Jump to content
Diehard_O's_Fan

MLB and Union talk major rule changes

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Where?  Since 2000 there are five pitchers (min 100 PAs) with a career OPS better than Mark Belanger.  Brandon Backe and Brian Bohanan barely cleared the 100 PA minimum.  Mike Hampton got most of his ABs in pre-humidor Colorado, and Dontrelle Willis and Carlos Zambrano had .650ish OPSes and 10:1 K:BB ratios.  You can round off the number of good hitting pitchers who'd qualify as good at any other position to zero.

The DH exists mainly because pitchers hitting are several orders of magnitude worse than any other position hitting. On a scale where 100 is average the 10 positions are something like 112, 109, 107, 102, 100, 99, 97, 92, 89, 28.

Brumgarner leads active pitchers with 17 Home Runs hit.

And in my best Drungo voice:

Quote

The first pitcher to officially hit a home run was Jack Manning, who accomplished the feat on August 3, 1876.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Beef Supreme said:

I like the set-up as it is currently so that fans who like the DH can enjoy the game as well as fans who like to have pitchers hitting.

Vive la difference!

Could you imagne the crying from the NL purists if they eliminated Stephen Strasburg OPSing .391?  It would be like you took away Christmas and their birthday.  Let them have a #9 hitter who makes Chris Davis look like Wee Willie Keeler, just so long as that doesn't infect the AL.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

 I think that the three batter rule is okay.  But I'd rather they just reduce the number of pitchers allowed on the roster (over a number of years) to eight or nine.  You'd have to structure the rule to avoid cheating, and not allow sending guys down to AAA every three days.  But if you could stay to the spirit of the rule you'd both eliminate LOOGYs, and force starters to go longer.  Might bring back the four-man rotation.  And it would stunt the trend towards 100% max effort pitching, possibly reducing injuries.

 You'd probably have to unjuice the ball at the same time.

I remember reading Earl Weavers book in the day and he was saying that having 8 pitchers on the roster was better than 9 as the extra pitcher would only help you in a loss but having extra hitters would help you in games you have a chance to win.  Boy has the game changed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

And in my best Drungo voice:

The first pitcher to officially hit a home run was Jack Manning, who accomplished the feat on August 3, 1876.

That was the first NL pitcher.  There's some dispute about whether to call the 1871-75 National Association a major league, but if you do multiple pitchers homered in that league. And if you don't use the "major league" qualifier I'm sure pitchers hit homers in 1840s and before, including Jim Creighton who died after rupturing an internal organ while completing a mighty home run swing in (IIRC) 1861.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Could you imagne the crying from the NL purists if they eliminated Stephen Strasburg OPSing .391?  It would be like you took away Christmas and their birthday.  Let them have a #9 hitter who makes Chris Davis look like Wee Willie Keeler, just so long as that doesn't infect the AL.

At least with Strasburg he contributes with his pitching. I am not sure in what area Davis contributes. I would gladly take Strasburg and his .391 OPS.  And he hit .206 in 2016.   And he had 8 sacrifice bunts in 52 plate appearances last year so unlike Chris he can bunt. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

That was the first NL pitcher.  There's some dispute about whether to call the 1871-75 National Association a major league, but if you do multiple pitchers homered in that league. And if you don't use the "major league" qualifier I'm sure pitchers hit homers in 1840s and before, including Jim Creighton who died after rupturing an internal organ while completing a mighty home run swing in (IIRC) 1861.

Amazing how much baseball history you know.

Salute

:new_beer::)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Number5 said:

This is more easily resolved by eliminating interleague play.  The novelty of that has worn off, anyway.  Why not go back to having fair and balanced schedules?

I'm a fan of re-aligning into regional leagues of 8-12 teams each.  You play almost all or even all of the schedule in your regional league.  You never play a regular season game more than one time zone away, and the whole league plays exactly the same schedule.  You go back to the playoffs and All Star game being your chance to see the guys in the other leagues.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to the the DH optional in inter league play. Adding an extra roster spot to teams with the poorest records Say 2 to the bottom 10, 1 the the middle 10 , top 10 stays the same. Robo Plate Ump. Minimum payroll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not be surprised if the league's goal is to implement a two-batter minimum for pitchers. They may have started the negotiation by listing a three-batter minimum so it looks like they are compromising in good faith.

I would support a two-batter minimum for pitchers. At least that is how I feel about it at this time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, atomic said:

At least with Strasburg he contributes with his pitching. I am not sure in what area Davis contributes. I would gladly take Strasburg and his .391 OPS.  And he hit .206 in 2016.   And he had 8 sacrifice bunts in 52 plate appearances last year so unlike Chris he can bunt. 

Last year the average MLB pitcher hit .119 with a .293 OPS.  They were as far from Chris Davis as Chris Davis was from Mike Moustakas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Beef Supreme said:

I would not be surprised if the league's goal is to implement a two-batter minimum for pitchers. They may have started the negotiation by listing a three-batter minimum so it looks like they are compromising in good faith.

I would support a two-batter minimum for pitchers. At least that is how I feel about it at this time.

Would you also eliminate two pinch-hitters in a row?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Last year the average MLB pitcher hit .119 with a .293 OPS.  They were as far from Chris Davis as Chris Davis was from Mike Moustakas.

Wow and I pulled .118 out of my tail in an earlier post.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Number5 said:

Would you also eliminate two pinch-hitters in a row?

I wouldn't, because offensive substitutes don't interrupt the flow of the game.  Every in-inning pitching change is the equivalent of a three- or four-minute timeout.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That was the first NL pitcher.  There's some dispute about whether to call the 1871-75 National Association a major league, but if you do multiple pitchers homered in that league. And if you don't use the "major league" qualifier I'm sure pitchers hit homers in 1840s and before, including Jim Creighton who died after rupturing an internal organ while completing a mighty home run swing in (IIRC) 1861.

1862.

I expect an apology soon.   ;)

Thanks for the tip, he has a pretty interesting Wikipedia page.  They apparently didn't even call balls and strikes back in those days?   Seems unfathomable now.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • Just in time, the AFL season starts today.    As a reminder, this year the O’s players are on the Surprise Saguaros, and include: Rylan Bannon Cody Carroll Dean Kremer  David Lebron  Mason McCoy Alex Wells  With Austin Hays joining once the major league season ends.   Kyle Moore (Delmarva’s manager) is serving as one of the coaches. The regular season runs through October 25.    I’m looking forward to having some more box scores to read!
    • Was Mancini bad enough last year to be in the running for national comeback player of the year?
    • I don't think this was a case of players and coaches overlooking Temple or letting the big wins get to their head, this was a case of a QB who struggled under the first pressure he saw and awful play calling, particularly in the red zone.  The fact that Temple tried to give them the game twice and the awful play calling kept trying to stuff it up the middle, when they have Piggy, McFarland and Leake. Are you telling me that anyone here thinks if they had spread out the defense, put Piggy in shotgun with McFarland and Leake that they don't think they could get a yard with a option play? My biggest concern is that the game calling is always going to be this unimaginative and awful in the red zone when the line is going to be dominated. Good coordinators understand their weakness and strengths and play to their strengths in personnel and don't try the cookie cutter old school approach. I'm also concerns that Jackson will continue to struggle when he pressured. He's not very mobile back there and once he was under pressure his decision making and accuracy dropped off significantly. That's a yellow flag for me. This game was a giant let down because they had an opportunity to go under a Nationally televised game ranked against Penn State but instead, looked like the same old Terp football program that shrinks as soon as it as a chance to shine. I also have concerns that Locksley did not over rule the play calls and also went for that awful two-point conversion. Had they gone for field goal and made it, the Terps could have gone ahead with a field goal instead of being stuffed twice on the goal line in the 4th QTR. It was one game, and people can improve and learn, but what I saw was a coaching staff and quarterback that appeared to be over their heads in their first real test of adversity.  Now if they can come out and play a good close game against Penn State it might heal some things, but only a win would erase this debacle.
    • My vote goes to all of the fans who actually watched a lot of the O's games on the tube.  Even if the games were used as 'background noise' while you were doing something a lot more pleasurable.  2 thumbs up.  
    • He has certainly hit for more power since coming back from AAA. Not sure if he tweaked something of if he's just running into more pitches, but the power increase has been the biggest difference in hitting of late. If the power is for real, and I'm not sure that it is until I hear he's changed some kind of approach, then he has a chance to stick around for awhile at 3B. He's still a below average 3B overall and will not to have a consistent jump in production to be considered a nugget towards a winning team in the future.
    • I think it clearly Mancini. Especially with the way the AS game went for him and it’s also a comeback year for him. I’d be very surprised if it were anyone else. Though Means and Villar would be solid choices if chosen. 
    • Whoever has the highest WAR. 🙄
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...