Jump to content
Frobby

DJ Stewart 2019

Recommended Posts

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

I can't remember the last time I had so much anticipation for something.

I cut it into about 1/6" slices and pan fried it and added some sauerkraut after I flipped it.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Philip said:

Wouldn’t it better to send down Straily(if possible) or even Givens?

Can't send Straily.  I can never keep the rules straight with a case like Givens.  He might be able to refuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I can't remember the last time I had so much anticipation for something.

It gets better when you’re older, I’m now able to get a prostate exam annually.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Cy Bundy said:

It gets better when you’re older, I’m now able to get a prostate exam annually.

You can get those on the secondary market for a lot less money, but insurance won't cover it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imo the only way it should be Stewart is if they plan on keeping him long term even after Davis comes off the il and not shuttling him back in s handful days. 

If Davis comes off the il 10 days will Stewart be able to get enough playing time at bats here it make sense for us to keep him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, jrobb21613 said:

Imo the only way it should be Stewart is if they plan on keeping him long term even after Davis comes off the il and not shuttling him back in s handful days. 

If Davis comes off the il 10 days will Stewart be able to get enough playing time at bats here it make sense for us to keep him?

Why do you feel that way?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Cy Bundy said:

It gets better when you’re older, I’m now able to get a prostate exam annually.

I think I would rather just die.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jrobb21613 said:

Imo the only way it should be Stewart is if they plan on keeping him long term even after Davis comes off the il and not shuttling him back in s handful days. 

If Davis comes off the il 10 days will Stewart be able to get enough playing time at bats here it make sense for us to keep him?

Maybe they know Davis will be gone a lot longer than 10 days.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Maybe they know Davis will be gone a lot longer than 10 days.

It's not like they don't have other guys they could potentially send down other than DJ when Davis returns. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why do you feel that way?

I don’t like the idea or feel like it’s the right thing to do to a prospect you value to have him riding the shuttle back and forth. Now if they don’t feel like Stewart is going to be a impact player for the future than no big deal but if they do treat him with the respect he deserves and I don’t think shuttling a guy back and forth is right. Just my opinion and maybe not a big deal just kinda don’t seem right to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, atomic said:

I think I would rather just die.

These days, when you go through airport security, you get a prostate exam for free!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jrobb21613 said:

I don’t like the idea or feel like it’s the right thing to do to a prospect you value to have him riding the shuttle back and forth. Now if they don’t feel like Stewart is going to be a impact player for the future than no big deal but if they do treat him with the respect he deserves and I don’t think shuttling a guy back and forth is right. Just my opinion and maybe not a big deal just kinda don’t seem right to me.

I think Stewart would much rather take the shuttle back and forth than be riding the bus full time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Is that true? I remember that being part of the negotiations but I dont think it ended up being part of the deal since MLB unilaterally set the number of games. MLBTR seems to think there are still qualifying offers and so does Twitter, based on my searching. Mets beat writer seems to think a qualifying offer is still an option and nobody is correcting her, and since she is a woman on the internet writing about sports, I imagine she would be corrected by a million dudes if she was wrong.
    • I don’t disagree with anything you said, and I’m grateful you said it. Everyone needs a designated driver. But lemme play devil’s advocate for a moment. This is 60 games. ~12 starts instead of 30. 60 starters instead of 162, and several guys who can start a time or two and not ruin our lives. One trait of greatness is consistency. Over 60, that is less important than over 162. Our starters and our pen appear much superior to the last couple years. Not enough to matter in 162 because the long season takes a toll, And quality-or lack thereof- finds its level, but in 60 games? Sure. And remember the short season doesn’t help the best, because the best doesn’t need the benefits a short season offers. The defense is much better too, unless Nunez is playing third, anyway. so yes I agree with you, but it’s not out of the question.  
    • This was a nice read.  And that's not sarcasm.
    • No qualifying offers this season.
    • If Stroman gets a qualifying offer he would cost the O's their third pick (either the comp pick after round 2 or, if that pick is traded, their third round pick). Jake Odorizzi got a QO this off-season at the same age as Stroman with a less successful career to date. I think it is quite likely that Stroman gets one too.
    • I appreciate Wildcards's enthusiasm and optimism. This season is such a wildcard because of all the variables that really anything could happen and I wouldn't be overly surprised. Saying that, there is no reality where this is the beginning of a sustainable winning core.  There is just as much of a chance of this team losing ten straight games as they do of keep playing .500 ball the rest of this season.  As Drungo has point out, there are some guys who have started out this season way above their carer norms. Even if you believe Severino, Ruiz, Alberto and Nunez are breaking out as they enter their primes, does anyone think Cobb, Milone and Wojo are going to keep pitching to their current ERAs? Cobb maybe since it seems his splitter has come back, but I'm not buying long term sustainability on Milone and Hyde has used Wojo right but not letting him go more than twice through an order. 
    • What does that mean? What's the cost of Wildcard's optimism? Also, I don't think what I said constituted being negative.  That's an honest appraisal of the team.    Not much of what we are seeing looks sustainable.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...