Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
waroriole

Parking at OPACY

Recommended Posts

Haven’t parked at OPACY in a while. Parking pass online appears sold out, which seems odd. How much is parking, and which lots should be available tomorrow? Thanks 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

$8.  Plenty of parking. The front lots are $10 but that is for season holders. Every once and awhile I have seen them let people in there but rarely. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

$8.  Plenty of parking. The front lots are $10 but that is for season holders. Every once and awhile I have seen them let people in there but rarely. 

Just thought I’d mention that the equivalent lot to the OPACY $10 lot  at Nats Park costs $43.   Orioles fans have it good.   

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Just thought I’d mention that the equivalent lot to the OPACY $10 lot  at Nats Park costs $43.   Orioles fans have it good.   

I saw something last year, may have been on here with all the teams parking costs. I think Orioles are cheapest.  

Yeah, what a difference. A lot you can buy with an extra $33-35 in your pocket.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Just thought I’d mention that the equivalent lot to the OPACY $10 lot  at Nats Park costs $43.   Orioles fans have it good.   

One of the many blessings of OPACY. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

$8.  Plenty of parking. The front lots are $10 but that is for season holders. Every once and awhile I have seen them let people in there but rarely. 

That’s what I remembered but I was getting different info online. Thanks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, waroriole said:

That’s what I remembered but I was getting different info online. Thanks. 

If you're going to tomorrow's game, metered street parking should be free since it's Sunday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For Saturday and Sunday games, you will probably be parking next to M&T Bank Stadium for $10.

The rest of the time, you can park in the lots under the bridge for $10. If you go to the small annex lot, across from Lot A just before Russell Street, early enough, you can park there for $10 too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A thing to check on is the church parking lot just up from the K/L parking on Hamburg.  Someone there to watch the car and a small enough lot to watch easily.  Price is usually the same as Oriole lots but no reservation needed.  End up walking two blocks more than from K/L.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

I think parking at the Horseshoe is still free for Oriole games but a little bit of a walk 

My suggestion is to always park at horseshoe casino, then take a $5 uber/lyft there and back to the stadium. You get door to door service, your car is safe, and you don’t have to walk anywhere at night. 

But that’s my move...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, waroriole said:

That’s what I remembered but I was getting different info online. Thanks. 

No problem. I’m not sure if they only sell online parking day of game or not. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

o

 

I have always parked for free in Little italy, and made the 15-minute walk to and from the stadium (straight down Pratt Street) to watch the games ........ and if the game is at all crowded, you will probably get back to wherever you are going to at about the same time as if you were parked at the stadium, because you won't be dealing with the thousands of cars which are all leaving OPACY right after the game.

 

o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • I don't imagine Mason Williams will be able to play the next few days so we will probably get to see more of Hays on this homestand.
    • From a purely impersonal point of view, I agree with you.    But in the real world, guys who have been with the club most of the year and have made some contributions aren’t going to be completely cut off.    They’ll get tossed a bone here and there.     And yes, I realize that one can debate whether Smith or Wilkerson  “made some contributions.”    
    • It was intended as a wisecrack.    The mores of 1976 weren’t the same as today.    Believe me, Weaver said a lot worse.     As to Cuellar, I understand Weaver made the remark after Cuellar complained about not getting enough starts in 1976, a year in which he went 4-13 with a 4.96 ERA (66 ERA+).    To me it was just Weaver’s colorful way of saying that he felt he’d given Cuellar plenty of chances that year.    Not a comment on Cuellar’s overall performance during his career.    And my point in quoting Weaver was that Cuellar got a lot more chances that year than a pitcher without his track record would have gotten.     Even Earl Weaver believed that a guy who had earned it over a long period of time deserved some rope.   Buck was far from alone in that regard.   
    • They have to many players on the team.  I think they should be evaluating the guys who need evaluating.  I think we can close the book on Smith and Wilkerson.
    • I would keep Villar.  He is a good major league player.  We have too few of them to give them away.
    • It was a cheap shot on his first wife as well.
    • I haven't done the full 40-man eval but I'd protect him over the other guys you listed. Would the plus curve and the slider that is more slurrvy, I think he's got a pretty good chance of being a solid bullpen arm. From July to the end of the year batters slashed .147/.284/.206/.490 off him with a 0.47 ERA over 19.1 IP with 22 Ks and 11 BBs. Agreed the fastball command needs to tighten up a bit but at 93-95, it has enough on it to keep guys honest even when he not commanding as well.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...