Jump to content
Tony-OH

TT: Silence of Ownership is Deafening

Recommended Posts

I am really curious as to whether the Orioles ran an operating profit in 2018 after a 47-115 record?  If so, maybe that's why the brothers feel no urgency to communicate with their customers (fanbase).  I would think that being in the red would light a fire under their a$$, as it would any other business owner, baseball or otherwise. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

But T, were the Mets coming off a historically awful season? Again, this is not just this last month we are talking about. We're talking an entire debacle of a season and they said nothing. They let Duquette runs the trades and talk about the future and then fire him? They allow Buck to stay as manager even though his overall record as manager here was being tarnished? The Orioles lost and lost and lost and the said nothing to anyone. Then all they do is drop a press release when Duquette and Buck are fired? 

Sorry, that's a consistent history or them not communicating with their fans and they have shown to be no different than their father in this regard.

Letting Duquette spout off the Orioles future plans and then firing him two months later is another reason why the Angelos brothers should have to reveal themselves to the public.

They could be doing the right things behind the scenes, but the image they are projecting is it’s the same old Orioles.  Optics matter to the average fan. Maybe drawing only a 1 million fans will wake up the brothers.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, stockpile said:

I am really curious as to whether the Orioles ran an operating profit in 2018 after a 47-115 record?  If so, maybe that's why the brothers feel no urgency to communicate with their customers (fanbase).  I would think that being in the red would light a fire under their a$$, as it would any other business owner, baseball or otherwise. 

MASN $$$$

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

This is big part of what people are missing here. There are always going to be fans that think the Orioles can do no wrong and there is some extraordinary puppet master in control and we just don't know about him. That behind the scenes all is well and the fact that ownership has not had press conference in gheese, I don't know when, is par for the course because that's what they've been groomed for under the Angelos regime.

Good owners/CEOs communicate to their fans/customers. They don't make major changes and then put out very generic press release and then go back into hiding while major changes need to happen. Tell me one successful business that fires their leadership team then goes in secrecy for a month?

The Angelos brothers are communicating with the fans exactly how their father did. Peter Angelos just never cared enough about the fans to worry about communicating with them. It appears by their actions over the last year, the Angelos brothers intend to operate in the same way and that's disappointing.

I wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt that they could be different, but their silence this entire year during this debacle tells me either they don't have control, or they are apples that did fall far from the tree. 

Let's face it, the Orioles 47-115 record is embarrassing. Strong leaders would have called a press conferences, announced the firing of Duquette and Buck, and then told their fans their were in the middle of exhaustive approach to find the best baseball operations people to bring this team back to winning ways. 

They do that, and we all feel better that things are in motion. Maybe some people don't believe they need to do that, but that's short sighted in my opinion and not the way to run a professional sports franchise.

I feel they need to communicate, but not in the middle of a search for the VP & GM.

If they don't speak at the press conference announcing the hiring, THEN I will be upset.   Being upset that we aren't hearing from them now just seems silly.   They came out within 3 days of the end of the season, issued a statement that major changes at the top of the organization, the 3 most powerful spots, were coming and that it would be someone hired from outside the organization and that person would be given complete control.   Now I say let them make those hires, and THEN we need to hear from them.   

And you know what, if they speak at the press conference but keep it short and simple and say this is our new VP of baseball operations, Mr. X.   He knows more about baseball than we do, so we are giving him complete control, and then they step back and let him give a statement about how he wants to rebuild the organization and his vision, I'll be fine with that too.   All I want is a clear organizational structure with a smart baseball person at the top.   Can they make that happen?   I don't know.   But they have at least stated they are trying and while the hiring process is ongoing, that's enough for me.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm curious why Duquette released that statement and then acquiring all those international funds...and then wasn't brought back after most (not me) thought he'd be back.

I do go back and wonder what was done between July 18th (Dan Duquette's midseason statement) and October 3rd (Orioles announcement that Duquette won't return). That's a 3 month period. A lot could have changed then. What truly happened? I think he handled the Adam Jones situation incredibly poorly. Both from a personnel and a PR perspective. But also I'm curious about its impact from a trade perspective. The Zoellner acquisition was (and still is) one of the most idiotic acquisitions. It essentially further nullified the dismal return from the Gausman trade. And perhaps had an impact on the Mesa negotiations. But my real thing is it a combination of things? 3 months and you have an incredibly poor handling of Adam Jones, the Zoellner debacle (potentially something "owed" to the Phillies for overpromising something) and then anything else...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Letting Duquette spout off the Orioles future plans and then firing him two months later is another reason why the Angelos brothers should have to reveal themselves to the public.

They could be doing the right things behind the scenes, but the image they are projecting is it’s the same old Orioles.  Optics matter to the average fan. Maybe drawing only a 1 million fans will wake up the brothers.  

The "average" fan isn't even thinking about the Orioles now.   It's a small percentage of us fanatics that are breathlessly awaiting a new VP of baseball operations and GM.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

This is big part of what people are missing here. There are always going to be fans that think the Orioles can do no wrong and there is some extraordinary puppet master in control and we just don't know about him. That behind the scenes all is well and the fact that ownership has not had press conference in gheese, I don't know when, is par for the course because that's what they've been groomed for under the Angelos regime.

Good owners/CEOs communicate to their fans/customers. They don't make major changes and then put out very generic press release and then go back into hiding while major changes need to happen. Tell me one successful business that fires their leadership team then goes in secrecy for a month?

The Angelos brothers are communicating with the fans exactly how their father did. Peter Angelos just never cared enough about the fans to worry about communicating with them. It appears by their actions over the last year, the Angelos brothers intend to operate in the same way and that's disappointing.

I wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt that they could be different, but their silence this entire year during this debacle tells me either they don't have control, or they are apples that did fall far from the tree. 

Let's face it, the Orioles 47-115 record is embarrassing. Strong leaders would have called a press conferences, announced the firing of Duquette and Buck, and then told their fans their were in the middle of exhaustive approach to find the best baseball operations people to bring this team back to winning ways. 

They do that, and we all feel better that things are in motion. Maybe some people don't believe they need to do that, but that's short sighted in my opinion and not the way to run a professional sports franchise.

You make a lot of good points.   And under normal circumstances more communication with the fan base would show good leadership on the part of the owners.    However this is a different time for the O's.  They are different from any other team this off season because of three events.    

1) An  ownership change appears inevitable.   Even if it is only from father to sons. It has to be approved by the MLB owners.

2) The MASN dispute probably needs to be solved or least seem to be on the way to a solution for the commissioner's office to support that ownership change.

3) There has been a press release from he Orioles that says that the O's will bring in an executive from outside the organization.   Roch has said the this is a President of Baseball Operations.  But we don't know that to be true.  It could be a President or some other title who is in charge on all O's operations.

With this backdrop what things may be taking place?

The Angelos sons may be following MLB rules more strictly then other teams just to be in lock step with the Commissioner's office.  Thus they may not make announcements until after the World Series as the commissioner office would want.

One of the candidate for President of the O's may be from the MLB offices.  (And I don't mean Ng).   The Commissioner's office may not want the name disclosed at this point.  

There may be other valid reasons why the O's keeping quiet that I am not aware of.

I could be completely wrong and this could just to be the mode of operation for the Angelos sons.   But we don't know.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I feel they need to communicate, but not in the middle of a search for the VP & GM.

If they don't speak at the press conference announcing the hiring, THEN I will be upset.   Being upset that we aren't hearing from them now just seems silly.   They came out within 3 days of the end of the season, issued a statement that major changes at the top of the organization, the 3 most powerful spots, were coming and that it would be someone hired from outside the organization and that person would be given complete control.   Now I say let them make those hires, and THEN we need to hear from them.   

And you know what, if they speak at the press conference but keep it short and simple and say this is our new VP of baseball operations, Mr. X.   He knows more about baseball than we do, so we are giving him complete control, and then they step back and let him give a statement about how he wants to rebuild the organization and his vision, I'll be fine with that too.   All I want is a clear organizational structure with a smart baseball person at the top.   Can they make that happen?   I don't know.   But they have at least stated they are trying and while the hiring process is ongoing, that's enough for me.

This. 100%. 

The last game of the season was on 9/30. 3 days later (on a Wednesday), they announced the following:

  • Dan Duquette will not return
  • Buck Showalter will not return
  • They'll hire a new top baseball executive from outside the organization
  • The new executive will have a final say in picking the next manager
  • They potentially will hire an additional executive
  • They assigned an interim baseball operations guy in Brian Graham
  • They announced that Gary Rajsich and Brady Anderson will remain under contract
  • They gave a statement on Buck's and Dan's contributions

That seems plenty to me. It's been 24 days.

Hiring people that are going to change the entire shape of an organization takes an absurd amount of time. It wouldn't shock me if this takes *months*. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

They do have a plan to fix the franchise. The fact that everybody in this thread *knows* that they're hiring executives *outside of the organization* should speak volumes. What more do you want them to do? That's my problem here. 

I don't think the majority of posters are clamoring for detailed info but we are not content that they intend to hire outside the org. What if all they do is hire retreads like Syd Thrift or Valentine or Colletti? What if their hires are just as  resistant to analytics or only favor international signings from the bottom of the barrel? That would pay lip service to your statement but doom the franchise. I fear John is in charge and he will operate just like PA, won't hire people who will challenge him, and that John's inner circle will consist of Brady and Stockstill. If so, IMO we are doomed. What I want to hear is that they have identified a pool of candidates, are conducting interviews offsite, intend to have the new team in place by mid-November to allow them to get familiar with the system before Winter meetings. That they intend to build the minor league system, renew the Oriole Way, and impose it consistently across the system. No specific details just a broad framework to ensure we will improve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, AnythingO's said:

I don't think the majority of posters are clamoring for detailed info but we are not content that they intend to hire outside the org. What if all they do is hire retreads like Syd Thrift or Valentine or Colletti? What if their hires are just as  resistant to analytics or only favor international signings from the bottom of the barrel? That would pay lip service to your statement but doom the franchise. I fear John is in charge and he will operate just like PA, won't hire people who will challenge him, and that John's inner circle will consist of Brady and Stockstill. If so, IMO we are doomed. What I want to hear is that they have identified a pool of candidates, are conducting interviews offsite, intend to have the new team in place by mid-November to allow them to get familiar with the system before Winter meetings. That they intend to build the minor league system, renew the Oriole Way, and impose it consistently across the system. No specific details just a broad framework to ensure we will improve.

I'll complain about that when it happens.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

What I want to hear is that they have identified a pool of candidates, are conducting interviews offsite, intend to have the new team in place by mid-November to allow them to get familiar with the system before Winter meetings. That they intend to build the minor league system, renew the Oriole Way, and impose it consistently across the system. No specific details just a broad framework to ensure we will improve.

Would not this type of statement be coming from the new Executive In Charge Of Baseball Operations??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

I don't think the majority of posters are clamoring for detailed info but we are not content that they intend to hire outside the org. What if all they do is hire retreads like Syd Thrift or Valentine or Colletti? What if their hires are just as  resistant to analytics or only favor international signings from the bottom of the barrel? That would pay lip service to your statement but doom the franchise. I fear John is in charge and he will operate just like PA, won't hire people who will challenge him, and that John's inner circle will consist of Brady and Stockstill. If so, IMO we are doomed. What I want to hear is that they have identified a pool of candidates, are conducting interviews offsite, intend to have the new team in place by mid-November to allow them to get familiar with the system before Winter meetings. That they intend to build the minor league system, renew the Oriole Way, and impose it consistently across the system. No specific details just a broad framework to ensure we will improve.

So what do you want right now to reassure you from them?   A statement that we are going to try to hire someone GOOD from outside, not just someone who sucks?   That would make you feel better?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, thezeroes said:

Would not this type of statement be coming from the new Executive In Charge Of Baseball Operations??

Or perhaps whomever decided to "fire or release or not renew" Dan and Buck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

We're also not talking about just during the Series, stop being dense.

Tony, you have a habit of being very rude to posters here who you disagree with. It isn't a good look and singlehandedly keeps me from being a plus member. Not trying to attack you, just thought I'd share.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SteveA said:

So what do you want right now to reassure you from them?   A statement that we are going to try to hire someone GOOD from outside, not just someone who sucks?   That would make you feel better?

See the last part of my post. No specifics just a plan. Get new people i place before Winter meetings, people that will focus on international market, consistency across the minors, people that value analytics. That the team will be spending more on building the minors and player development.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • Just don't give away tomatoes to the fans. 
    • I use cbd on occasion. It does seem to help me fall asleep, but doesn’t help with waking up wide awake a few hours later. 
    • I voted Mancini but I could have gone with Villar as well. I think Villar's lack of effort occasionally and base paths blunders is what shaded me towards Mancini for MVO. Saying that, if Villar did receive it I would not be upset as he clearly has the best WAR despite being forced to play out of position at SS a lot this year.
    • I think when he team is ready to win again if Davis is not preforming in a helpful manner then he  needs to go.   I don't see the O's being at that point yet.   Maybe in another year.    Players get hurt all the time.  As a bench player Davis can step in for them.   Also there are a lot of unproven players that the league may adjust to and they will may be sent down.  (see Mullins, not for Davis but because he is a example of an unproven player that needed to go down)    Davis may find playing time for those players also.   The 26th man makes it easier to keep Davis on the 26 man roster.
    • I have a lot of disconnected, disorganized thoughts on this subject.  I like Tony's suggestions, or at least the acknowledgment of the idea that there are alternate ways of developing players that might be more efficient or at least more cost-effective. A few points: - I've never thought that the current setup was optimal, but rather formed by a series of events more related to economics than player development.  In the beginning all minor league teams were just like major league teams except in small cities.  Only in the 1920s, and then accelerating in the 30s because of the Depression, did the majors start buying up the minors and turning them into development squads instead of teams trying to draw fans and win their pennant.  For 50+ years MLB teams didn't have any full-time affiliates.  That was probably less successful at wringing out all the talent, but MLB got along just fine.  The majors wanted to own the minors to keeps costs down.  They got tired of having to pay $100k for Lefty Grove after a protracted negotiation with Oriole owner Jack Dunn.  Much easier if they just owned Jack Dunn and all the rest of the Orioles. - I think one reason for the sprawling system we have today is MLB contracts, options, and related issues.  I think most good prospects would do just fine as part-time major league players at 20 or 22.  They spend that time in the minors because nobody wants to burn service time.  We've convinced ourselves that prospects would stall if they were utility infielders or relievers at 18 or 20.  But we don't know that, in fact we know many successful MLB players did just that in the pre-draft era, and some even became MLB stars as teenagers.  If service time wasn't a thing (for example, if everyone became a free agent at 28), I think lots of players would shoot through the minors in record time.  And there would be much less need for eight levels of affiliates. - Japan has one level of minors.  I don't know that this is seen as any kind of impediment to development.  Ichiro was in the NPB as a teenager.  They do have more teenagers in the NBP than we see in the US.  But they also don't get to free agency until something like eight or nine years in, so they don't care as much about service time. - Mexico, Korea, Taiwan, the rest of the world... no minors at all.  At least in any cases I know of.  Of course they top out at the equivalent of A or AA levels, so not quite the same.  But nobody else has the resources to have huge, sprawling development systems.  Maybe not optimal, but the world doesn't end when you regularly have 18-year-olds playing alongside 36-year-olds.
    • Obviously we are all hyper sensitive to any kind of soreness with Harvey. I do think this thing is bothering him still an the team wants to be ultra careful with him. At 75.2 IP, he is at twice the amount of innings that he threw in 2018 so he may be near the limit that they wanted to get him this year as well.  Honestly, I wouldn't be upset if they just came out and said they were going to shut him down this year. I have him penciled in as the closer next year and only an injury would get in the way of him having success in that role.
    • One, it's against board rules to call people including players and coaches idiots, so consider this your warning. Secondly, you do know that Harvey was a starter at the beginning of the year and had 10 games with 40 or more pitches. After converting to a reliever, he had two minor league innings where he threw 33 pitches in an inning and one in an inning and a third. Harvey is almost 25-years old. While I don't think anyone, including Hyde preferred that he stayed out there that long in one inning, I don't think Hyde was reckless or an idiot for doing so. If he's incapable of throwing a 30 pitch inning when things aren't going great, what is he then? I think your dislike for Hyde is clouding your judgement here. While you are certainly entitled to your opinion of not liking Hyde, you are not entitled to call him an idiot while doing so here on the Hangout.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...