Jump to content
jgjbanker

Mancini Trade Package

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, Cy Bundy said:

giphy.gif

Tyler White. Sorry. Lol. That's who I meant. Travis Shaw is on my fantasy baseball team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, nate22 said:

Tyler White. Sorry. Lol. That's who I meant. Travis Shaw is on my fantasy baseball team.

Ha, I figured, Mancini is a better hitter than the guys they DH, but he’s not enough of an upgrade to warrant a trade I wouldn’t think - particularly not when they have a DH raking in AAA & another elite bat waiting in Kyle Tucker. Yordan Alvarez is a moose.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/25/2019 at 12:40 AM, Philip said:

Sure, a lot of teams would rather have smoak Because he offers good defense, good offense, he’s in the last year of his deal and would be very very cheap. Mancini is limited, but he has four more years of control and will probably be cheap for most of them, So a lot of teams would rather have Smoak. Neither player would bring back much, but Smoak would cost less.

Maybe teams would prefer to pay a lower price for Smoak, but I doubt there are any teams that would "rather have Smoak." If price tag wasn't a concern all 29 other teams would prefer Mancini IMO largely due to the option value associated with 3.5 eyars of control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/24/2019 at 8:33 PM, tntoriole said:

If Cleveland wants to get a bat and decides to buy if they stay in touch with the Twins over the next month and Trey heats up again, Mancini could play 1b or Dh back and forth with Santana or replace Luplow in right.

He could easily return 3 prospects, like George Valera , Luis Oveido, Ethan Hankins  18yrs, 20 yrs, 19 years... imho. 

 

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2019?list=cle

 

 

 

This is a complete message board trade proposal, but I would love it.  Send the Indians Mancini and Smith Jr. in exchange for Jake Bauers, one or two of their back-end top-10 prospect arms (Oviedo, Hankins, Hentges, Torres) and one or two lottery ticket type guys in A ball.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/25/2019 at 2:34 PM, tntoriole said:

None of these I mentiioned are on any Top 100 lists that I can find and I would see them as second tier, developmental and thus higher risk prospects by any objective assessment.  I would not be surprised at all if this happened...IF Trey doesn’t slump between now and then and IF the Indians are  close to the Twins and become buyers.  In fact, it may be a higher return, imho. 

Fangraphs has articles about prospect valuation, and how it plays into trades:

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/an-update-to-prospect-valuation/

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/putting-a-dollar-value-on-prospects-outside-the-top-100/

Using MLB Pipeline’s rankings Valera is a 50, Oviedo is a 50, and Hankins is a 50. That’s probably too high. Fangraphs has Valera as a 50, Oviedo as a 45, and Hankins as a 40+. While I don’t think this is necessarily the gospel, Fangraphs says that a 50 position player is worth $28 million, a 45 pitcher is worth $4 million, and a 40+ pitcher is worth $3 million. Thus, Cleveland would probably want at least $35 million in surplus value for that package. Mancini was worth 1.7 fWAR in 2017 and -.2 fWAR in 2018. This year he has been worth 1.3 fWAR so far. If Mancini settles in at 2 wins per year, and he’s paid about $20 million over the next 3 years, he will have surplus value of only $15 million. That’s one reason why I think a trade like this is unlikely.

That being said I enjoy watching Trey play. I also hope he can bring a package like this to the team and think that despite his limitations he does have some value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick look, but here’s where I think Mancini could be a fit,

TB - 1B (Choi)

Clev - COF/1B/DH

Oak - COF

After that, I don’t know if there is really a market.  Oak and TB are usually never “buyers”.  Clev will likely roll with what they have.  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Sydnor said:

Fangraphs has articles about prospect valuation, and how it plays into trades:

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/an-update-to-prospect-valuation/

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/putting-a-dollar-value-on-prospects-outside-the-top-100/

Using MLB Pipeline’s rankings Valera is a 50, Oviedo is a 50, and Hankins is a 50. That’s probably too high. Fangraphs has Valera as a 50, Oviedo as a 45, and Hankins as a 40+. While I don’t think this is necessarily the gospel, Fangraphs says that a 50 position player is worth $28 million, a 45 pitcher is worth $4 million, and a 40+ pitcher is worth $3 million. Thus, Cleveland would probably want at least $35 million in surplus value for that package. Mancini was worth 1.7 fWAR in 2017 and -.2 fWAR in 2018. This year he has been worth 1.3 fWAR so far. If Mancini settles in at 2 wins per year, and he’s paid about $20 million over the next 3 years, he will have surplus value of only $15 million. That’s one reason why I think a trade like this is unlikely.

That being said I enjoy watching Trey play. I also hope he can bring a package like this to the team and think that despite his limitations he does have some value.

These valuations don't sufficiently factor in the risk issues involved with the developmental risks of an 18 year old, a 19 year old and a 20 year old versus a proven major league performer, imho.   In fact all three prospects could not even make the major leagues and that is not an  unlikely outcome much less any of them reaching the level of achievement of even a 2 wins a year contribution.   This is part of my problem with the current model of directly translating dollar value based on projections in the lowest age ranges of developmental prospects.  Not only do I think it is inaccurate, it is worse than tea leaves, imho.   I hope ME's analytics are more advanced. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cleveland makes the most sense they need some offense are still trying to win but also don't want to add payroll.  That keeps them away from the older rental guys that would increase their payroll.  They also have a really deep farm system that have a few guys that are young and not needed to be added to our 40 man roster, however they probally don't want to give up all guys just brought in as this was a big part of their strong system with the people they signed in the international signing period.  This would also help keep their payroll down in the future so i doubt they want to give up 2 or 3 super young and talanted guys.  I would look more at a 1 or 2 guys that are very young and then some depth in our upper affiliates.  

Mancini for 

SS Yu Chang  He has some upside but has been blocked by Lindor but could start at SS or 2nd for us.  He has some pop but also some swing and miss in the swing.  I expect Villar to be traded at some point and i don't see Martin as a major league SS in the future as the bat doesn't look like it will play.  We are thin up the middle and Chang could help fill some of that.

RHP Luis Oviedo   He is a young starter that got a nice singing bonus in the international signing period.  He is a high upside high risk type that is in the lower minors and a few years away.

RHP Carlos Vargas  He is another young international signing with a big arm and some high upside and high risk.  Another guy a few years away that we can keep in the minors awhile and hopefully build him up.

RHP  Aaron Civale  He is a starter in double this year and doing decent after an injury to start the year.  He came on late as a college and the cape cod.  He was then drafted in the third round in 2016 and has progressed pretty well.  Why i like him is he is a high spin guy which is something Elias has seemed to like in the Astros organization.  

This would give us one guy that is major league ready a starter that is not a high upside guy but also a low floor along with two lottery tickets of guys that are high upside high risk.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Just a quick look, but here’s where I think Mancini could be a fit,

TB - 1B (Choi)

Clev - COF/1B/DH

Oak - COF

After that, I don’t know if there is really a market.  Oak and TB are usually never “buyers”.  Clev will likely roll with what they have.  

 

 

So I think there are a number of issues with the approach of looking for immediate need in starting line ups.  First obviously, it doesnt account for injuries.  Second, it doesnt account for the fact that playoff teams are looking for depth.  Third, it doesnt account for the long term value of Mancini, the control a team has.

Finally, and I can't stress this enough, is that it is foolish to assume that teams trading to compete act rationally, act with metrics in mind at all times, and act with their best long term interests in mind.  I think teams do more of this but the playoffs is a cruel and tantalizing drug.  

TB.  While maybe an immediate offensive upgrade could be had, Choi provides plus OBP and Defense.  Long term Nate Lowe looks ready to take over.

Cle.  Obviously there are a number of fits here. Mancini looks like a more complete offensive version of Jake Bauers.  Their high K staff could discount the negative of Mancinis defense.  They need the offense.

Oak.  I would counter the argument that Oakland doesnt trade.  They do particularly when they are in it.  They are a wildcard as they churn players and had a similar player in Ryon Healy on the roster a few years ago.  I would think injury would be necessary though. 

Sea.  You can never discount Sea churning through players.  They are also an injury prone team.  They now have the similarly mentioned Healy but could be interested because well DiPoto.

Phi.  I wouldnt discount the Phillies trying to add to what is a very weak bench.  Any injury at all could create a great need here.

NYM.  Have a gaping hole in LF.  Need offense and do stupid things.  Regularly.

SD.  The Padres are currently depending on some very young hitters in the OF.  If they need offense and think they have a shot a more proven hitter like Mancini could be appealing.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Sydnor said:

Fangraphs has articles about prospect valuation, and how it plays into trades:

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/an-update-to-prospect-valuation/

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/putting-a-dollar-value-on-prospects-outside-the-top-100/

Using MLB Pipeline’s rankings Valera is a 50, Oviedo is a 50, and Hankins is a 50. That’s probably too high. Fangraphs has Valera as a 50, Oviedo as a 45, and Hankins as a 40+. While I don’t think this is necessarily the gospel, Fangraphs says that a 50 position player is worth $28 million, a 45 pitcher is worth $4 million, and a 40+ pitcher is worth $3 million. Thus, Cleveland would probably want at least $35 million in surplus value for that package. Mancini was worth 1.7 fWAR in 2017 and -.2 fWAR in 2018. This year he has been worth 1.3 fWAR so far. If Mancini settles in at 2 wins per year, and he’s paid about $20 million over the next 3 years, he will have surplus value of only $15 million. That’s one reason why I think a trade like this is unlikely.

That being said I enjoy watching Trey play. I also hope he can bring a package like this to the team and think that despite his limitations he does have some value.

That’s a very good comment, but the subsequent one regarding such valuations of very young players is valid.

also we have no idea how a given team values it’s own players. Given information, people interpret it differently.

So if we identify a team that wants/can use Mancini, find out where their own farm is deepest and look for the surplus there. It’s most likely we could get something reasonable from that surplus.

Mancini has value, and is probably more valuable to us as future players than as current production, but still doubtful he would return anything significant. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Camden_yardbird said:

So I think there are a number of issues with the approach of looking for immediate need in starting line ups.  First obviously, it doesnt account for injuries.  Second, it doesnt account for the fact that playoff teams are looking for depth.  Third, it doesnt account for the long term value of Mancini, the control a team has.

Finally, and I can't stress this enough, is that it is foolish to assume that teams trading to compete act rationally, act with metrics in mind at all times, and act with their best long term interests in mind.  I think teams do more of this but the playoffs is a cruel and tantalizing drug.  

TB.  While maybe an immediate offensive upgrade could be had, Choi provides plus OBP and Defense.  Long term Nate Lowe looks ready to take over.

Cle.  Obviously there are a number of fits here. Mancini looks like a more complete offensive version of Jake Bauers.  Their high K staff could discount the negative of Mancinis defense.  They need the offense.

Oak.  I would counter the argument that Oakland doesnt trade.  They do particularly when they are in it.  They are a wildcard as they churn players and had a similar player in Ryon Healy on the roster a few years ago.  I would think injury would be necessary though. 

Sea.  You can never discount Sea churning through players.  They are also an injury prone team.  They now have the similarly mentioned Healy but could be interested because well DiPoto.

Phi.  I wouldnt discount the Phillies trying to add to what is a very weak bench.  Any injury at all could create a great need here.

NYM.  Have a gaping hole in LF.  Need offense and do stupid things.  Regularly.

SD.  The Padres are currently depending on some very young hitters in the OF.  If they need offense and think they have a shot a more proven hitter like Mancini could be appealing.

 

The Mets are toast, yes they do dumb stuff, so don’t discount them, but I don’t think they can seriously contend and they know it. Much more likely they fold their tents and trade Edwin Diaz.

The Mariners started out historically great. They opened the season with homeruns in 15 or 18 consecutive games, but boy have they come back to Earth. They also have to make it through the Rangers, and they have to catch the Rays, Red Sox/Yankees, and Maybe Cleveland too. Plus they already have a solid DH/1B in Dan Vogelbach, who is basically a clone of Mancini but younger, better on D, and with two additional years of control.Not gonna happen.

I don’t think Oakland wants a one-dimensional player, and Beane is a shrewd trader.

SD is a possibility but they need pitching.

interesting times ahead...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

I've said it before..Ill say it again. KEEP MANCINI!!!

I'll say it again.  You also wanted us to keep Davis and Trumbo.

For that one poster, I know Roy isn't a decision maker for the team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

I've said it before..Ill say it again. KEEP MANCINI!!!

I interpret this post as advocating a trade of Mountcastle. I kid, sort of. It's hard to have too many one-dimensional guys on the team. Maybe Mountcastle does move to left and is effective. That would be the best case scenario.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LookinUp said:

I interpret this post as advocating a trade of Mountcastle. I kid, sort of. It's hard to have too many one-dimensional guys on the team. Maybe Mountcastle does move to left and is effective. That would be the best case scenario.

Naw, just put surplus in the outfield.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • I'm not particularly vouching for COC's entire list as it would differ from mine. I was just saying that Tate is the most important to keep from his list and Wilkerson is DFA fodder IMO.  Davis is Davis, he's completely useless as a MLB player at this point but he will probably hang around because of the obvious reason.  Wynns, yes Elias wants catching depth, but Wynns is utterly replaceable from a baseball talent standpoint. He's pretty equivalent to the standard waiver wire catcher.
    • Two things that have been talked about needing attention in the minors are distances between venues within a league (i.e. travel burden on players) and pay.  As someone already mentioned, fewer clubs = fewer players, possibly making it more feasible to consider pay increases for those remaining. This makes sense to me, and their current pay situation really does need to be addressed.  As for distances, many of those on the list of 42 are clearly being eliminated because of their distance from other clubs. As someone else already mentioned, remaining venues will probably be reassigned, not only to a different MLB affiliation but also perhaps a different level and thereby a different league. With some doing, a better geographic alignment within leagues might ultimately be possible. Shortening the grueling bus-ride distances may take away a traditional rite of passage, but could really assist in the health of the players that teams are investing so much in.  About Frederick? Perhaps their ability to draw decent attendance means they're good candidates for success as an independent league venue. Otherwise, no idea. Would really like to know the thinking behind eliminating them. My hope is that since the plan was initiated by Luhnow and quickly adopted by Stearns and Elias (see below), its focus really was on improving the development process, not just another plan to cut ownership costs -- naive as that might seem.  More info: https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/mlb/rob-manfreds-plan-to-destroy-minor-league-baseball/ar-BBWRVGV   
    • How was Blier injured last season? He found magic, had core surgery, has not shown magic to me since. I say he is expensive for what he is. 
    • Here is the guys on the veterans ballot: I would like to see Tommy John and Lou Whitaker to get in.  To make this Oriole related: Does Dwight Evans go in as an Oriole if he makes it 😀   1 y Lou Whitaker 93 2 y Dwight Evans 70 3 y Tommy John 112 4 y Dale Murphy 116 5 y Ted Simmons 125 6 y Thurman Munson 90 7 y Don Mattingly 134 8 y Dave Parker 125 9 y Steve Garvey 131    
    • In my view: Hess?  Is being converted to the pen.   He has a 3.00 ERA, 225 avg and a 1.08 WHIP in 24 IP at Norfolk.   He could be DFA'd if Elias finds someone better.  Has option. Smith?  I think he could go in the next day or so but at any rate I don't think he makes it through the off season without being DFA'd. Has option Wynns sounds like Elias wants to keep him for now.  If Elias finds someone better as you suggest he could go.  Has option. Mullins probably tries to re-establish himself at AAA.   Depends on how he does has to how long he stays.  Could be a 4th OFer with the ability to back on CF/LF. Has option. O's need good relievers.   Bleier has been good when healthy.   He was injured early last season but did better toward the end of the season.  I think he stays for now.  Doesn't have much trade value right now.  Has option. Kline has a good arm, is cheap and I think he may start the year at AAA unless he does great in ST.   I don't think they give up in his arm yet. Has option Phillips is on the bubble.  Has done what he need to do at AAA but hasn't had success with the O's.   Whether he stay depend on who either Elias brings on.  Has option. Yes, Davis will not be cut.  Elias as expressed support for him in view of his contract. I believe there is a low chance that the O's make a trade prior to setting the roster for the Rule 5 draft.    
    • You have to have played in 10 different seasons and make it past the screening committee.  
    • Google ten-cent beer night… That was quite a game.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...