Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Rene88

Will Araujo Make The Team?

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, oriole said:

I think he’s expendable. I wonder if they’d keep him on for 17 days and then try to pass him through waivers.

After 17 days, no need for waivers. His options remain intact. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I think I Elias was a great hire.

i just don't like blind allegiance.

I'm a homer to my core. :noidea:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think I Elias was a great hire.

i just don't like blind allegiance.

Elias gets full deference for now.    It’s not blind allegiance, it’s giving him the opportunity to demonstrate his evaluative chops. Once he screws up a few times he won’t get that deference.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, weams said:

After 17 days, no need for waivers. His options remain intact. 

I meant as a way to get him off the 40 man roster or have to offer him back to the Cubs if he clears waivers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, oriole said:

I meant as a way to get him off the 40 man roster or have to offer him back to the Cubs if he clears waivers. 

The Cubs could always claim him that way I guess. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Rene88 said:

He only needs 17 days but is he really worthy of a spot on the 40 man? He has had an awful spring (ERA over 10+)

What say you?

I got to think his spot is dependent on what is on the waiver wire...

 

I think there are several people whose spot is indeed dependent on the waiver wire finds, but I don’t think Araujo is one of them. He is analogous to a guy Acquired for cash considerations, and it only 17 days, they get him for free.

Dan has had inconsistent results from the rule five draft, and it’s possible that current leadership doesn’t think much of this guy, but I think they’ll probably keep him.

Edited by Philip
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, scOtt said:

There's another question! Does he make the team? Playing like a mo-fo.

Yes

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Elias gets full deference for now.    It’s not blind allegiance, it’s giving him the opportunity to demonstrate his evaluative chops. Once he screws up a few times he won’t get that deference.

And he will screw up.  He has been known to swing for the fences, but I'll support his rebuild until the end of the third season. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, weams said:

And he will screw up.  He has been known to swing for the fences, but I'll support his rebuild until the end of the third season. 

Go big or go home!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Philip said:

I think there are several people whose spot is indeed dependent on the waiver wire finds, but I don’t think Araujo is one of them. He is analogous to a guy Acquired for cash considerations, and it only 17 days, they get him for free.

Dan has had inconsistent results from the rule five draft, and it’s possible that current leadership doesn’t think much of this guy, but I think they’ll probably keep him.

Gotta get over this way of thinking... 17 days and the whole idea of “scheming to keep a player”. 

The player is not good. Is 26. Has never had success above A ball. Was drafted in the third round of the Rule 5.  How many players have ever been drafted in the third round of the Rule 5 draft???? He was a “Buck Flier”. He didn’t work out. He was acquired before the selloff and before our own guys needed to be added to the 40 man. 

It’s hard to come out of the bullpen with a changeup being your best pitch. What if the Hitters don’t chase?  Then he’s out there with a below average FB. 

Bottomline... dude was acquired when it made “sense”. Now we have better reliever options that belong on the 40 man over him. Not to mention position players and potential waiver claims. 

I’ll break down the bottom of the 40 man and the likely scenario for OD,

40. Hanser Alberto - He either makes the team, or Escobar is added as a direct replacement. Alberto is out of options. 

39. We have to add a C. Either Sucre or Perez. Who goes?  Arajuo or Wilkerson. Wilkerson is only 1 year older than Arajuo and provides depth in the IF that we are relatively thin at. Arajuo wouldn’t even make AAA’s bullpen. He’d be 26 and in AA. With a below average FB. 

38. What if we really love EY Jr or some great waiver wire opportunity? Then bye bye to both Wilkerson and Arajuo. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think I Elias was a great hire.

i just don't like blind allegiance.

Trust but verify...lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, weams said:

And he will screw up.  He has been known to swing for the fences, but I'll support his rebuild until the end of the third season. 

The "record" has been noted for future disparagement, if applicable.

 

But back to Petey Araujo, if Elias cuts him and Pedro becomes the second coming of Trevor Hoffman in a few years, we can add this to the list of Elias "shortcomings" and why we now hate his hire.  Win win!  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been an advocate of Araujo making the roster and then going down after the 17 days. But I can't say he impresses me right now. Honestly, he looks injured to me. He's not the same guy I saw last spring. Since early May 2018, he's been damaged goods. His velo is down, and his body language tells me something is wrong there. Maybe he's just pressing, trying to make the team, but he's not right.

He had flashed a plus slider to go with the plus split. Those, with a mid 90's FB he used to have, would make him viable if he can be healthy and consistent in his mechanics.

He has not looked good, but he will not be 26 until July. If you think he's a dude in the back end in two years, I think you have to keep him. If they keep him, may have to take 13 pitchers North to cover him a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think that’s the wrong question.   The question is, does it seem likely that in a year or two he’d be one of our best 7?    If so, you put him on the roster for 17 days and then put him in the minors where he belongs.    But if you think it’s highly questionable that he’ll be one of our best 7 in the future, then sayonara.   I’m certainly in no position to judge this.

This.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, weams said:

The Cubs could always claim him that way I guess. 

But then they’d have to keep him on the 40. According to rule 5 rules when returning a player, do they have to stay on original teams 40 man if the drafting team successfully got him through waivers? I’m not an expert on the issue, so I could totally be wrong. It happens quite often actually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • I think  Zach Davies can make a strong case for it, based on his turn around success.
    • While the Orioles continue to make outside hires for various departments, they’re also likely to do some shuffling of personnel in the minors. Nothing is official, but I’ve heard from various people that Single-A Delmarva manager Kyle Moore could join high Single-A Frederick as Ryan Minor’s replacement. Minor league infield coordinator Dave Anderson would be given the managing job with the Shorebirds under this scenario. Delmarva development coach Pat Leyland, son of former major league manager Jim Leyland, might manage one of the Dominican Summer League teams. Triple-A Norfolk hitting coach Butch Davis has been offered a role on Double-A Bowie’s coaching staff. https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2019/09/nunez-hoping-hand-heals-and-hes-available-tonight.html
    • Honestly outside of the truly elite not many SPs go 6+ innings anymore so I'm not sure I'd hold that against him. The telling stat for me is that his era is a 1.5 is better than our next best SP (Bundy). He's literally been a lone diamond in a dumpster fire. 
    • I doubt it, but don’t know who the logical candidates are.
    • Just in time, the AFL season starts today.    As a reminder, this year the O’s players are on the Surprise Saguaros, and include: Rylan Bannon Cody Carroll Dean Kremer  David Lebron  Mason McCoy Alex Wells  With Austin Hays joining once the major league season ends.   Kyle Moore (Delmarva’s manager) is serving as one of the coaches. The regular season runs through October 25.    I’m looking forward to having some more box scores to read!
    • Was Mancini bad enough last year to be in the running for national comeback player of the year?
    • I don't think this was a case of players and coaches overlooking Temple or letting the big wins get to their head, this was a case of a QB who struggled under the first pressure he saw and awful play calling, particularly in the red zone.  The fact that Temple tried to give them the game twice and the awful play calling kept trying to stuff it up the middle, when they have Piggy, McFarland and Leake. Are you telling me that anyone here thinks if they had spread out the defense, put Piggy in shotgun with McFarland and Leake that they don't think they could get a yard with a option play? My biggest concern is that the game calling is always going to be this unimaginative and awful in the red zone when the line is going to be dominated. Good coordinators understand their weakness and strengths and play to their strengths in personnel and don't try the cookie cutter old school approach. I'm also concerns that Jackson will continue to struggle when he pressured. He's not very mobile back there and once he was under pressure his decision making and accuracy dropped off significantly. That's a yellow flag for me. This game was a giant let down because they had an opportunity to go under a Nationally televised game ranked against Penn State but instead, looked like the same old Terp football program that shrinks as soon as it as a chance to shine. I also have concerns that Locksley did not over rule the play calls and also went for that awful two-point conversion. Had they gone for field goal and made it, the Terps could have gone ahead with a field goal instead of being stuffed twice on the goal line in the 4th QTR. It was one game, and people can improve and learn, but what I saw was a coaching staff and quarterback that appeared to be over their heads in their first real test of adversity.  Now if they can come out and play a good close game against Penn State it might heal some things, but only a win would erase this debacle.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...