Jump to content
atomic

How to make baseball more interesting

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, atomic said:

 

Yeah. It would make a fly ball much more valuable than a strike out. 

 

 

 

22 hours ago, ExileAngelos said:

 

So you can score from 2nd base on a pop-up ???

 

o

 

And in some cases, you could score from 1st base on a pop-up.

In fact, if the bases were loaded with less than 2 outs, you could have a "bases-clearing pop-up" ........ the fictional Willie Mays Hayes might lead the league in RBI's instead of having to do 50 push-ups every time that he hit the ball in the air.

 

A pitcher could lead the league with a 7.12 ERA ........ maybe 6.88 if another of the suggestions (make the ball less lively) were also implemented.

 

o

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/3/2018 at 12:09 PM, ORIOLE33 said:

I would definitely get rid of the shift.

I would definitely get rid of players who are so pull-dependent that the shift is a great strategy to make them hit .168.

The shift is a great incentivizer of employing more guys who slap the ball to the opposite field and run hard.  Outlawing the shift is not only unwieldy and going against nearly 200 years of baseball history, but it also enables our descent into three true outcomes becoming the only outcomes.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"How to make baseball more interesting"

Translation: How to make baseball more like sports I actually enjoy and take the time to learn about.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More bat flips. More emotion. More players visibly having fun. Fewer grouchy, boring, old white dudes in the announcer’s booth. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I would definitely get rid of players who are so pull-dependent that the shift is a great strategy to make them hit .168.

The shift is a great incentivizer of employing more guys who slap the ball to the opposite field and run hard.  Outlawing the shift is not only unwieldy and going against nearly 200 years of baseball history, but it also enables our descent into three true outcomes becoming the only outcomes.

I agree completely. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I would definitely get rid of players who are so pull-dependent that the shift is a great strategy to make them hit .168.

The shift is a great incentivizer of employing more guys who slap the ball to the opposite field and run hard.  Outlawing the shift is not only unwieldy and going against nearly 200 years of baseball history, but it also enables our descent into three true outcomes becoming the only outcomes.

Along similar lines, I think outlawing the shift would be a step towards making baseball more like snookers (that is a game where the outcomes are circumscribed by a strict set of rules and constraints) and less like a game where folks run freely around on some grass ( or pseudo grass) and compete athletically against each other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chavez Ravine said:

Along similar lines, I think outlawing the shift would be a step towards making baseball more like snookers (that is a game where the outcomes are circumscribed by a strict set of rules and constraints) and less like a game where folks run freely around on some grass ( or pseudo grass) and compete athletically against each other.

If they outlaw the shift I will be done with the game.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

A team of 9 Ichiros would be more fun to watch than 9 Judges.

Four of the Ichiros would  use Judge's approach. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, VaBird1 said:

I think splitting all of the tv revenue equally would make the game more interesting.

Yeah, look at the NFL, it created parity. Is that what you really want for baseball?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I completely get the argument against change from the traditionalists, but they absolutely need to find a way to speed up the game if they want to attract a younger fan base. And if they don't, it's probably going to go they way of hockey and become more of a niche sport. I'm not sure I agree with all of the suggestions made by the original poster, but pitching changes take up a ridiculous amount of unnecessary time and they completely kill the pace of the game. Limiting the number of pitchers allowed on rosters and making them face more than one batter seems like it would help. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • MLB teams are not allowed to announce positive tests of players for legal (HIPAA) reasons. They do announce when they put guys on the Covid disabled list, as the Phillies did yesterday with 4 guys including Tommy Hunter.  Technically that is not proof the guys tested positive because you can go on the C-19 list if you are positive, if you have symptoms and are awaiting testing/test results, or if you have been exposed to someone who has it. You could also find out if a player has it if he announces it himself on social media or whatever. But the team can't come out and say it.
    • I’m pretty sure they are family members as well.
    • “The reality is we weren’t going to play more than 60 games, no matter how the negotiation with the players went, or any other factor,"  That comment trumps the other comments. He’s saying that “regardless of the negotiations” Well then, why have negotiations? Why not say, “we’re only gonna have 60 games and we’re going to start in July” Why waste so much time on posturing that, according to Manfred himself, was useless?  That’s why I asked the lawyers in the crowd For their thoughts. Spirit of 66 is not a lawyer, but his comment was very cogent
    • Yes... probably mostly bad in Florida. Plus they tend to want pimento and other stuff in the south. I was in Georgia for a while and a pretty high profile place with several locations called Ray’s had a pretty good quality cake, but it had chopped pepper in it and served it with a garlic aioli. They had Old Bay in the kitchen so you could request it. But I don’t believe it was in their recipe. If you ever get through Atlanta look them up!
    • Boarman's Market in Highland often has some good ones in their butcher/seafood section.  Great place, this old fashioned farmers market / grocer with hand painted signs in an area of HoCo that was once all farms but is now full of neighborhoods with million dollar houses.  But Boarman's hasn't changed. I'll swing by there on a Friday onmy way to Blacksburg for a football weekend and pick up a pound of their fresh made daily breakfast sausage for us to have at our tailgate the next day.  Got a dozen crabcakes there once and we grilled them at our tailgate the next day and they were fantastic.
    • Timbuktu’s are good but they prices have skyrocketed.  The the Olive Grove which is right up the street from G&M.   They are comparable to G&M in size and lump meat but have a little more zing to them.
    • I ordered crab cakes in Columbus Ohio once and I can’t recommend any more highly to never do that. They were about the size of a quarter and we’re pretty inedible. I had some good crab cakes at Jordan Pond House in Acadia National Park in Maine a few times.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...