Jump to content
weams

Orioles Deal Gausman/O'Day to Braves - Schoop to Brewers

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The more I look at it the more I think the Brewers trade was great. 

Carmona is a stud SS. 

Ortiz was a former 1st round pick that has 4 pitches. Already in AA. 

Villar has been worth 1.8 WAR this year. Even before the trades he’d be our 2nd best player WAR wise. 

Three weeks ago this would’ve been laughed at. Schoop is a decent upgrade over Villar but we get Villar through 2021.  

And Villar is under control through 2020 (a fact which really surprises me, seems like he has been around long enough that he should be closer to free agency).

So he can help stabilize the middle infield behind our pitchers for a few years while we wait for our system to start producing some middle infield talent.

For 1 year + 2 months of Schoop, this looks like a decent deal.

Gausman deal does not look good IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Moose Milligan said:

Ok, you're talking about trading for teams stud prospects by taking on bad contracts in return, correct?  

I'm talking about not sacrificing prospect returns.  And what is actually the smarter payroll strategy during a real build.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Their payroll has been pretty stripped, with not much commitments starting next year and especially in 2020. What are the odds Manny coming back is in the cards now? What do you do with the freed up money?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Someone help me here.   Looks like two franchise ruining trades.

But now we can use minor league players in the big leagues. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Can someone please tell me how taking on Villar makes sense for this team? He's under contract for two frickin' years.

Flip him next year.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The players the Pirates gave up for Archer make me scratch my head even more. I mean, I'm not a minor league savant, but I've certainly heard of Meadows and Glasnow. 

If all these moves were motivated by salary dumps then whoever put us in the hole by spearheading the O'Day, Davis, Trumbo, and Cobb signings should be tarred and feathered. Preferably during the 7th inning stretch of a weekend game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My initial impression is that I don't like any of the players we got in either of these trades.  Luis Ortiz was a first round pick a few years ago but he is mediocre in his third try at the Southern League.   Jonathan Villar is filler.  Jean Carmona is young but he is struggling to hit in the Pioneer League. 

Brett Cumberland was a second round pick a couple of years ago but can't hit .250 in the low minors.   Jean Encarnacion has a 13/100 BB/K ratio in the low minors.  Brett Zimmerman is a former fifth round pick; good K/IP and ERA at A/AA but lots of walks.  Evan Phillips looks like a major league ready bullpen guy, so that's fine.

I don't think any of these guys deserve to be in our top 10.  Maybe Ortiz, on stuff/reputation alone, but the results are not there and results matter.  

I was very impressed by what DD was able to bring back for Machado and Britton.  These trades just seem like salary dumps or making moves for the sake of making moves.  If the value wasn't there, they shouldn't have pulled the trigger.  I think we got fleeced, big time.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing to ponder with the Gausman trade, think about all this AA SP we’ve just acquired. There were lots of factors at play. 

Oday’s money for this year and next. AA SP new depth. Slot money to get VVM. Actual money to get VVM. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, LocoChris said:

The  issue isn't necessarily overrating Gausman but the amount of control he had. I think people expected better for a solid pitcher under control for another 2 years.

I think you're right. But it's important to note that those two controllable years wouldn't be terribly cheap and the O's are not planning to compete anyway. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SteveA said:

And Villar is under control through 2021 (a fact which really surprises me, seems like he has been around long enough that he should be closer to free agency).

So he can help stabilize the middle infield behind our pitchers for a few years while we wait for our system to start producing some middle infield talent.

For 1 year + 2 months of Schoop, this looks like a decent deal.

Gausman deal does not look good IMO.

He's an awful fielder though.  Not sure he's the guy we want behind our pitchers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not going to freak out over the Gausman return. There might actually be a star in there for all any of us know. My expectations were not that high to begin with, honestly. I mean, Gaus is a 2 pitch pitcher and I hope he does well for the Braves, but I think despite the talk on here about other teams don't undervalue him as much as we do, we've seen that isn't the case after all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • The insurers did not pay.
    • Yellow is the only one you know for certain ends well. 
    • It's nuts how good we were in 2014 without Machado, Davis and Wieters. We still lose if the McClouth home run is called fair I think it was fine to use Ubaldo there, but Buck should have had a quicker hook It's down to Machado and Keeping Cruz over Davis. I think you have to believe we're World Series champions with Machado in 2014 to make that choice, and I can't say for sure that we would have been. I think I have to go with keeping Cruz over Davis, because it might have prevented the 2016 Ubaldo fiasco since Davis was awful in that game and Cruz might have scored us an extra run. Also, it would have been better for the teams long-term flexibility and could have helped the rebuild since we'd likely have been able to ship Cruz out for some good prospects
    • Boy that's hard. Machado might cause us to win a World Series. Would have liked to have Weiters and Davis that postseason. We definitely would have won then I believe
    • Mejia is essentially Richie Martin.  I do like the idea of picking up Robertson and/or Adeiny Hechavarria. Going into camp with Martin, Valaika, Sanchez, Ruiz, Urias, and one or both of Robertson/Hechavarria should get us through the season.  We also have Stevie Wilkerson back in AAA,  and I suppose Bannon and McCoy are of that age of do or die; so they could get a shot. If the O's can spend 40 million over 4 years on the Korean SS Kim and spread the cash 3, 7, 10, 20 to alleviate the bill while we shed Cobb and Davis (would back loading it be attractive to a FA since Covid my cut into salaries again?).  I think its a good gamble because we are starting to build enough young SS depth in the system, yet it probably won't be truly developed for another 3 to 5 years.  When Kim's contract would be up, we would hopefully have a couple options ready in AAA/AA ready to go. Signing Kim would allow use to take a chance at being competitive in 2022 and 2023 while we wait for the our next star SS to develop for the long haul. If they go big and sign Kim, I would go with Sanchez at 2B and let Valaika, Ruiz, Martin, and Urias battle it out for 3B and a utility role or two.  You could still sign one of Robertson/Hechavarria to come in for that roster battle.  In the end, if you could space out Kim's contract, the next two seasons could still be fairly cost effective.  You are taking the risk on years 3 and 4.  If Kim ends up flopping that 20 million in year 4 would be a bummer, but at least the last few years of Davis and Cobb have softened that potential blow a little bit.  If we strike gold on Kim and our young pitching and position players start blossoming, it could get exciting by next season, which would be 2 years early based on my initial predictions with the rebuild.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...