Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Rylan Bannon 2019

Recommended Posts

On 8/27/2019 at 4:18 PM, Luke-OH said:

I think the only chance of him being a 50 is at 2B. I think he could definitely be a 45 at 2B and maybe at 3B. He’s better at 2B IMO and the bat plays better there.

 I also think it’d be easy for him to pick up LF/RF and be a non-SS super utility guy. Kind of like Cincinnati is using Josh VanMeter now. Bannon has a better glove, but probably less bat.

Good call on Van Meter for the Rule 5. 

I see Bannon has adopted Mountcastle’s way of thinking.  Why walk when you can hit the ball out of the ballpark?  That’s a not a joke nor a knock.

This hot stretch at the end of the season might be keeping him in the OH top 30.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Infielder Rylan Bannon, 23, hasn’t hit much in the Arizona Fall League, slashing .197/.256/.254 in 18 games with the Surprise Saguaros before last night. But 2019 has been a very good year.

Bannon, obtained from the Dodgers in the Manny Machado trade, batted .317/.344/.549 with 10 doubles, three home runs and 17 RBIs in 20 games with Triple-A Norfolk after moving up from Bowie on Aug. 13.

A scout from another organization who watched Bannon at Bowie compared him to Dodgers infielder Justin Turner “at the same stage.”

That alone should grab your attention.

“He’s a tough, strong, athletic baseball rat,” the scout said. “High intensity with lots of intangibles. Both his bat and glove have made mega strides. He’s much better defensively at third base than second base. He shortened his stroke and is hitting the ball with authority. His power is coming.”

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2019/10/this-that-and-the-other-189.html

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Frobby said:

Infielder Rylan Bannon, 23, hasn’t hit much in the Arizona Fall League, slashing .197/.256/.254 in 18 games with the Surprise Saguaros before last night. But 2019 has been a very good year.

Bannon, obtained from the Dodgers in the Manny Machado trade, batted .317/.344/.549 with 10 doubles, three home runs and 17 RBIs in 20 games with Triple-A Norfolk after moving up from Bowie on Aug. 13.

A scout from another organization who watched Bannon at Bowie compared him to Dodgers infielder Justin Turner “at the same stage.”

That alone should grab your attention.

“He’s a tough, strong, athletic baseball rat,” the scout said. “High intensity with lots of intangibles. Both his bat and glove have made mega strides. He’s much better defensively at third base than second base. He shortened his stroke and is hitting the ball with authority. His power is coming.”

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2019/10/this-that-and-the-other-189.html

Wow, that would be a first I've heard anyone even remotely come up with that comp. 

Let's look at the numbers.

At 23 years old

Bannon (AA):  .255/.345/.394/.740 in 444 PAs with 47/72 BB/K ratio 
Turner (AA): .289/.359/.432/.792 in in 323 PAs with 33/54 BB/K ratio

Now, we have to remember that Justin Turner had an amazing and unorthodox jump in power and production at the age of 29 years old so it's tough to use his minor league comps.

Bannon of course hit well with the super balls being used in AAA, but did not face a lot of the same teams much so word didn't get around on how to pitch him. Over his last 42 games at AA he slashed .214/.313/.372/.686 in 166 PAs, as teams learned they could pitch him up in the zone and induce pop ups and fly outs. 

Bannon does hit lefties well, but he's been pretty ordinary against righties where he slashed .258/.327/.388/.716 in 386 PAs in AA this year. 

Saying that, Turner has similar splits during his AA season at 23. 

I'd be more apt to believe that Bannon can become the pre-LA version of Turner (.260/.323/.361/.684) at the major league level more than the All-Star version.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Tony.   I don’t think anyone watching Turner in the minors thought he’d become what he became.    He’s just a classic case of how you never know for sure how and when a player will develop, and a rare case.    I don’t see how anyone could “expect” Bannon to develop in a similar way.    I agree that matching the “old” Turner is more realistic.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Thanks, Tony.   I don’t think anyone watching Turner in the minors thought he’d become what he became.    He’s just a classic case of how you never know for sure how and when a player will develop, and a rare case.    I don’t see how anyone could “expect” Bannon to develop in a similar way.    I agree that matching the “old” Turner is more realistic.  

That's why I think that's a very disingenuous statement by the "scout". 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Wow, that would be a first I've heard anyone even remotely come up with that comp. 

Let's look at the numbers.

At 23 years old

Bannon (AA):  .255/.345/.394/.740 in 444 PAs with 47/72 BB/K ratio 
Turner (AA): .289/.359/.432/.792 in in 323 PAs with 33/54 BB/K ratio

Now, we have to remember that Justin Turner had an amazing and unorthodox jump in power and production at the age of 29 years old so it's tough to use his minor league comps.

Bannon of course hit well with the super balls being used in AAA, but did not face a lot of the same teams much so word didn't get around on how to pitch him. Over his last 42 games at AA he slashed .214/.313/.372/.686 in 166 PAs, as teams learned they could pitch him up in the zone and induce pop ups and fly outs. 

Bannon does hit lefties well, but he's been pretty ordinary against righties where he slashed .258/.327/.388/.716 in 386 PAs in AA this year. 

Saying that, Turner has similar splits during his AA season at 23. 

I'd be more apt to believe that Bannon can become the pre-LA version of Turner (.260/.323/.361/.684) at the major league level more than the All-Star version.

I agree completely that it’s irresponsible to use Turner as a comp because he had a ridiculous late blooming power surge. 

I will say regarding the AA stats at age 23, despite the lower OPS, Bannon performed better when compared to league average. 120 wRC+ vs 113 wRC+ for Turner. Bannon performed 20% better than league average in AA and 20% better than league average in AAA, which shows the huge discrepancy in league wide offense.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

I agree completely that it’s irresponsible to use Turner as a comp because he had a ridiculous late blooming power surge. 

I will say regarding the AA stats at age 23, despite the lower OPS, Bannon performed better when compared to league average. 120 wRC+ vs 113 wRC+ for Turner. Bannon performed 20% better than league average in AA and 20% better than league average in AAA, which shows the huge discrepancy in league wide offense.

Good points, but I'd expect you take up for your boy! :D

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







×
×
  • Create New...