Jump to content
Greg Pappas

O's 2020 MLB Draft Chat: Picking #2/30/39/74

Recommended Posts

Is there any early favorites to go number 1? I've seen Spencer Torkelson, but apparently he's another 1B type. How does he compare to Vaughn?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Spl51 said:

Is there any early favorites to go number 1? I've seen Spencer Torkelson, but apparently he's another 1B type. How does he compare to Vaughn?

Naturally it's way early, but Fangraphs has a 2020 Top Prospects List.

Quote

1  Emerson Hancock       RHP       21.0      6' 4"/200            R/R              Georgia             

2  Patrick Bailey               C            21.0      6' 2"/192            S/R              North Carolina State                   

3  Spencer Torkelson     1B          20.8      6' 1"/205            R/R              Arizona State                  

4  Cole Wilcox                 RHP       20.9      6' 5"/220            R/R              Georgia             

5  Tanner Burns               RHP       21.4      6' 0"/215            R/R              Auburn              

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of really good college arms next year.

In addition to those guys there is Asa Lacy, JT Ginn, Reid Detmers, Tommy Mace, and Garrett Crochet(personal favorite other than Hancock who is just a monster).

Also there are a couple SEC shortstops named Martin who could be risers. Austin Martin of Vandy whose best tool is hit and Casey Martin of Arkansas who is an 80 runner with sneaky power.

Freddy Zamora of Miami is also worth following, SS, slick fielder, really improved at the plate, another step would put him in the 1-1 debate.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

Lots of really good college arms next year.

In addition to those guys there is Asa Lacy, JT Ginn, Reid Detmers, Tommy Mace, and Garrett Crochet(personal favorite other than Hancock who is just a monster).

Also there are a couple SEC shortstops named Martin who could be risers. Austin Martin of Vandy whose best tool is hit and Casey Martin of Arkansas who is an 80 runner with sneaky power.

Freddy Zamora of Miami is also worth following, SS, slick fielder, really improved at the plate, another step would put him in the 1-1 debate.

Miami is the college team I root for, so I watched quite a bit of them this year, and Zamora took a step up with the bat but a step back with the glove, he led the team in errors this year. 

I don't claim to be a scout so I'm not debating him being in the discussion, Im just surprised that Toral isn't the more talked about guy, he has big power. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, baltimoreO's22 said:

Miami is the college team I root for, so I watched quite a bit of them this year, and Zamora took a step up with the bat but a step back with the glove, he led the team in errors this year. 

I don't claim to be a scout so I'm not debating him being in the discussion, Im just surprised that Toral isn't the more talked about guy, he has big power. 

He definitely does have big pop, it’s just a hard path for a 1B into the first round, especially one who strikes out a bunch. (His career K rate is 3x as much as 2019 early first round 1B Andrew Vaughn)

Zamora isn’t the most consistent defender, but honestly that’s only a part of what teams look for, he has the range and arm to stick and potentially be above average there. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Luke-OH In regards to the #MLBDraft, the team with the worst record at season's end gets the first pick in the following draft, BUT how is worst record defined? Is it by Winning % (as I suspect) or by Games Back of the Overall League leader? 

I'm asking because of the current situation.  The Marlins have a .311 Winning %, and the O's a .312 Winning %, but we are 1/2 game farther behind the overall league leading Astros. I feel like I've looked this up before, but can't recall for sure. LOL!

Quote

PICK  TEAM    RECORD  WIN%  GB    
1     Miami           14-31    .311    0.5    
2     Baltimore     15-33    .312     --    

   

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

@Luke-OH In regards to the #MLBDraft, the team with the worst record at season's end gets the first pick in the following draft, BUT how is worst record defined? Is it by Winning % (as I suspect) or by Games Back of the Overall League leader? 

I'm asking because of the current situation.  The Marlins have a .311 Winning %, and the O's a .312 Winning %, but we are 1/2 game farther behind the overall league leading Astros. I feel like I've looked this up before, but can't recall for sure. LOL!

 

Winning percentage.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Updated after today's (Thursday 5/23/19) games: 

Quote

PICK  TEAM    RECORD  WIN%  GB    
1     Orioles        15-35     .300     ----    
2     Marlins       16-31     .340    2.5   
3     Royals        17-32     .347    2.5

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Tyler Spencer over does it a bit, but it's pretty restrained by his standards. It is a serious cover.  
    • I think that if you can't convince ownership to eat the Webb and Matuez contracts that yes, it 100% falls on you.  He signed them, neither one of them were needed and he had to trade away draft picks to get shed of their contracts. That is 100% on Dan.
    • I am very happy Elias is here. I think he was the right man for the job and we are in a good place.  Keep in mind though Brian Graham who was a Buck guy, ran the minor leagues. He wasn’t even hired by Dan.  I think our player development is in a much better place now. Odds are they would not have been as good with Dan. That said it was never his show to run. It was a mess.  
    • What he is suppose to say? The owner wanted me to cut salary and this is only way to acccomplish that? Of course he is going to downplay it.  
    • Its an interesting list but I wonder how many were developed well under Duquette.  The knock on Dan is not the drafting but the development.   Mancini developed under Dan.  Brady gets some credit for working with Trey.  Hader was traded early so not developed with the O's.  Guasman may have been rushed.  Could have been better than he was with the O's. Means wasn't much of a prospect under Dan.  It was Holt that helped him with the change which helped him have a good year in 2019.  They say you can't mess up the good ones but Dan certainly tried. Keeping Mouncastle at SS/3B for too long.    Scott is coming around under Elias' team. I like Dan and love the team he built in a short time after he joined the O's.  But player development of minor leaguers was not his strong suit.   He had a knack for acquiring players at the major league level and making a team into a winner.  And that is not a bad thing.
    • We drafted Donnie Hart? I thought we got him from Ny. Meanwhile, quite a trip down memory lane. Yes, overall not a bad job. Meanwhile, it’s also worth mentioning that Buck/ Dan didn’t consider Yaz worth even a cup of coffee on one of history’s worst teams, and he now has the leading WAR on the Giants, and Walker  was a gift for the D-Backs. That’s ok, though. It will be interesting to see what the others add to the list.
    • Of course they were about money, but that was slightly different. Matusz and Webb were,“Give us a token non-prospect and we’ll give you a draft pick...oh, and a declining player with a small salary, whom you can release the next day.” I think the Webb pick was somewhere in the 70s, but the Matusz pick was ~20 picks sooner. I don’t remember Dans exact comments about the value of the picks, but they were dismissive. At a time when we’d lost several picks because of signing QA guys, those picks had value.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...