Jump to content
RVAOsFan

Ryan Mountcastle 2019

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

It’s a flaw, but I’m pretty damned happy with what Mountcastle is doing in AAA.

Comparing what a guy is doing in AAA to what a guy who is only one year younger is doing in the pac-12 is just completely worthless.  I'm sure Mountcastle would be walking plenty in the pac-12 right now too. I guess I also just made the comparison so maybe disregard as completely worthless? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, ChuckS said:

I can't imagine him being a negative at 1B.  Good hands, long, and probably a bit quicker than your average 1B. 

I think he’s made 6 errors, which is a lot for a 1B at this point in the year.    Don’t know about the other aspects of his defense.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think he’s made 6 errors, which is a lot for a 1B at this point in the year.    Don’t know about the other aspects of his defense.   

I know for prospects, looking at errors and fielding pct. is about all we can look at, but those are really not great indicators of defensive capabilities generally. And from baseball ref it looks like he has 4 errors at first and 2 at third.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, weams said:

 

Pretty much a puff piece, though I enjoyed it.    They completely glossed over the fact that the reason he’s changed positions twice is because of his arm.    

Thats OK, though, because it’s looking like the bat’s going to play well at 1B/DH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Pretty much a puff piece, though I enjoyed it.    They completely glossed over the fact that the reason he’s changed positions twice is because of his arm.    

Thats OK, though, because it’s looking like the bat’s going to play well at 1B/DH.

I like Mountcastle as much as the next guy, and now that he's at 1B and doing well I feel even better about him, but calling him versatile is the epitome of a "puff piece".

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leads the Tides with 12 bombs.  .851 OPS although the BB rate is a woeful 3.7%.

Guess being the youngest guy on the team is probably what's most intriguing here.  Wonder if he will get a look in September.  Seems like Elias still wants him to cook a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/14/2019 at 12:55 PM, Aglets said:

Leads the Tides with 12 bombs.  .851 OPS although the BB rate is a woeful 3.7%.

Guess being the youngest guy on the team is probably what's most intriguing here.  Wonder if he will get a look in September.  Seems like Elias still wants him to cook a bit.

This worries me a lot.  I think it greatly limits his upside.  Hays has the same issue.  Both are around 3-4 percent BB rate over their minor league careers.    

I haven't either play enough to know if they are patient early in the count and just let it rip when they get ahead.  I'd be interested to see what their chase percentages are for pitches out of the zone and how that compares to other players. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ChuckS said:

This worries me a lot.  I think it greatly limits his upside.  Hays has the same issue.  Both are around 3-4 percent BB rate over their minor league careers.    

I haven't either play enough to know if they are patient early in the count and just let it rip when they get ahead.  I'd be interested to see what their chase percentages are for pitches out of the zone and how that compares to other players. 

@Tony-OH had a quote from an incident where Mountcastle swung at ball 4 in a 3-0 count with the tying/go ahead runs on base and popped out, where he was confronted and said "if I had hit a home run, you wouldn't be talking to me."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

@Tony-OH had a quote from an incident where Mountcastle swung at ball 4 in a 3-0 count with the tying/go ahead runs on base and popped out, where he was confronted and said "if I had hit a home run, you wouldn't be talking to me."

What boggles my mind is getting up in a 3-0 or 3-1 count and swinging at a pitch that isn't in a particular quadrant of the strike zone that you know you can do some damage with.   I seriously doubt these guys are getting fooled by breaking pitches in counts like that.  Not at the minor league level.  There is no excuse for swinging at ball four. 

So it is essentially making your mind up that you are going to swing before the pitch is thrown.  Schoop did quite a bit of this.  Always drove me nuts.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

@Tony-OH had a quote from an incident where Mountcastle swung at ball 4 in a 3-0 count with the tying/go ahead runs on base and popped out, where he was confronted and said "if I had hit a home run, you wouldn't be talking to me."

Great.  Sounds like he is great at taking instruction and willing to tweak things to improve his game.

At least Davis had some good years before he refused to change his approach at the plate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not excited about Mountcastles' profile.  We have a ton of 1B/DH candidates.  I would look to deal him while he still has some shine on him. Maybe for a lower level middle infielder or pitcher in someone else's system.  You're certainly not going to get a blue chipper for him.  But I expect his ML career to be boring within a year or two.  Mark Trumbo with less power and less patience.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • Just don't give away tomatoes to the fans. 
    • I use cbd on occasion. It does seem to help me fall asleep, but doesn’t help with waking up wide awake a few hours later. 
    • I voted Mancini but I could have gone with Villar as well. I think Villar's lack of effort occasionally and base paths blunders is what shaded me towards Mancini for MVO. Saying that, if Villar did receive it I would not be upset as he clearly has the best WAR despite being forced to play out of position at SS a lot this year.
    • I think when he team is ready to win again if Davis is not preforming in a helpful manner then he  needs to go.   I don't see the O's being at that point yet.   Maybe in another year.    Players get hurt all the time.  As a bench player Davis can step in for them.   Also there are a lot of unproven players that the league may adjust to and they will may be sent down.  (see Mullins, not for Davis but because he is a example of an unproven player that needed to go down)    Davis may find playing time for those players also.   The 26th man makes it easier to keep Davis on the 26 man roster.
    • I have a lot of disconnected, disorganized thoughts on this subject.  I like Tony's suggestions, or at least the acknowledgment of the idea that there are alternate ways of developing players that might be more efficient or at least more cost-effective. A few points: - I've never thought that the current setup was optimal, but rather formed by a series of events more related to economics than player development.  In the beginning all minor league teams were just like major league teams except in small cities.  Only in the 1920s, and then accelerating in the 30s because of the Depression, did the majors start buying up the minors and turning them into development squads instead of teams trying to draw fans and win their pennant.  For 50+ years MLB teams didn't have any full-time affiliates.  That was probably less successful at wringing out all the talent, but MLB got along just fine.  The majors wanted to own the minors to keeps costs down.  They got tired of having to pay $100k for Lefty Grove after a protracted negotiation with Oriole owner Jack Dunn.  Much easier if they just owned Jack Dunn and all the rest of the Orioles. - I think one reason for the sprawling system we have today is MLB contracts, options, and related issues.  I think most good prospects would do just fine as part-time major league players at 20 or 22.  They spend that time in the minors because nobody wants to burn service time.  We've convinced ourselves that prospects would stall if they were utility infielders or relievers at 18 or 20.  But we don't know that, in fact we know many successful MLB players did just that in the pre-draft era, and some even became MLB stars as teenagers.  If service time wasn't a thing (for example, if everyone became a free agent at 28), I think lots of players would shoot through the minors in record time.  And there would be much less need for eight levels of affiliates. - Japan has one level of minors.  I don't know that this is seen as any kind of impediment to development.  Ichiro was in the NPB as a teenager.  They do have more teenagers in the NBP than we see in the US.  But they also don't get to free agency until something like eight or nine years in, so they don't care as much about service time. - Mexico, Korea, Taiwan, the rest of the world... no minors at all.  At least in any cases I know of.  Of course they top out at the equivalent of A or AA levels, so not quite the same.  But nobody else has the resources to have huge, sprawling development systems.  Maybe not optimal, but the world doesn't end when you regularly have 18-year-olds playing alongside 36-year-olds.
    • Obviously we are all hyper sensitive to any kind of soreness with Harvey. I do think this thing is bothering him still an the team wants to be ultra careful with him. At 75.2 IP, he is at twice the amount of innings that he threw in 2018 so he may be near the limit that they wanted to get him this year as well.  Honestly, I wouldn't be upset if they just came out and said they were going to shut him down this year. I have him penciled in as the closer next year and only an injury would get in the way of him having success in that role.
    • One, it's against board rules to call people including players and coaches idiots, so consider this your warning. Secondly, you do know that Harvey was a starter at the beginning of the year and had 10 games with 40 or more pitches. After converting to a reliever, he had two minor league innings where he threw 33 pitches in an inning and one in an inning and a third. Harvey is almost 25-years old. While I don't think anyone, including Hyde preferred that he stayed out there that long in one inning, I don't think Hyde was reckless or an idiot for doing so. If he's incapable of throwing a 30 pitch inning when things aren't going great, what is he then? I think your dislike for Hyde is clouding your judgement here. While you are certainly entitled to your opinion of not liking Hyde, you are not entitled to call him an idiot while doing so here on the Hangout.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...