Jump to content
Babkins

Britton on the use of analytics in New York vs. Baltimore

Recommended Posts

You guys are missing a name here, Sarah Gelles. Gelles has been in charge of analytics under Duquette since December 2011 when she was promoted from a baseball operations intern.

I don't know her at all, but everything I've ever heard about her by other people in the organization has been negative . Whoever they hire to be the VP of Baseball Operations needs to clean house and bring in actual successful Analytics people. It's embarrassing to hear how much better other organizations are with data and analytics.

Actually Gelles is one of Duquette's failures as GM.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

You guys are missing a name here, Sarah Gelles. Gelles has been in charge of analytics under Duquette since December 2011 when she was promoted from a baseball operations intern.

I don't know her at all, but everything I've ever heard about her by other people in the organization has been negative . Whoever they hire to be the VP of Baseball Operations needs to clean house and bring in actual successful Analytics people. It's embarrassing to hear how much better other organizations are with data and analytics.

Actually Gelles is one of Duquette's failures as GM.

Interesting.

Did you see this bit, 2 months ago?

Quote

I think their recent hiring of COO of business Operations John Vidalin, who has worked in every major sport, shows the team is going to work to be innovative as far as using technology, analytics, and getting fans in seats. Vidalin comes from the Miami Heat, who deeply use analytics and also make games an event people want to attend, whether they are sports fans or not.

https://thebaltimorewire.com/2018/07/19/baltimore-orioles-dan-duquette-future/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Satyr3206 said:

Anyone can have all the data they can handle. Still have to execute.

Zach did quite well a few years ago. Certainly, the O's can "beef" up the analytics but the talent has to be there. Putting Jones in CF with that lack of range the last several years was a joke. That is the sort of thing that did Buck in. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, pastorfan said:

Zach did quite well a few years ago. Certainly, the O's can "beef" up the analytics but the talent has to be there. Putting Jones in CF with that lack of range the last several years was a joke. That is the sort of thing that did Buck in. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I assume this is standard for the Orioles: they've improved quite a bit over the past decade, but the other teams have improved more quickly.  The 2003 Orioles were a state of the art franchise for 1985.  Maybe now they're only a few years behind.

Exactly.   It's not some binary "this team uses analytics" / "this team doesn't".

You can use analytics as a team for player evaluation for potential acquisitions and other player decisions.

You can use analytics to determine where to position fielders and other in game tactical decisions.

And you can do what the Yankees do and provide each player with information that is tailored to specifically help them, as Britton describes.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Exactly.   It's not some binary "this team uses analytics" / "this team doesn't".

You can use analytics as a team for player evaluation for potential acquisitions and other player decisions.

You can use analytics to determine where to position fielders and other in game tactical decisions.

And you can do what the Yankees do and provide each player with information that is tailored to specifically help them, as Britton describes.

I think the appropriate statement on the Orioles is that they don't use them correctly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

You guys are missing a name here, Sarah Gelles. Gelles has been in charge of analytics under Duquette since December 2011 when she was promoted from a baseball operations intern.

I don't know her at all, but everything I've ever heard about her by other people in the organization has been negative . Whoever they hire to be the VP of Baseball Operations needs to clean house and bring in actual successful Analytics people. It's embarrassing to hear how much better other organizations are with data and analytics.

Actually Gelles is one of Duquette's failures as GM.

This is interesting information.    All I know about Gelles is she went to Amherst, like Duquette.   I’d be interested to know what kind of specific negative things you’ve heard about her.    I could see the old school guys saying negative things just because they don’t like the newfangled analytics.  Or, I could see people who know what they’re talking about saying she’s not as good as her peers in the industry.    In any event I think we are under-resourced in this area.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

More is not always better, but it’s clear the Yankees have dropped some serious coin on their analytics squad. We asked around, and it seems that nobody beats them when it comes to the size of their research and development departments.

Team Analysts Team Analysts
American League   National League  
Yankees 20 Dodgers 20
Astros 15 Braves 15
Rays 15 Brewers 11
Angels 10 Reds 11
Tigers 9 Phillies 10
Rangers 8 Nationals 8
Mariners 7 Pirates 8
Royals 7 Padres 7
Twins 7 Cardinals 6
Blue Jays 6 Cubs 6
Red Sox 6 Giants 6
Indians 5 Marlins 6
Orioles 5 Dbacks 5
Athletics 3 Rockies 4
White Sox 2 Mets 3

https://theathletic.com/560514/2018/10/03/how-brian-cashman-deftly-played-the-long-game-and-used-analytics-to-transform-the-culture-of-the-yankees/
 

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting that the A's one of the pioneers using analytics only has 3 on staff.  Analytics, scouting and minor league development staff are three areas that are often underfunded and are 3 key areas every team especially small to medium market teams need to exploit.  How much does an analyst cost?  A scout, minor league coach?  You can probably hire an excellent coach or scout for $100K, a very good analytics department might cost $7 or $8 mil.  The O's cut corners here to basically save the salaries of Chris Tilman and Rasmus who you did not need any analytics or scouts to tell you were bad signings.  

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Chromehill said:

Interesting that the A's one of the pioneers using analytics only has 3 on staff.  Analytics, scouting and minor league development staff are three areas that are often underfunded and are 3 key areas every team especially small to medium market teams need to exploit.  How much does an analyst cost?  A scout, minor league coach?  You can probably hire an excellent coach or scout for $100K, a very good analytics department might cost $7 or $8 mil.  The O's cut corners here to basically save the salaries of Chris Tilman and Rasmus who you did not need any analytics or scouts to tell you were bad signings.  

Billy has the players doing spread sheets off the clock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SteveA said:

Exactly.   It's not some binary "this team uses analytics" / "this team doesn't".

You can use analytics as a team for player evaluation for potential acquisitions and other player decisions.

You can use analytics to determine where to position fielders and other in game tactical decisions.

And you can do what the Yankees do and provide each player with information that is tailored to specifically help them, as Britton describes.

Zach basically throws one pitch. How much analysis is there for this type of reliever? Everybody wants better information but I've heard Max Scherzer praise Matt Wieters for providing this very same service.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, LookitsPuck said:

Also, I don't think people realize how much of a drop in the bucket a true analytics department would cost. But it comes from the top. And by the top...I don't mean the owner. I mean the GM. 

Look at what Huntington did. He got Clint f'ing Hurdle to buy into it. He had a rag tag group of people that was integrated every day on the field, with the players, strategizing with Hurdle, etc.

About one Colby Rasmus per year. Or one 2018 Tillman. The Orioles have flushed that kind of money down the toilet multiple times per year most years of the Angelos reign. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/17/2018 at 6:41 PM, bobmc said:

Good interviews with Diaz, Tate, Hays plus Kline, Akin, McKenna and Bannon.  At 34 minutes she gets to Bannon and I thought it interesting that when she asked him to compare the Dodger and Oriole organizations.  He said the Dodgers were more innovative and the Orioles were "old-school".  He dances around that and says he likes both concepts and even seemed to prefer the "Oriole Way".  But he said that the Dodgers use analytics more.  See what you think.  Sara does a good job of getting honest answers.  A good group of young men - I picked up a few insights.

 

This made me recall this thread from bobmc on the minors board a couple months ago. Rylan Bannon talked about how the Orioles organization was more "old school" and less analytically inclined than the Dodgers. I think he figured out midway through talking about it that he probably shouldn't be talking about it at length and sort of demurred. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • I don’t know him, but especially with 2080baseball not doing a Rule 5 preview this year, his is the only comparable Rule 5 Draft preview in the public domain. He’s been doing it for a lot longer than me and he has sources, so it’s a solid measuring stick for my work on the subject.
    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/anthony-rendon-agrees-to-sevenyear-245-million-deal-with-angels-034047632.html This is a nuts offseason isn't it. My analysis: I'm going to start with his Steamer 2020 predictions, which are 5.5 WAR.  I figure he's good for: 2020: 5.5 2021: 5.5 2022: 5 2023: 4.5 2024: 4 2025: 3.5 2026: 2.5 That's an estimated 30.5 WAR.  Assuming FA rates are at around 8mm/WAR, that's an expected return of about 244m.  Not too bad. cost per WAR has stayed stagnant/regressed slightly in the past couple years, so there's no guarantee that the future will see more expensive prices.  This seems like fair market value for a good player that's been moderately durable for his career.  Hopefully he doesn't fall off a cliff like Pujols did.
    • Is he a friend of yours? Or a fan of yours? :-) 
    • There are lots of relief fits, just depends on how they have those players evaluated. I’m sure those boards vary drastically between teams.
    • Well they’ve hinted that they are looking at starting pitching.  Fuentes, Sharp, and Rijo don’t really fit the profile of pitchers the Orioles have targeted under Elias. That doesn’t mean they won’t take them, but I think it’s less likely. Newsome checks a few boxes from a pure statistical standpoint. It’s hard to pinpoint who they’d target to start, I doubt they have evaluated Bailey as a starter.  Maybe they want to get Brown to drop his 2S. Or aren’t afraid to grab a starter without much AA time in Ian McKinney. Misiewicz would be another option if they want to go safer. Buddy Reed fits the need for a pure CF guy to give depth behind Hays.  Fermin makes sense in terms of adding quality to the middle infielder org depth. Yonny Hernandez too but I doubt people are as high on him, I think he’s just a personal favorite.  I know with Orioles prospects the philosophy is you have to graduate each level in the minors. If they stick to that, it limits things to Tom, Rojas, Megill, Clay (I’m assuming there is no fit for Nogowski) and a few others. That’s the best chance for 2020 value, but limits the potential for long term value.
    • Revenues are up, but the % of MLB players getting that is shriking and in-equality in pay is raising between players. The system is broken, younger players are way under-paid. Which gives teams a silly amount of surplus value to use. They have to invest it somewhere to make it matter. That is why you see bonkers FA deals for top talents. This broken system is why re-building is much more en-vouge then it was before. Its so freaking profitable to stack up on guys who are talented and give you 3 years of pre-arb. Then 3 more years of escalating 1 year salaries based on merit. The way to stop is a re-model of the arb system and let the youth that are actually winning the games get more $$$
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...