Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Will Roch actually ask his questions?

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Rene88 said:

I am disappointed the OH is taking jabs at Roch who works very hard at his job. How about some more criticism of Jim Hunter who literally makes watching a game torture with his homerism?

I will say this, I think we will see sooner than later how much power Elias has with all hires throughout the org. Do we have more Joe Angel types (talented and unbiased) or more Jim Hunter and Bordick types. A good GM would have influence on those things even if they don't hire them directly. 

No one is saying Roch doesn't work hard.  I like Roch.  I think everyone likes Roch.  It's not a question about how hard he works, it's that he's only given so much information and/or only allowed to reveal so much.  He AND Jim Hunter are both paid to be positive, etc.  Roch and Hunter will never ask hard hitting questions because...well, Jon Miller can tell you all about being paid by the team and being critical of them.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Frobby said:

I don’t really want to single Roch out.    But it seems fair to ask, if he’s going to write a blog identifying the pertinent questions, shouldn’t he then be asking those questions?

Of course Meoli, Ghiroli and whoever else is at the “introduction” should be asking these questions too.    

I think we need to stop expecting Roch to be asking the hard questions. He is a blogger for MASN. That role inherently does not allow him the freedom to be a tough journalist. We should look to The Sun, 105.7, national reporters, and basically anyone else for that.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, ScGO's said:

I wonder if Elias could use analytics to figure out how to fix Davis?  I'm sure it doesn't always work like that though...

I'm very interested in seeing how he handles scouting.  Hopefully tons of hires.  How do I apply?

My next big interest is what he thinks of our 40 man roster and our current milb system.  

Another question I would ask too, does he have any ideas on how to use the current intl money?

You can warp the Davis question up in as many fancy analytics as you'd like, it'll come down to the old baseball adage, Hit 'em where they aint

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, CosVT said:

You can warp the Davis question up in as many fancy analytics as you'd like, it'll come down to the old baseball adage, Hit 'em where they aint

Hit ‘em at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Rene88 said:

I am disappointed the OH is taking jabs at Roch who works very hard at his job. How about some more criticism of Jim Hunter who literally makes watching a game torture with his homerism?

I will say this, I think we will see sooner than later how much power Elias has with all hires throughout the org. Do we have more Joe Angel types (talented and unbiased) or more Jim Hunter and Bordick types. A good GM would have influence on those things even if they don't hire them directly. 

The problem I have with Roch is that I feel like he presents himself as a reporter, but he's really just a PR man in disguise for the team. And the only reason that we and the rest of the media even pay him any attention is because the Angelos family has such a contentious relationship with the Baltimore Sun that no one else seems to have access to them. So we're left with trying to dissect the morsels that Roch shares on behalf of the propaganda machine. 

And the difference between Roch and Jim Hunter is that I can see the game with my own eyes and make my own informed decision (regardless of what Hunter says). We can't do the same with Roch. I personally don't read his blog or follow him at all and I think everyone else would be wise to the same. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, theocean said:

I think we need to stop expecting Roch to be asking the hard questions. He is a blogger for MASN. That role inherently does not allow him the freedom to be a tough journalist. We should look to The Sun, 105.7, national reporters, and basically anyone else for that.

The problem is stations like 105.7 present Roch as their "Orioles Expert". And the Orioles are so insignificant on the national level that they don't seem to get much attention. Certainly not as much as the winning and/or big market teams. So we're left to get our news from a glorified PR man. It's a great situation for the team, because they can have Roch spew whatever propaganda they want and hardly anyone will question. It's a shame we don't have a legitimate local beat writer who follows the team. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

The problem I have with Roch is that I feel like he presents himself as a reporter, but he's really just a PR man in disguise for the team. And the only reason that we and the rest of the media even pay him any attention is because the Angelos family has such a contentious relationship with the Baltimore Sun that no one else seems to have access to them. So we're left with trying to dissect the morsels that Roch shares on behalf of the propaganda machine. 

And the difference between Roch and Jim Hunter is that I can see the game with my own eyes and make my own informed decision (regardless of what Hunter says). We can't do the same with Roch. I personally don't read his blog or follow him at all and I think everyone else would be wise to the same. 

I think they could replace Roch with a social media savvy recent journalism graduate and things would continue to move along just fine.  Might even be an improvement if their Twitter game is on point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll ask again, how do you guys think Elias would respond to those questions? There's a 99.9% probability that he would be very positive and fairly circumspect. It would be really stupid to say anything contentious or negative at the introductory press conference. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the questions did get asked.    Kudos to the media members who attended, they did their job.   

I thought of another question today — will the way in which the O’s conduct medical evaluations change?    Is that within Elias’ purview?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I thought of another question today — will the way in which the O’s conduct medical evaluations change?    Is that within Elias’ purview?

My understanding is these three are still in charge
eaiGsa0.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • The part of this no one (at least that I've seen) talks about is what is the impact of sign stealing?  Of course we have no real data whatsoever.  No double-blind studies of how Jose Altuve would hit with and without knowing what's coming.  We have no idea how often he got the signs.  We have some apples-to-pears data from home/road games, but home/road splits are going to be different anyway.  And the data is mixed; Altuve had a big home split last year, but an equally big away split in 2018. It's like PEDs.  No really good data on anything, so the assumption is that it takes an average dude and turns him into an MVP.  But the reality is almost certainly much messier, much less clear cut.  Some people did it all the time, some rarely, some never.  The benefits were almost certainly all over the place from negative impacts from side effects to massive performance gains.  But we're just guessing.  Same thing with sign stealing.  Some will assume that this is worth 25 wins to the Astros, but we have no idea if it's even a significant thing.  For all we know it's like corking your bat; the benefits of that over legal bats are usually zero or worse.  Sign stealing has been so prevalent over the years we've all heard the stories of batters who didn't want to know.  It messes with their approach and their heads if they're tipped off to what's probably coming. In the end we can probably make the assumption that stealing signs helps the average batter somewhat.  But we have no idea of the actual impact.
    • I think “otherworldly” is a huge overstatement of what he’d need to be offensively to compensate for his defense.      Last year he was worth 0.1 rWAR, -0.2 fWAR, so basically replacement level.   He was 48th of 68 catchers who had at least 100 plate appearances in fWAR, so that places him solidly in the middle of second string catchers in overall value.    With a decent improvement in his offense, he’d be above average overall for a backup catcher.     Somewhere between .750-.775 OPS would take him off the cusp, IMO.   I don’t consider that “otherworldly.” By the way, I’m using WAR because it’s available, but I don’t completely trust it for catchers.    
    • Yes, but we have out performed them in the offseason getting rid of Villar and Bundy. 
    • This one slipped by me until Roch mentioned it today in his blog.   He was signed on Jan 10th. This looks like a Wojo signing to me.    Long time minor league starter,  who has had a cup of coffee in the majors. From the Dominican. Between AAA and the winter league his stats this past season are: 19-3,    2.01 ERA,  29 S,   188.1 IP,  171 H,   162 SO,  1.019 WHIP He played with Houston at AAA in 2016 going 12-1, 3.12 ERA in the PCL.   So Elias knows  him well. Valdez doesn't look like someone that is ticketed for the AAA rotation that already has 6 starters in it.   If he shows something in ST he could be in the O's rotation or long relief.  If he doesn't show enough in ST he is probably gone. https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=valdez001ces
    • The Super Bowl is going to be hard to pick. Need a few days.
    • Caleb signed a minor league contract with the Toronto Blue Jays.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...