay vs. Rasmus, Jon Jay would have been the better signing, strictly from the perspective that he wasn't the one who quit on his team last year on a bum hip.  Jon Jay isn't a piker.  Colby Rasmus is a piker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

It does seem like RF has been basically cursed since Markakis left. 

How simple is this...Put Rickard there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Natty said:

How simple is this...Put Rickard there.

You do want the curse to end right?

 

(not that I believe in curses)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Gross oversimplification of the issues.

My specialty.  Since no coherent explanation was ever offered to me by the Orioles as a customer, I just come to my own oversimplified distorted ones.  Was the fourth year for Nick not the complete and total issue?  It sure seemed that way to me.  That his supposed health neck issues spooked them to not want to risk a fourth year...were there other reasons?  I mean since being a warrior in our division winning year, being a true Oriole and team leader...none of that seemed to add up to squat in their calculations.  But maybe I misread the whole deal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, tntoriole said:

My specialty.  Since no coherent explanation was ever offered to me by the Orioles as a customer, I just come to my own oversimplified distorted ones.  Was the fourth year for Nick not the complete and total issue?  It sure seemed that way to me.  That his supposed health neck issues spooked them to not want to risk a fourth year...were there other reasons?  I mean since being a warrior in our division winning year, being a true Oriole and team leader...none of that seemed to add up to squat in their calculations.  But maybe I misread the whole deal. 

Like I said, an oversimplification.

Despite the medicals they were willing to go three years on Markakis.  The addition of the fourth year increased the risk to an untenable level.  That does not mean that they figured he would be unable to perform in year four.

There also existed performance based issues tied to his diminishing power and defensive ability.

I don't think anyone expected a situation in which Markakis kinda puttered around for three years and then suddenly he's putting up his best numbers in a decade at 34.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Talk about "lack of imagination..." -- I'm talking about the ZiPS figures, not Szymborski or the Orioles. Hardly seems worth running the projections over five years if there's so little variation from year to year for each of those players. Maybe I'm just spoiled by wildly fluctuating careers in baseball sim games... or reality itself.
    • Wow, I'm shocked to see we're technically still in it. I basically called it done a couple of losses ago. But how could I forget, it ain't over till it's over! 6 games left, so basically the O's have been in contention for 90 percent of the season. Who'd a thunk?
    • The original intention is to stock up on international players which he’s also done. 
    • Well, we're up against it now.   Toronto beat the Yankees tonight.  There's now only one way the O's can make the playoffs: 1) Sweep the Red Sox 2) Toronto loses three to the Yankees the next three days 3) Seattle loses at least 2 games ([email protected], 4 vs Oak)*     *If Seattle goes 5-1 or better, we would still be OK if Houston loses at least 5 of their last 6 (2vsSea, 4 vs Tex) 4) Angels lose at least 1 more game (2 vs SD, 3 @Dodgers)
    • o   (vs. DEVIL RAYS, 9/21)   deGrom had 14 Strikeouts over 7 Inning Pitched tonight ...... but he was charged with a loss, as his Mets fell by a score of 2-1.   https://www.espn.com/mlb/boxscore?gameId=401226481   For the 2020 season overall, deGrom has a 2.14 ERA and an 0.921 WHIP.   o
    • “Keegan Akin started in the bullpen this year with the Baltimore Orioles but has since moved to the rotation. So far it has been paying off for the Orioles as the rookie has been nothing short of impressive. In four starts Akin has produced a 2.35 ERA, 1.62 FIP, 36.4 K%, and 15.5 SwStr%. What is even more impressive is who he put those numbers up against. In those four starts he has faced the Yankees twice, the Braves, and the Blue Jays. All very formidable offenses.  “The only issue with Akin besides the small sample size is that he lives in the zone a little too much. He has a low O-Swing% of 26.3% which means hitters aren’t chasing him outside of the zone. With command issues stemming from the minors he also might be hesitant to live outside the zone and risk walking too many hitters. This is definitely something we have to monitor.   “Akin’s main strength is his fastball which has above average movement in both vertical and horizontal movement. While it doesn’t have much velocity the movement of the pitch makes up for it. He also places it well trying to place it high in the zone as often as possible. That fastball is paired with a changeup that straight up fools hitters. It comes in 10 mph slower than his fastball with late vertical drop at the bottom of the zone. His changeup currently holds an impressive 20.3 SwStr%. “As for 2021 Akin will be an interesting pitcher to evaluate. A very small sample size alone puts a lot of this into question. But with what looks like a solid fastball/changeup combination he will be worth a shot towards the end of drafts.” https://fantasy.fangraphs.com/analyzing-rookie-pitchers-part-ii/
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...