Jump to content
interloper

What's with the Yusniel regression?

Recommended Posts

In 220 AB, he was OPSing .905 in AA Tulsa before the trade. Since then?

.732 in 2018 at Bowie

.621 in 2019 so far at Bowie

Just a development hiccup for him or what? Clearly a ton of talent that was showcased this past ST. I find this one of the more bizarre developments in our minors this year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Diaz and McKenna have been by far the biggest disappointments as far as position players in our system go. 

Both have inexplicably regressed.  Diaz had a .900 OPS in the Texas League before coming over last season.  Perhaps it's a more favorable hitting environment there. 

Also concerning, is the lack of power. Only 1 HR in 93 at bats this season.  Some wanted him on the big league roster to start this season, but he's clearly still far away from making any kind of impact in Baltimore. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, interloper said:

In 220 AB, he was OPSing .905 in AA Tulsa before the trade. Since then?

.732 in 2018 at Bowie

.621 in 2019 so far at Bowie

Just a development hiccup for him or what? Clearly a ton of talent that was showcased this past ST. I find this one of the more bizarre developments in our minors this year. 

I believe I may have posted this at the time of the trade, but not everyone was sold on Diaz at the time of the trade. For example, in Baseball America’s article discussing the Machado trade, one scout said as follows:

"The Dodgers sold high on a risky guy they don’t believe heavily in,’ said a third scout. "Having said that, I didn’t expect a big package. Rentals don’t command big packages in the game these days.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.baseballamerica.com/stories/how-scouts-front-office-personnel-viewed-the-machado-trade/%3famphtml

I’m hopeful that Diaz turns it around and, with his injuries, I have no idea what his true talent level is, but I’m concerned that he might not be the player that we were hoping to receive in a Machado trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not ready to make too big a deal over this.    Diaz had a .673 May last year, so it’s not like he was hitting non-stop in Tulsa.    His injury disrupted this season, so hopefully he’ll heat up as he did at times last year.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he got vastly overrated - in part because of a big Futures Game performance - and was never really a legit big-time prospect, so I'm not really surprised he hasn't excelled this season.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

I think he got vastly overrated - in part because of a big Futures Game performance - and was never really a legit big-time prospect, so I'm not really surprised he hasn't excelled this season.  

I think anytime a team spend that large an amount of money on a player he becomes a legit big-time prospect until proven otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think anytime a team spend that large an amount of money on a player he becomes a legit big-time prospect until proven otherwise.

No, he's gotta prove it, and he never has. He's gotta actually do something to be legit.  He's been playing pro baseball since 2016, and the only time he really excelled was about 200 or 300 at bats in the Texas League when he OPS'd barely about .900.  He's a good prospect but hardly anything to get excited about, imo.       

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Remember: Diaz has dealt with an injury almost all season. Last year, Hays dealt with one all year and people gave him the benefit of the doubt. 

Hays required postseason surgery, and actually had a couple of different injuries.   Was Diaz already hurt before the day he went on the IL?    Is he still hampered by the injury?    I have no idea.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

No, he's gotta prove it, and he never has. He's gotta actually do something to be legit.  He's been playing pro baseball since 2016, and the only time he really excelled was about 200 or 300 at bats in the Texas League when he OPS'd barely about .900.  He's a good prospect but hardly anything to get excited about, imo.       

 

 

So Rutschman isn't a big time prospect yet?  OK, I don't agree with your definition but OK.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, interloper said:

In 220 AB, he was OPSing .905 in AA Tulsa before the trade. Since then?

.732 in 2018 at Bowie

.621 in 2019 so far at Bowie

Just a development hiccup for him or what? Clearly a ton of talent that was showcased this past ST. I find this one of the more bizarre developments in our minors this year. 

Injury. Just like the Hays regression. Or the Harvey regression. Or the Bundy regression.Or the Tate regression. Injury. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Hays required postseason surgery, and actually had a couple of different injuries.   Was Diaz already hurt before the day he went on the IL?    Is he still hampered by the injury?    I have no idea.   

Diaz was good in Spring Training. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, weams said:

Injury. Just like the Hays regression. Or the Harvey regression. Or the Bundy regression.Or the Tate regression. Injury. 

Tate hasn't been good since he was drafted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, atomic said:

He only had a .787 OPS at High A.  Maybe he just isn't that good. Should have taken the Comp pick. 

The Orioles didn't handle the situation well but even they knew to trade Manny. You realize how much a crapshoot the draft is right? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Is that true? I remember that being part of the negotiations but I dont think it ended up being part of the deal since MLB unilaterally set the number of games. MLBTR seems to think there are still qualifying offers and so does Twitter, based on my searching. Mets beat writer seems to think a qualifying offer is still an option and nobody is correcting her, and since she is a woman on the internet writing about sports, I imagine she would be corrected by a million dudes if she was wrong.
    • I don’t disagree with anything you said, and I’m grateful you said it. Everyone needs a designated driver. But lemme play devil’s advocate for a moment. This is 60 games. ~12 starts instead of 30. 60 starters instead of 162, and several guys who can start a time or two and not ruin our lives. One trait of greatness is consistency. Over 60, that is less important than over 162. Our starters and our pen appear much superior to the last couple years. Not enough to matter in 162 because the long season takes a toll, And quality-or lack thereof- finds its level, but in 60 games? Sure. And remember the short season doesn’t help the best, because the best doesn’t need the benefits a short season offers. The defense is much better too, unless Nunez is playing third, anyway. so yes I agree with you, but it’s not out of the question.  
    • This was a nice read.  And that's not sarcasm.
    • No qualifying offers this season.
    • If Stroman gets a qualifying offer he would cost the O's their third pick (either the comp pick after round 2 or, if that pick is traded, their third round pick). Jake Odorizzi got a QO this off-season at the same age as Stroman with a less successful career to date. I think it is quite likely that Stroman gets one too.
    • I appreciate Wildcards's enthusiasm and optimism. This season is such a wildcard because of all the variables that really anything could happen and I wouldn't be overly surprised. Saying that, there is no reality where this is the beginning of a sustainable winning core.  There is just as much of a chance of this team losing ten straight games as they do of keep playing .500 ball the rest of this season.  As Drungo has point out, there are some guys who have started out this season way above their carer norms. Even if you believe Severino, Ruiz, Alberto and Nunez are breaking out as they enter their primes, does anyone think Cobb, Milone and Wojo are going to keep pitching to their current ERAs? Cobb maybe since it seems his splitter has come back, but I'm not buying long term sustainability on Milone and Hyde has used Wojo right but not letting him go more than twice through an order. 
    • What does that mean? What's the cost of Wildcard's optimism? Also, I don't think what I said constituted being negative.  That's an honest appraisal of the team.    Not much of what we are seeing looks sustainable.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...