Jump to content
Dark Helmet

Matt Wieters

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

I'd rather go with Wynns and maybe Susac/Cervenka as a backup than go with retreads. Nothing is worse than losing with players you know won't ever be part of a winning team here. 

I think that’s probably true of the three players mentioned above, as well as Wieters.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

If the team placed so much value on having a catching mentor they should have just kept Caleb Joseph. Targeting Matt Wieters makes no sense for this team at all. The coaches can help Sisco. That's what they're paid to do. 

I'm looking at it as more of who can mentor and produce. And Matt still put up better numbers than Caleb.  For nostalgia, sure I'd keep Caleb. He became a cult hero. But I'm not talking nostalgia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

I'm looking at it as more of who can mentor and produce. And Matt still put up better numbers than Caleb.  For nostalgia, sure I'd keep Caleb. He became a cult hero. But I'm not talking nostalgia.

Offensively Wieters ranked 28th among catchers last season (33rd in WAR). I'm honestly not sure how much better he is than Joseph. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Frobby said:

If salary were equal, would you rather have Joseph or Wieters at this point in their careers?    And no fair saying “neither.”

Counselor, given the specific and careful wording of your question, I would have to say....

I would not take either. ;) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Frobby said:

If salary were equal, would you rather have Joseph or Wieters at this point in their careers?    And no fair saying “neither.”

Wieters. The Nationals were 82-80 last season, but 41-35 in games he played (includes three games when he only pinch-hit). He posted a .739 OPS as a starter and 830 in games they won. 

Wieters always struck me as a leader on the field; the team's quarterback. I don't know if he still is today, but Joseph never struck me as more than a nice guy and cheerleader. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mdbdotcom said:

Wieters. The Nationals were 82-80 last season, but 41-35 in games he played (includes three games when he only pinch-hit). He posted a .739 OPS as a starter and 830 in games they won. 

Wieters always struck me as a leader on the field; the team's quarterback. I don't know if he still is today, but Joseph never struck me as more than a nice guy and cheerleader. 

I agree.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I wouldn't mind seeing Wieters back.  And I wasn't even a big fan of his while he was here.

Whoever they get, I just hope they're good at handling young pitchers.  It's so cliche, but a Crash Davis type.

Just wondering who these "young pitchers" with fragile egos and timidity are?  Hess?  Carroll?  Yefri? Ortiz?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the O's wanted a veteran catcher, they would have just kept Caleb who is cheaper than Wieters, has similar defensive abilities to Wieters, is well-liked, and, like Wieters, doesn't bring a lot of offense to the table. 

Therefore, it makes more sense to simply resign Caleb for a million or so than pay Wieters the $5 or whatever it takes to get him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, interloper said:

If the O's wanted a veteran catcher, they would have just kept Caleb who is cheaper than Wieters, has similar defensive abilities to Wieters, is well-liked, and, like Wieters, doesn't bring a lot of offense to the table. 

Therefore, it makes more sense to simply resign Caleb for a million or so than pay Wieters the $5 or whatever it takes to get him. 

Joseph was actually better defensively than Wieters last year (and considerably cheaper). There's no argument for signing Wieters other than nostalgia. I really enjoy 90% of the discussion on this message board, but I really wish some posters would stop trying to live in the past. There's a big pool of free agents out there who aren't former Orioles and they're not that hard to find. Just Google "MLB free agents".  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, interloper said:

If the O's wanted a veteran catcher, they would have just kept Caleb who is cheaper than Wieters, has similar defensive abilities to Wieters, is well-liked, and, like Wieters, doesn't bring a lot of offense to the table. 

Therefore, it makes more sense to simply resign Caleb for a million or so than pay Wieters the $5 or whatever it takes to get him. 

First of all, I hope nobody is suggesting paying Wieters $5 mm.  My guess is that the most he’ll get in the FA market is maybe half that amount.   

But I think it’s misleading to say that Joseph “like Wieters doesn’t bring a lot of offense to the table.”  Joseph is a career .623 OPS guy, while Wieters is a career .725 guy who had never had an OPS as low as .623 in a season.   Wieters isn’t a great offensive catcher, but he’s much better than Joseph and his floor on offense is much higher.

I’m not saying this to argue for Wieters’ return, I just don’t like the false equivalency here.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Frobby said:

First of all, I hope nobody is suggesting paying Wieters $5 mm.  My guess is that the most he’ll get in the FA market is maybe half that amount.   

But I think it’s misleading to say that Joseph “like Wieters doesn’t bring a lot of offense to the table.”  Joseph is a career .623 OPS guy, while Wieters is a career .725 guy who had never had an OPS as low as .623 in a season.   Wieters isn’t a great offensive catcher, but he’s much better than Joseph and his floor on offense is much higher.

I’m not saying this to argue for Wieters’ return, I just don’t like the false equivalency here.  

Ok well nice dismantling of my mostly throwaway comment I guess lol.

Just saying, they both kind of suck, and if we want a veteran catcher, we just let one go and he can be had for pennies, probably. We might as well not spend the extra money it would take to get Wieters' .725 career OPS which would not move the needle of anything whatsoever. Play the young guys. Wynns can handle the staff, IMO. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Dark Helmet said:

I'm looking at it as more of who can mentor and produce. And Matt still put up better numbers than Caleb.  For nostalgia, sure I'd keep Caleb. He became a cult hero. But I'm not talking nostalgia.

Why has Caleb become a cult hero?  He has been terrible.   Wieters had some great seasons with the club.  Seen tons of people wearing Wieters jersey's in the stands not too many wearing Caleb jerseys.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, interloper said:

Ok well nice dismantling of my mostly throwaway comment I guess lol.

Just saying, they both kind of suck, and if we want a veteran catcher, we just let one go and he can be had for pennies, probably. We might as well not spend the extra money it would take to get Wieters' .725 career OPS which would not move the needle of anything whatsoever. Play the young guys. Wynns can handle the staff, IMO. 

I don’t feel well qualified to judge whether it would materially assist the pitchers to have a veteran major league catcher on hand to work with one of the younger catchers.    I’ll leave that to the guys in the front office to decide.    

Not that I want to make too much of it, but the O’s had a 5.00 ERA with Caleb behind the plate, 5.02 with Sisco and 6.02 with Wynns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Minor League Depth Chart

2021 Prospect Power Rankings

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I was looking at the pitching free agents available over at MLBtraderumors.com, and I remember thinking that we are going to look at the worst guy in the pile, and then manage to find someone worse.
    • It had an assist from generic rooting for Game 7 and more baseball, but being in the Astros corner for that rally (perhaps marking high water mark of Nate Eovaldi career attainment) was a fun 8th/9th inning. I didn't love still using Pressly with the big lead, but looking at Roster Resource everybody but tonight's bulk hero Cristian Javier had pitched yesterday except Odorizzi, so Dusty maybe didn't have another option besides sending Jake Odorizzi down there to try and warm up hastily as they were making it 9-2.   Top of Red Sox lineup got precious looks at Pressly going towards last three games. I guess we get Framber v. Sale/Houck tomorrow afternoon.
    • I thought it would be interesting to keep up with all the different players who are projected by different publications for the Orioles to choose as the top draft pick in 2022. Of course some of these publications will have much more merit than others but I'll list everything I come across just for the sake of interest. Initially, here is what I see: Elijah Green.   https://throughthefencebaseball.com/2022-mlb-mock-draft-1-0-elijah-green-brooks-lee/ Brooks Lee.  http://www.mymlbdraft.com/MLB-Mock-Draft Terrmarr Johnson.   https://medium.com/minor-league-madhouse/2022-mlb-mock-draft-end-of-season-edition-ae9f30e87719 Druw Jones.   https://www.prospectslive.com/prospects-live/2021/10/3/a-why-so-soon-2022-mlb-mock-draft  
    • We need ILBs that push Queen to special teams.
    • Dodgers Will Smith 3.28.1995, 32nd pick in the draft from Louisville Lamar Jackson 1.7.1997, 32nd pick in the draft from Louisville Working out pretty well for both clubs. These are the kinds of things that four+ hour 8.5 inning games let you think up. Smith settling into cleanup for a juggernaut as a 26-year-old catcher - go get' em Adley. Fantastic game today making it a series* - Dodgers have first franchise 3-run rally late in postseason to set alongside franchise record for Wins this year.   Evan Phillips today's streamer adding his bit to the data set at David Price's expense around RP10 being >>> SP4 in baseball world with these roster rules.   I imagine it feels somewhat incorrect to Friedman he can't option him tonight. *I probably still might have guessed Dodgers ~20% shot even if they lost today.  
    • Good to hear that he is already undergoing chemotherapy and that he has the right mindset to beat this terrible enemy.  
    • Adley will help to improve the team some, but he cannot create talent where there is pitifully little.  Now with all the high draft choices and the horrible records of the past few years, of course one would expect to see some improvement in W/L.  But as my 95 year Grandmother always  said before she passed on,  YOU CANNOT MAKE A SILK PURSE OUT OF A SOWS EAR.  Same applies to baseball talent.  You cannot  come up with enough talent in the short term, and maybe a little beyond,  to  overcome  all the sins of  the previous number of years.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...