Jump to content
weams

Orioles Deal Gausman/O'Day to Braves - Schoop to Brewers

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I didn’t say he was going to bring back the farm. Also Brewers had no room for him and money. 

That's their problem. If I was Duquette and they forced Villar down my throat you're damn sure I would have been asking for one of their top prospects. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Moose Milligan said:

So if I understand you correctly you're upset that:

We traded a pitcher we all overvalued and who most likely wasn't going to reach his full potential in Baltimore and a broken, expensive reliever for:

2.5 million in international money

4 prospects

And why is this bad?

I'm never in favor of spending players or draft picks to get out of poor contracts.  Just eat the contract. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I agree with this. I wouldn't have muddied the waters of a Gausman trade with O'Day. It's pretty clear it was the wrong move, especially when you see what the Pirates gave up for Archer. I think most of us would have been ecstatic if Austin Meadows was the headliner of the Gausman trade. 

Gausman isn't Archer.  There's no real comp there.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Or...

Carmona is a fun prospect but a good 4 plus years away - if he makes it.    

Ortiz is fat and probably projects more as a reliever than a starter.

Villar has an OPS+ of 84 this year - following a 71 in 2017.  What happened to him - He looked like a rising star in 2016.  

 

 

It’s baseball. What does fat have to do with it? Lol. He’s a pitcher. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Or...

Carmona is a fun prospect but a good 4 plus years away - if he makes it.    

Ortiz is fat and probably projects more as a reliever than a starter.

Villar has an OPS+ of 84 this year - following a 71 in 2017.  What happened to him - He looked like a rising star in 2016.  

 

 

Fat shaming now are we? I can think of a few hefty pitchers that ended up with pretty awesome careers.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cy Bundy said:

It’s hard to believe the Archer we just saw is that much better than Gausman, but it must be so.

His contract is a lot better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LarryHarlow said:

I think his point, or belief, is that if O'Day hadn't been included, we would have received better prospects in return.  Assuming that is true, it makes sense, and we shouldn't have traded O'Day.

That's not really a "belief."  The Braves took on O'Day's salary as a salary dump.  They didn't do that out of the kindness of their hearts.  
All anybody could possibly argue is the extent to which it diminished the return.  But nobody could, in good faith, argue it didn't diminish the return. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Cy Bundy said:

@Luke-OH has more grading to do. I’m eager to see where these players would place in his top 50.

My prediction is that not a single player coming back to us from Atlanta is able to break the top 20. 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm never in favor of spending players or draft picks to get out of poor contracts.  Just eat the contract. 

I agree. You were consistently against trades like Webb and Matusz. But we could need the money for VVM. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Moose Milligan said:

Gausman isn't Archer.  There's no real comp there.  

 

So Archer landed Meadow AND Glasnow. Both highly touted prospects. You're telling me Gausman isn't good enough to land at least an equivalent of one of those players? 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

The players the Pirates gave up for Archer make me scratch my head even more. I mean, I'm not a minor league savant, but I've certainly heard of Meadows and Glasnow. 

If all these moves were motivated by salary dumps then whoever put us in the hole by spearheading the O'Day, Davis, Trumbo, and Cobb signings should be tarred and feathered. Preferably during the 7th inning stretch of a weekend game. 

Glasnow is a reliever, Meadows shine has come off.

Wasn't great.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ChuckS said:

My prediction is that not a single player coming back to us from Atlanta is able to break the top 20. 

That’s pathetic if so..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, sportsfan8703 said:

I agree. You were consistently against trades like Webb and Matusz. But we could need the money for VVM. 

What if we don't get VVM?  It's not a foregone conclusion that we get him and we already had enough slot money to offer him the best contract. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Reboulet'sStache said:

That's not really a "belief."  The Braves took on O'Day's salary as a salary dump.  They didn't do that out of the kindness of their hearts.  
All anybody could possibly argue is the extent to which it diminished the return.  But nobody could, in good faith, argue it didn't diminish the return. 

I can't imagine if we were offered one of the top 10 pitching prospects then O'Day would have been thrown in

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • It's nuts how good we were in 2014 without Machado, Davis and Wieters. We still lose if the McClouth home run is called fair I think it was fine to use Ubaldo there, but Buck should have had a quicker hook It's down to Machado and Keeping Cruz over Davis. I think you have to believe we're World Series champions with Machado in 2014 to make that choice, and I can't say for sure that we would have been. I think I have to go with keeping Cruz over Davis, because it might have prevented the 2016 Ubaldo fiasco since Davis was awful in that game and Cruz might have scored us an extra run. Also, it would have been better for the teams long-term flexibility and could have helped the rebuild since we'd likely have been able to ship Cruz out for some good prospects
    • Boy that's hard. Machado might cause us to win a World Series. Would have liked to have Weiters and Davis that postseason. We definitely would have won then I believe
    • Mejia is essentially Richie Martin.  I do like the idea of picking up Robertson and/or Adeiny Hechavarria. Going into camp with Martin, Valaika, Sanchez, Ruiz, Urias, and one or both of Robertson/Hechavarria should get us through the season.  We also have Stevie Wilkerson back in AAA,  and I suppose Bannon and McCoy are of that age of do or die; so they could get a shot. If the O's can spend 40 million over 4 years on the Korean SS Kim and spread the cash 3, 7, 10, 20 to alleviate the bill while we shed Cobb and Davis (would back loading it be attractive to a FA since Covid my cut into salaries again?).  I think its a good gamble because we are starting to build enough young SS depth in the system, yet it probably won't be truly developed for another 3 to 5 years.  When Kim's contract would be up, we would hopefully have a couple options ready in AAA/AA ready to go. Signing Kim would allow use to take a chance at being competitive in 2022 and 2023 while we wait for the our next star SS to develop for the long haul. If they go big and sign Kim, I would go with Sanchez at 2B and let Valaika, Ruiz, Martin, and Urias battle it out for 3B and a utility role or two.  You could still sign one of Robertson/Hechavarria to come in for that roster battle.  In the end, if you could space out Kim's contract, the next two seasons could still be fairly cost effective.  You are taking the risk on years 3 and 4.  If Kim ends up flopping that 20 million in year 4 would be a bummer, but at least the last few years of Davis and Cobb have softened that potential blow a little bit.  If we strike gold on Kim and our young pitching and position players start blossoming, it could get exciting by next season, which would be 2 years early based on my initial predictions with the rebuild.
    • I dont know about you all, but watching the stars of my youth playing out their careers while being an embarrassment to the game is absolutely heartbreaking to me.  I like how football does contracts with a portion being guaranteed and a portion, typically the last year or two not guaranteed.  Football contracts are typically much shorter.  I think it’s partially steroid related, but these baseball players seems to hit a cliff in their low 30s now.  Obviously this isn’t true for all players, but these massive contracts seem terrible for the game.     any thoughts on how to make baseball contracts better? The obvious answer would be to not give out foolish contracts, but that always happens as gms are understandably short sighted.  
    • Another gem.   Love hearing these stories of how it was in the old days.     https://blogs.fangraphs.com/a-conversation-with-1960s-slugger-jim-gentile-part-one/ https://blogs.fangraphs.com/a-conversation-with-1960s-slugger-jim-gentile-part-two/
    • Hope you are right.  Elias would probably go that high and Galvis would be a good defensive SS to have as an Oriole.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...