Jump to content
interloper

What's with the Yusniel regression?

Recommended Posts

I think the Dodgers front office is a lot smarter than last year's O's front office and sold high.   I think Diaz has plenty of tools and talent, but he needs to start showing something soon.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, doccat said:

I think the Dodgers front office is a lot smarter than last year's O's front office and sold high.   I think Diaz has plenty of tools and talent, but he needs to start showing something soon.  

Tend to agree.  Our front office could sell him to fans as a 'headliner.'  Dodgers knew he was overrated, and I wouldn't be surprised if Duquette and company knew, too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if it's a nagging injury thing or a guy who doesn't feel like he deserved to have to repeat AA just going through the motions. The tools were on full display in Spring Training so this is pretty confounding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LTO's said:

I'm not sure if it's a nagging injury thing or a guy who doesn't feel like he deserved to have to repeat AA just going through the motions. The tools were on full display in Spring Training so this is pretty confounding.

Sounds like a makeup thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Spl51 said:

Sounds like a makeup thing.

He got many millions of dollars at a very young age. Now he's struggling at AA. I imagine he's going through a tough time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Cy Bundy said:

I didn’t see what substantiated his ranking, but every outlet had him in the top 100, most had him in the top 75. His numbers look consistently ordinary. 

Advanced approach and average or better tools across the board. 

Based on his numbers, it looks like he could just be making a lot of weak contact.  He's continuing to draw walks and not striking out at a terribly high rate.  Perhaps some bad luck?  Hard to say without watching him play.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting stuff here. I kind of also wonder if he's going through the motions down there. He feels like the kind of high energy guy that would do better in the majors than the minors. Or perhaps he's just out of whack mechanically. 

I could see him being a late bloomer. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Spl51 said:

Sounds like a makeup thing.

Impossible to say because Jon doesn't clarify AT ALL. Which is pretty weak for him, honestly. Just going to start rumors that way. He should know better. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/10/2019 at 5:50 PM, 52520Andrew said:

The Orioles didn't handle the situation well but even they knew to trade Manny. You realize how much a crapshoot the draft is right? 

Again... (and yes I know I have said this a lot.) They waited too long. We would likely be way ahead of where we are now had they recognized the progression of the division after the Encarnacion walk off in 2016.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Again... (and yes I know I have said this a lot.) They waited too long. We would likely be way ahead of where we are now had they recognized the progression of the division after the Encarnacion walk off in 2016.

Yeah agreed. That Britton return if they traded him after that year would have been ridiculous. And waiting for Machado to be a rental for a couple months hurt his value

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, interloper said:

Impossible to say because Jon doesn't clarify AT ALL. Which is pretty weak for him, honestly. Just going to start rumors that way. He should know better. 

You can always ask him, as he seems to point out every time someone criticizes him here.   

Edit - he’s been asked to clarify on Twitter by several people, and hasn’t responded.   So, criticize away!

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I don’t disagree with anything you said, and I’m grateful you said it. Everyone needs a designated driver. But lemme play devil’s advocate for a moment. This is 60 games. ~12 starts instead of 30. 60 starters instead of 162, and several guys who can start a time or two and not ruin our lives. One trait of greatness is consistency. Over 60, that is less important than over 162. Our starters and our pen appear much superior to the last couple years. Not enough to matter in 162 because the long season takes a toll, And quality-or lack thereof- finds its level, but in 60 games? Sure. And remember the short season doesn’t help the best, because the best doesn’t need the benefits a short season offers. The defense is much better too, unless Nunez is playing third, anyway. so yes I agree with you, but it’s not out of the question.  
    • This was a nice read.  And that's not sarcasm.
    • No qualifying offers this season.
    • If Stroman gets a qualifying offer he would cost the O's their third pick (either the comp pick after round 2 or, if that pick is traded, their third round pick). Jake Odorizzi got a QO this off-season at the same age as Stroman with a less successful career to date. I think it is quite likely that Stroman gets one too.
    • I appreciate Wildcards's enthusiasm and optimism. This season is such a wildcard because of all the variables that really anything could happen and I wouldn't be overly surprised. Saying that, there is no reality where this is the beginning of a sustainable winning core.  There is just as much of a chance of this team losing ten straight games as they do of keep playing .500 ball the rest of this season.  As Drungo has point out, there are some guys who have started out this season way above their carer norms. Even if you believe Severino, Ruiz, Alberto and Nunez are breaking out as they enter their primes, does anyone think Cobb, Milone and Wojo are going to keep pitching to their current ERAs? Cobb maybe since it seems his splitter has come back, but I'm not buying long term sustainability on Milone and Hyde has used Wojo right but not letting him go more than twice through an order. 
    • What does that mean? What's the cost of Wildcard's optimism? Also, I don't think what I said constituted being negative.  That's an honest appraisal of the team.    Not much of what we are seeing looks sustainable.
    • Yea I don’t know that I buy they will spend what it takes but they have very little money committed long term and that is when you can take advantage of it.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...