Jump to content
Greg Pappas

An Early Look at the 2020 Draft's Top Prospects

Recommended Posts

It's VERY early, but folks (like me) are already looking ahead to what will likely be a Top 3 draft choice in the 2020 MLB Draft.
So, I'll be providing links to lists or articles that feature the top prospects. Be sure to note the dates given in some of the links, as those articles will become outdated as time passes.  Fangraphs' link is updated periodically.

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just curious, how did the projected top 10 for 2019 look at this time last year?    I remember Witt was a very hot topic.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Just curious, how did the projected top 10 for 2019 look at this time last year?    I remember Witt was a very hot topic.   

Here’s a mock draft from last June 6 that had Logan Davidson going no. 1 and Adley Rutschman going 24.   https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2779712-2019-mlb-mock-draft-early-predictions-for-top-1st-round-baseball-prospects.amp.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Just curious, how did the projected top 10 for 2019 look at this time last year?    I remember Witt was a very hot topic.   

At this point last year, 2080 posted this article: https://2080baseball.com/2018/06/mlb-draft-ten-names-for-2019/

Half of their early Top Ten went in the first round, though Witt Jr was the consensus early favorite. I recall you, I, and others warning folks that this is just an early look and these rankings and list will likely change.  Many talked about Witt in the early going as if it was a foregone conclusion he'd be our pick, but we know how that turned out. Now I've seen Blaze Jordan & Emerson Hancock being mentioned to us, but again caution folks to recognize early lists for what they are... possibilities and speculation. The truly relevant info will come next May+.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Greg Pappas said:

At this point last year, 2080 posted this article: https://2080baseball.com/2018/06/mlb-draft-ten-names-for-2019/

Half of their early Top Ten went in the first round, though Witt Jr was the consensus early favorite. I recall you, I, and others warning folks that this is just an early look and these rankings and list will likely change.  Many talked about Witt in the early going as if it was a foregone conclusion he'd be our pick, but we know how that turned out. Now I've seen Blaze Jordan & Emerson Hancock being mentioned to us, but again caution folks to recognize early lists for what they are... possibilities and speculation.

Luke isn’t that high on Blaze Jordan.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

I know, but Cy Bundy is. :)

That’s just because of the unlimited possibilities for nicknames.    

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I capitalized and bolded "very" in the OP to signify the low relevance of this early info.  By next May forward the top prospects will begin to come into focus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, joelala said:

potentially lots of pitching next year, it seems.

That would be great. 
If I were to choose which position I'd like the top couple of prospects to play, it'd be pitcher/starter.
We have some top quality pitching prospects on the way, but we need more. 
A ToR hurler would be an incredible get, especially a collegian that would have an ETA around the same time as our other top guys. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Just curious, how did the projected top 10 for 2019 look at this time last year?    I remember Witt was a very hot topic.   

Immediately after last year's draft, Jonathan Mayo had Witt first and Rutschman second in his top 10. He also got three more of the top 10.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really like the sounds of the Fangraph's write up on Hancock: Sits 92-96 with a plus change up. We're seeing the effectiveness of a big time change up. 

3 hours ago, Greg Pappas said:

That would be great. 
If I were to choose which position I'd like the top couple of prospects to play, it'd be pitcher/starter.
We have some top quality pitching prospects on the way, but we need more. 
A ToR hurler would be an incredible get, especially a collegian that would have an ETA around the same time as our other top guys. 

Elias will say he wants best player available, and I completely support that rationale, but it would be great if that BPA is also someone who can be reaching OPACY within a season or so of Hall, GrayRod and Rutschman. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, xian4 said:

Let's hope that the consensus No 1 pick isn't another catcher ...

How did not picking Posey work out?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

How did not picking Posey work out?

Best available, best available, best available, best available.........

Even if it is another great catcher, some fall through and you can move people around.  Posey was an athlete, plain and simple.  That was the problem with prior drafts.  They drafted for position.  If you draft for position, you are possibly taking someone not as good.  Give me 10 Buster Poseys and I will show you 5 that turn out because of various reasons, a couple that can change positions and a couple that can be traded for positions of need.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Holt and Akin were tonight's guests. Roch before the interview segments on crowded OF I did notice the tone of certainty in his banter about Santander going at trade deadline. Holt describing Valdez said it is as simple as he "does what he's good at a bunch", which reminded me of Earl's book and his observation almost nobody is good at everything.   I think I heard him ruling out 6-man rotation when he got that question, saying the extra rest too disruptive to pitcher's rhythms.  I am guessing we will more skip starts, or shorten seasons to manage that. Akin gave a "trust the process" quote about marching orders from Holt at AAA to use sliders and change-ups when normally he wouldn't, even if walks ensued.   He said he and DL Hall talk all the time.   Asked about the 60 to 162 part of this year's challenge, he shared a bit from a conversation with Kremer, where Kremer said he simulated 50-60 innings between Spring Training 1 and Spring Training 2, and that he also was generally working like that last April/May/June too.
    • You left out Sceroler and Wells. And Mattson too for that matter.
    • I don't know Frobby.  I am guessing the performance of the NRIs is irrelevant.   I think they have a plan for Lowther, Wells, and Baumann.  I dont know exacrly what it is, and wouldn't be surprised if it was more conservative than a lot of us want. But I don't think it will be changed by what the NRIs do in the spring.  If The Plan is for any of the 3 guys to be here at the start or early in the season, they will be here.  If, more likely, The Plan is to slow play them, then I think they will be slow played.  And if all the MRI possibilities look awful, we'll either pick up someone on waivers or just go with the slightly less awful of the NRIs and suffer.  I don't think the development of Zac Lowther will be affected in any way by whether Felix Hernandez has totally lost it or if he still has something left   
    • o   CYNTHIA LENNON   o
    • This guy is claiming they are at #25 & #65 ...In a later tweet he specifically mentions not getting credit for the tweet when its announced. I dont know him or anything about him so take it for what its worth! I'd be happy with this but really happy if somebody else steps up and they have to up it to #25 and #45        
    • They don't need rosters spots.  They might earn roster spots.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...