Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Legend_Of_Joey

Favorite call up?

Who is your favorite call up?  

38 members have voted

  1. 1. Multiple choice is allowed.

    • Renato Nunez
      9
    • Paul Fry
      7
    • Austin Wynns
      8
    • Steve Wilkerson
      3
    • Cedric Mullins
      34
    • Ryan Meisinger
      1
    • Yefri Ramierez
      4
    • Chance Sisco
      3
    • David Hess
      1
    • Cody Carroll
      3


Recommended Posts

Well, with the Orioles being officially eliminated from getting the AL East title, let's look back at this season for the good thing...

Getting to see the kids called up!

Who has been your favorite call up(s), who has impressed you, who exceeded your expectations? You don't have to limit it to just 1 player.

I'll put my thoughts into the ones I voted for a bit later today.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mullins is the obvious answer, but I went to school with one of Ryan's parents and it is cool to see him do well, even though I have never met him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Well, with the Orioles being officially eliminated from getting the AL East title, let's look back at this season for the good thing...

Getting to see the kids called up!

Who has been your favorite call up(s), who has impressed you, who exceeded your expectations? You don't have to limit it to just 1 player.

I'll put my thoughts into the ones I voted for a bit later today.

I voted for Mullins. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mullins definitely. 

Even though they aren’t prospects, would love to see Yaz and Rosa before they are DFA-ed at season’s end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nunez is slashing .286/.338/.460/.799 (OPS+ 120) in 18 games with the O's. He's only 24. If he continues to hit and his fielding improves, he could at least hold down 3B until there's a better option. Or, he could be the option.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Nunez is slashing .286/.338/.460/.799 (OPS+ 120) in 18 games with the O's. He's only 24. If he continues to hit and his fielding improves, he could at least hold down 3B until there's a better option. Or, he could be the option.

 

I hadn't realized he was hitting so we'll. Good stuff. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted for Wynns, Fry, Wilkerson, and Mullins.

I think people know why I like Wynns, but he has also done a lot better than I thought he would, as far as hitting. Also, 5 for 11 caught stealing (where it should be atleast 7 for 11 if Nunez and Beckham learn to catch a throw) is pretty good.

Fry has been a favorite since Bowie and I'm glad he got a chance and has done well. He has his ups and downs like a rookie, but he seems to have had the best showing out of the rookie pitchers so far. Also, who doesn't love the "Players Choice" jersey name?

Wilkerson is another favorite, this time since Frederick. His injury came at a bad time (not that there ever is a good time for that), as he could of built on that good game he had. His glove seems to have come as advertised. The bat started to do a bit. Can't wait for him to come back and really get a shot.

Mullins is just awesome. A shy dude who always has a giant smile, it was great seeing him in Bowie and getting to chat with him a bunch. Setting an Orioles record in his debut was awesome. If you only read stories about him or seem clips here and there, you are in for a real treat once he gets a little settled in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mullins has been a treat to watch.  Now let's see how the board acts when he goes through his first 0-20 strech.

That said, he looks good.  The way he turned on that inside fastball for his first hit was awesome.  Real quick bat.

I voted for Mullins because he's obvious, but I kinda like Yefry Ramirez.  I am not sure why.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • Just don't give away tomatoes to the fans. 
    • I use cbd on occasion. It does seem to help me fall asleep, but doesn’t help with waking up wide awake a few hours later. 
    • I voted Mancini but I could have gone with Villar as well. I think Villar's lack of effort occasionally and base paths blunders is what shaded me towards Mancini for MVO. Saying that, if Villar did receive it I would not be upset as he clearly has the best WAR despite being forced to play out of position at SS a lot this year.
    • I think when he team is ready to win again if Davis is not preforming in a helpful manner then he  needs to go.   I don't see the O's being at that point yet.   Maybe in another year.    Players get hurt all the time.  As a bench player Davis can step in for them.   Also there are a lot of unproven players that the league may adjust to and they will may be sent down.  (see Mullins, not for Davis but because he is a example of an unproven player that needed to go down)    Davis may find playing time for those players also.   The 26th man makes it easier to keep Davis on the 26 man roster.
    • I have a lot of disconnected, disorganized thoughts on this subject.  I like Tony's suggestions, or at least the acknowledgment of the idea that there are alternate ways of developing players that might be more efficient or at least more cost-effective. A few points: - I've never thought that the current setup was optimal, but rather formed by a series of events more related to economics than player development.  In the beginning all minor league teams were just like major league teams except in small cities.  Only in the 1920s, and then accelerating in the 30s because of the Depression, did the majors start buying up the minors and turning them into development squads instead of teams trying to draw fans and win their pennant.  For 50+ years MLB teams didn't have any full-time affiliates.  That was probably less successful at wringing out all the talent, but MLB got along just fine.  The majors wanted to own the minors to keeps costs down.  They got tired of having to pay $100k for Lefty Grove after a protracted negotiation with Oriole owner Jack Dunn.  Much easier if they just owned Jack Dunn and all the rest of the Orioles. - I think one reason for the sprawling system we have today is MLB contracts, options, and related issues.  I think most good prospects would do just fine as part-time major league players at 20 or 22.  They spend that time in the minors because nobody wants to burn service time.  We've convinced ourselves that prospects would stall if they were utility infielders or relievers at 18 or 20.  But we don't know that, in fact we know many successful MLB players did just that in the pre-draft era, and some even became MLB stars as teenagers.  If service time wasn't a thing (for example, if everyone became a free agent at 28), I think lots of players would shoot through the minors in record time.  And there would be much less need for eight levels of affiliates. - Japan has one level of minors.  I don't know that this is seen as any kind of impediment to development.  Ichiro was in the NPB as a teenager.  They do have more teenagers in the NBP than we see in the US.  But they also don't get to free agency until something like eight or nine years in, so they don't care as much about service time. - Mexico, Korea, Taiwan, the rest of the world... no minors at all.  At least in any cases I know of.  Of course they top out at the equivalent of A or AA levels, so not quite the same.  But nobody else has the resources to have huge, sprawling development systems.  Maybe not optimal, but the world doesn't end when you regularly have 18-year-olds playing alongside 36-year-olds.
    • Obviously we are all hyper sensitive to any kind of soreness with Harvey. I do think this thing is bothering him still an the team wants to be ultra careful with him. At 75.2 IP, he is at twice the amount of innings that he threw in 2018 so he may be near the limit that they wanted to get him this year as well.  Honestly, I wouldn't be upset if they just came out and said they were going to shut him down this year. I have him penciled in as the closer next year and only an injury would get in the way of him having success in that role.
    • One, it's against board rules to call people including players and coaches idiots, so consider this your warning. Secondly, you do know that Harvey was a starter at the beginning of the year and had 10 games with 40 or more pitches. After converting to a reliever, he had two minor league innings where he threw 33 pitches in an inning and one in an inning and a third. Harvey is almost 25-years old. While I don't think anyone, including Hyde preferred that he stayed out there that long in one inning, I don't think Hyde was reckless or an idiot for doing so. If he's incapable of throwing a 30 pitch inning when things aren't going great, what is he then? I think your dislike for Hyde is clouding your judgement here. While you are certainly entitled to your opinion of not liking Hyde, you are not entitled to call him an idiot while doing so here on the Hangout.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...