Jump to content
Diehard_O's_Fan

MLB and Union talk major rule changes

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Why?  Because teams have used the absence of roster rules to evolve strategies that are more optimal for winning,

I do believe the rules about Guaranteed contracts, Limited Option Years, Rule 5 protection, and how long you need to be out on optional assignment are also limiting on teams rosters.

 

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It's like the four-corners in basketball, but perhaps less extreme.  Why should the basketball powers-that-be dictate what strategies teams should use?  That's obvious: the strategies were good to win, but horrific from the standpoint of fan experience. 

So you would like to see limits on shifts in the infield and outfield???  These are used under the same principal as the "Four r corners in Basketball.

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

What if teams figured out that if they had 25 pitchers on the roster each throwing to one or two batters, the other team would never get a hit?  The whole team would be pitchers, the fielders would be out-of-position pitchers, standing out there on the off chance that someone didn't strike out.  Wouldn't it be incumbent on the league to stop this, because nobody wants to watch 27 guys strike out every game?

Teams would need to score to win.  I some how doubt using a roster with Twenty-Five pitchers would give you much of a scoring chance.

 

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

At some point the league has to step up and say we need to make this something people want to watch and pay for.  It can't all be about the purity of 100+ year old rules.

Baseball got to where it is at with this archaic rules.  Change for the sake of change may lose them as many fans as they would hope to gain.  NASCAR made rules changes and have lost attendance and ratings.  Football made changes and net ratings dropped.  Changes are not always a good thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, thezeroes said:

So you would like to see limits on shifts in the infield and outfield???  These are used under the same principal as the "Four r corners in Basketball.

Baseball got to where it is at with this archaic rules.  Change for the sake of change may lose them as many fans as they would hope to gain.  NASCAR made rules changes and have lost attendance and ratings.  Football made changes and net ratings dropped.  Changes are not always a good thing.

Shifts don't take 5-4 and 7-5 games and turn them all into 1-0 games.  Shifts are only detrimental to the sport in that a few fans find them distasteful, but I think most are good with it.  Plus, there's an easy way around them: just hit where nobody is standing.

It's not change for change's sake.  It's change to make for a more engaging, poplar, sport that might appeal more broadly to people under the age of 50.  Baseball has changed one major rule in the last 115 years, and the game has gone from eight homers leading the league and pitchers throwing 400 innings to teams hitting 300 homers and the Cy Young winner sometimes throwing 180 innings.  Strikeouts have gone from two a game to nine.  Teams used to use 1.5 pitchers a game, now its five or six.  Baseball will change whether the rules do or not.  It's up to the powers-that-be to make the change into something positive, or otherwise let it run uncontrolled and have no input on where the game ends up and whether or not anyone likes it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It's change to make for a more engaging, poplar, sport that might appeal more broadly to people under the age of 50. 

I do think the change to the new "SUPER BALL" this year has done more for the need/want of having more pitchers on the roster.  Would MLB have the guts to go back to the 1960's style of ball.  Home Runs would decrease by a large margin.  Balls that are now going out would be "Warning Track Power".  The need for Max Effort out of pitchers would also wane since the Homeruns would be cut  by a third.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I think this is step one.  They could start lowering the number of allowed pitchers in a few years to 12, then 11, then 10.  To me that's the only sure-fire way of getting individual pitchers to pitch more, and back off from max effort all the time.

And I think they decided to make these irrelevant rules defining when a non-pitcher can pitch just to show they're putting something in the rules drawing a line between pitchers and non-pitchers.  And to keep teams from stashing an extra real pitcher on the bench as a position player for use in real game situations.

Wow !! -- that's deep -- not sure if it is deep thought or deep state😧

Perhaps, the cabal at MLB is pushing teams to develop more player versions of the 1918-1919 Babe Ruth😄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Alberto will make the most of those arbitration eligible guys at maybe $3 million next year. Those other guys made $10+ million. Nunez and Valaika could be non-tendered, but not because of their exorbitant salaries. I don't think Armstrong will get non-tendered because he might make $800K rather than $600K. Santander, Severino and Alberto aren't getting non-tendered this year and none of them have enough surplus value to merit trading. Maybe Santander if he has a great 2021 is a trade chip, but he needs to show it for a full season to be a valuable trade chip. Trading Alberto or Severino would just be shuffling deck chairs and my guess is it would look bad if they traded EVERYONE that made over the minimum. Cobb could be traded but they probably get a better return at the trade deadline, and my guess is that they would end up having to pick up the same amount of salary if they traded him in July as they would if they traded him in the offseason.
    • o   Between 1954 and 1957, each of the MVO's for those seasons are not in the Orioles Hall-of-Fame ...... they are Chuck Diering (1954), Dave Philley (1955), Bob Nieman (1956), and Billy Gardner (1957.)   The other MVO's since then whom are not in the Orioles Hall-of-Fame are Don Aase (1986), Larry Sheets (1987), Mike Devereaux (1992), Rafael Palmeiro (1995, 1996, and 1998), Randy Myers (1997), Delino DeShields Sr. (2000), Jeff Conine (2001), Rodrigo Lopez (2002), Jay Gibbons (2003), Miguel Tejada (2004 and 2006), Aubrey Huff (2008), Luke Scott (2010), and Nelson Cruz (2014.)   More recent MVO's whom are not yet in the Orioles Hall-of-Fame but who may be inducted in the future upon eligibility are Nick Markakis (2007), Adam Jones (2011, 2012, and 2018), Chris Davis (2013 and 2015), Manny Machado (2016), Jonathan Schoop (2017), Trey Mancini (2019), and Anthony Santander (2020) ...... Nelson Cruz was only with the Orioles for one season (2014), but oh what a season it was (both for Cruz individually, and for the Orioles as a team.)     M.V.O. ) (1954 - Present)   1954 – Chuck Diering 1955 – Dave Philley 1956 – Bob Nieman 1957 – Billy Gardner 1958 – Gus Triandos 1959 – Gene Woodling 1960 – Brooks Robinson 1961 – Jim Gentile 1962 – Brooks Robinson 1963 – Stu Miller 1964 – Brooks Robinson 1965 – Stu Miller 1966 – Frank Robinson 1967 – Frank Robinson 1968 – Dave McNally 1969 – Boog Powell 1970 – Boog Powell 1971 – Brooks Robinson, Frank Robinson 1972 – Jim Palmer 1973 – Jim Palmer 1974 – Paul Blair, Mike Cuellar 1975 – Ken Singleton 1976 – Lee May 1977 – Ken Singleton 1978 – Eddie Murray 1979 – Ken Singleton 1980 – Al Bumbry 1981 – Eddie Murray 1982 – Eddie Murray 1983 – Eddie Murray, Cal Ripken Jr. 1984 – Eddie Murray 1985 – Eddie Murray 1986 – Don Aase 1987 – Larry Sheets 1988 – Eddie Murray, Cal Ripken Jr. 1989 – Gregg Olson 1990 – Cal Ripken Jr. 1991 – Cal Ripken Jr. 1992 – Mike Devereaux 1993 – Chris Hoiles 1994 – No Award Given 1995 – Rafael Palmeiro 1996 – Rafael Palmeiro 1997 – Randy Myers 1998 – Rafael Palmeiro 1999 – B.J. Surhoff 2000 – Delino DeShields Sr. 2001 – Jeff Conine 2002 – Rodrigo Lopez 2003 – Jay Gibbons 2004 – Miguel Tejada 2005 – Brian Roberts 2006 – Miguel Tedada 2007 – Nick Markakis 2008 – Aubrey Huff 2009 – Brian Roberts 2010 – Luke Scott 2011 – Adam Jones 2012 – Adam Jones 2013 – Chris Davis 2014 – Nelson Cruz 2015 – Chris Davis 2016 – Manny Machado 2017 – Jonathan Schoop 2018 – Adam Jones 2019 - Trey Mancini 2020 - Anthony Santander   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Baltimore_Orioles_awards#Most_Vaulable_Oriole   https://www.mlb.com/orioles/history/orioles-hall-of-fame   o
    • I have thought Iglesias could be a prime trade target.  It could come this offseason or perhaps we (and an acquiring team) would want to see him off to a good start offensively - even 775 OPS should generate a quality return.  Depending on how Iggy is doing would impact the prospect I want back.  Top 15ish sounds about right, but maybe more if Iggy does well in April and May ahead of a deal. Iggy should have won the MVP.  Crazy to lineup Mountcastle's stats with Santander's and give it to Santander.  Anyone voting for Alberto, Nunez or Severino in their top 3 should be disqualified from ever watching baseball again.
    • Elias has made moves to save money.  Traded Villar, Bundy, Cashner.  This off season Cobb is in the last year of his contract.   Alberto has his 2nd salary arbitration year. Santander, Severino, Armstrong, Valaika and Nunez are all arbitration eligible for the first time. Will Elias make moves to keep the team cheap?
    • The right choice IMO.    Congrats to him.    I hope his strong performance in a relatively short period this year carries over into 2021. Santander has now played just a little more than a full season’s worth of games (176) and his 162-game average is 29 HR, 91 RBI to go with his career .759 OPS (which includes his two partial Rule 5 seasons).     
    • o   Santander won it (thanks for the info, Sports Guy.)   This is mildly reminiscent of when Erik Bedard led the American League in Strikeouts-Per-9 Innings (10.929), Hits-Per-9 Innings (6.973), and was among the league leaders in Strikeouts (221) in spite of having missed the final 5 weeks of the season due to injury.   o
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...