Jump to content
FanSince88

How long does your blank check for Elias last?

Recommended Posts

On 11/18/2018 at 7:23 AM, Frobby said:

I don’t think he really gets a blank check at all.    I want to see signs of progress in year one, in terms of filling key positions and seeing some changes in the way things are run.    And I expect that to continue throughout.    But in terms of seeing a winning team on the field, I don’t expect it until year four at the earliest.    I do believe that improvement in the record is likely this year, even if it’s only to 55 games or so, but that’s not how I’ll judge this season.    

I’d love to see some signs that analytics are being used to help existing players and that some of them are responding.    Not necessarily all of them.   This applies in the majors and the minors.

I’d love to see us hiring aggressively in Latin America and making at least a few early signings on July 2.    

And I’d like to see signs that the organization is on the same page, that people are buying in.    And I’d like to see some regular communication to the fans of what the plan is and how it’s being achieved.

I’ve been thinking about this some more.    There are bits and pieces of data that come in here and there now, but I think the first time I’ll be taking a really hard look at what Elias has accomplished is at the end of the 2020 season.    By then, he will have had more than ample time to evaluate the players in our system, he will have had two drafts and we’ll have had a full season of data on his first draft class, he’ll have had two July 2 signing periods, he’ll have had one “regular” offseason in which to make hires,  he’ll have had a good bit of time to implement development systems he wants, and he’ll have had an offseason in which he had more payroll flexibility with the looming departures of Trumbo and Cashner.   So, while I definitely don’t expect to see a winning team in 2020, or anything remotely close to it, I think there will be a lot of other measures on which to judge how Elias is doing, as compared to now.    

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/18/2018 at 7:23 AM, Frobby said:

I don’t think he really gets a blank check at all.    I want to see signs of progress in year one, in terms of filling key positions and seeing some changes in the way things are run.    And I expect that to continue throughout.    But in terms of seeing a winning team on the field, I don’t expect it until year four at the earliest.    I do believe that improvement in the record is likely this year, even if it’s only to 55 games or so, but that’s not how I’ll judge this season.    

I’d love to see some signs that analytics are being used to help existing players and that some of them are responding.    Not necessarily all of them.   This applies in the majors and the minors.

I’d love to see us hiring aggressively in Latin America and making at least a few early signings on July 2.    

And I’d like to see signs that the organization is on the same page, that people are buying in.    And I’d like to see some regular communication to the fans of what the plan is and how it’s being achieved.

I’m violating Tony’s “don’t bump old threads” rule because it’s interesting to go back and see how patient our posters said they would be in 2018 when Elias took the job.   My sense is that many of the natives are beginning to get restless.    

Right now Elias is just about on pace with where I thought he’d be by now, though the short major league season and non-existent minor league season last year makes things a little harder to judge.    

I do think that Elias will need to switch gears after this season.   I’m not expecting a contender in 2022 but I do think the team will need to show very significant improvement to indicate that the rebuild has traction.    Of course, I’m hoping to see improvement this year, but my guess is our winning percentage will be stagnant from last year, maybe even slightly down (we were on a 67.5 win pace, but fading badly in the last 25-30 games).    

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked to see my previous thoughts, but I didn't post in this thread.

To me, he has no time limit. He's 100% capable of doing everything that needs to be done. He will operate under the constraints placed upon him by ownership.

I genuinely believe he'll put us in the best position possible under those constraints because he seems to draft and develop well and he's developed the international market. Time will tell how those feathers in his cap mature into the organization, but even if he never signs a good free agent, it looks like he can build a sustainably good franchise.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I’m violating Tony’s “don’t bump old threads” rule because it’s interesting to go back and see how patient our posters said they would be in 2018 when Elias took the job.   My sense is that many of the natives are beginning to get restless.    

Right now Elias is just about on pace with where I thought he’d be by now, though the short major league season and non-existent minor league season last year makes things a little harder to judge.    

I do think that Elias will need to switch gears after this season.   I’m not expecting a contender in 2022 but I do think the team will need to show very significant improvement to indicate that the rebuild has traction.    Of course, I’m hoping to see improvement this year, but my guess is our winning percentage will be stagnant from last year, maybe even slightly down (we were on a 67.5 win pace, but fading badly in the last 25-30 games).    

I think most of the restlessness is due to some of the often unprecedented signs of extreme penny pinching.  Whether that comes from ownership or Elias, it certainly begs the question if whether they will spend when it is appropriate for a contender.   (As far as I can tell the ONLY encouraging sign spending wise is that they are setting new team highs in the international market).

But rumors that uniform coach decisions are being made for cost cutting reasons, furloughs, asking arbitration players to take deferred money - all are concerning.  Obviously the pandemic is part of it but we don't hear about the other 29 teams doing some of these things other than the furloughs.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm more concerned about Elias wanting to walk out of the door so he can be the next Friedman than I am of kicking him out the door myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I think most of the restlessness is due to some of the often unprecedented signs of extreme penny pinching.  Whether that comes from ownership or Elias, it certainly begs the question if whether they will spend when it is appropriate for a contender.   (As far as I can tell the ONLY encouraging sign spending wise is that they are setting new team highs in the international market).

But rumors that uniform coach decisions are being made for cost cutting reasons, furloughs, asking arbitration players to take deferred money - all are concerning.  Obviously the pandemic is part of it but we don't hear about the other 29 teams doing some of these things other than the furloughs.

 

Which is a much more important use of dollars for the team RIGHT NOW than any stop gap free agent would be

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

Which is a much more important use of dollars for the team RIGHT NOW than any stop gap free agent would be

Obviously.  Didn't talk about stopgap free agents at all in my post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Obviously.  Didn't talk about stopgap free agents at all in my post.

Didn't say you did. Just pointing out that if it's the "ONLY encouraging sign spending wise," it's also the only place we should really be yearning to see an increase in spending at this point in the process. When this started (between 2018 and 2019), we knew it was going to be a long-term tear-down and rebuild. They've spent on infrastructure and international amateurs, which is exactly what the Elias roadmap said before the 2019 season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LookinUp said:

I'm more concerned about Elias wanting to walk out of the door so he can be the next Friedman than I am of kicking him out the door myself.

Judging by what we have seen so far why would a team be eager to promote him?

So far he's upped the technology, slashed payroll and collected high draft picks. 

I haven't seen anything so far that makes me think I have to have this guy as my team president.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/17/2018 at 7:26 PM, Moose Milligan said:

Two years.  

A lot of us said things back in 2018, not knowing a global pandemic would throw a monkey wrench into things.

Overall, I'm happy with what he's done.  The system is better than it was when he took over.  There's a focus on getting good international talent in the system.  There's a focus on advanced metrics and analytics.  

The product at the ML level still sucks but at least there's some hope on the horizon.  I'm fine with what he's done so far and I think it'll pay off in the coming years.  

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, LookinUp said:

I'm more concerned about Elias wanting to walk out of the door so he can be the next Friedman than I am of kicking him out the door myself.

Bingo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My concern is if he’s being allowed to do what he wants or if the budget is holding him back. If he really is in control and this is his plan so be it. But, he/they must understand that revenues will start increase when the interest level of the average fan increases. Obviously playing 162 games will help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m guessing there will be a restored optimism from actually having a milb season. The draft will be big for Elias this year.
 

It’s looking like we’ll be in a complete tear down at the deadline with Cobb, Galvis, Severino, Mancini, and Santander all moving. 
 

With all that being said, I think you have to give him till 2023. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I’m guessing there will be a restored optimism from actually having a milb season. The draft will be big for Elias this year.
 

It’s looking like we’ll be in a complete tear down at the deadline with Cobb, Galvis, Severino, Mancini, and Santander all moving. 
 

With all that being said, I think you have to give him till 2023. 

There is no real reason to trade Galvis or Severino if they will no bring back a prospect.  I doubt they will.    I think Elias will have to be blown away with an offer to trade Santander.     Cobb and Mancini will be on the block if they are healthy and productive at the deadline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Judging by what we have seen so far why would a team be eager to promote him?

So far he's upped the technology, slashed payroll and collected high draft picks. 

I haven't seen anything so far that makes me think I have to have this guy as my team president.

If you believe, like me, that he's created a much stronger amateur player acquisition and development program then you have to like what he's done. I also think the data will put all of our guys, major and minor leagues, into a better position to succeed. 

I'm assuming that given whatever resources he'd want, eventually he'd be spending on free agents and active in the trade market. I'm also assuming that's not in the cards right now, which makes what he's doing on the minor league side even more important. 

I am assuming. I don't know what the facts are. I just think he's the most capable talent evaluator and developer I've seen in Baltimore during my life. His leash is VERY long for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • One last thought. When the reserve clause died in court and all players could become free agents every year, the players union was smart and agreed to a service requirement. It was good for salaries and good for the sport to control supply/demand, even if it seemed like a giveaway by the players. If there was a non-performance clause built into free agent contracts that gave some level of relief to owners, it would benefit salaries and the sport. Small to mid size teams would have more ability to chase top talent because the affect of a bad contract would be less calamitous to their limited payroll means if it was discounted by some percentage for non-performance. Ask Scott Boras if he’d rather have three teams bidding for his client or six. Our very own Albert Belle contract made insuring contracts fairly cost prohibitive (though it kinda seems like we’re keeping Davis on the roster for some reason other than insanity). But that practice of insuring contracts showed that there’s more money to spend on players if you give owners some level of protection from disaster contracts like Davis. Owners used to pay huge amounts to insure contracts before they became cost prohibitive. So if it’s good for competitiveness by allowing smaller teams to be more aggressive, and it’s good for player salaries, and it’s good for owners by protecting their investments, by what principle is a player entitled to the full value of a contract that they have essentially defaulted on for non-performance? 
    • By the way, I agree that Davis’ contract was insanely stupid long before he showed us how stupid it was by his performance. Angeles victimized himself. But I’m talking more generally about non-performance of contracts. I think the top earners would fare even better if not for the associated risks by ownership. They aren’t playing with Monopoly money. The risk builds a discounting into what owners will spend. And smaller market teams are less able to take risks because the affect of one Davis-like contract on their smaller payroll is huge. On what principle should players receive the full value of a contract they unable to satisfy competently? We’re rained out tonight....I wouldn’t be asking otherwise. Wait, did you call me noob?  
    • How about a 10 minute deep cleaning between each use of a bathroom stall.  That would be a smarter measure to stop the spread of Covid.  (Or even hourly cleaning of bathroom stalls).  How many Covid infections have really been spread by "outside food"?
    • “Congratulations Mr. O’Corn, I’m thrilled to hire you as my new GM. I’ve always had a real respect, I mean that most sincerely. Obviously we all want to win, I want to win a championship. And I know you want a long career in baseball. and you’d like to keep your kids in school here in Baltimore. Now tell me, should I give you $123 million to work with or $100 million? Which is going to give you a better shot at delivering me a World Series champion?”
    • A catcher can block the plate once he has possession of the ball. Just not before.  Here is the full text of Rule 7.13(2): Unless the catcher is in possession of the ball, the catcher cannot block the pathway of the runner as he is attempting to score.  If, in the judgment of the Umpire, the catcher without possession of the ball blocks the pathway of the runner, the Umpire shall call or signal the runner safe. Notwithstanding the above, it shall not be considered a violation of this Rule 7.13 if the catcher blocks the pathway of the runner in order to field a throw, and the Umpire determines that the catcher could not have fielded the ball without blocking the pathway of the runner and that contact with the runner was unavoidable.
    • Tony - I’m not a HIPAA lawyer, but you shouldn’t assume that because the O’s were authorized to disclose he had myocarditis that they are authorized to provide further details or updates.   Even within the organization, except on a need to know basis.    Still, I do find the situation weird and mysterious.  If I were Kjerstad, I’d want Oriole fans to know that I had a good reason for being out.    I hope he will be OK and gets on the field as soon as he can.    
    • MFYs have had numerous examples of big contracts gone bust (the "Fat Toad" comes to mind, LOL). No sweat; just move on to the next.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...