Jump to content
Aristotelian

Is This the Bottom?

Recommended Posts

The schedule gets super easy starting a week from Friday.   I still think we'll win over 50 games,.

Now if we continue to lose to KC that could change the outlook.   But before last night (before the 6th inning last night), nothing I had seen since we finished the 16-15 stretch was all that surprising, other than the magnitude of the Yankee beatdowns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

I don't care if we lose out. I want that #1 pick and position ourselves to draft a legitimate #1 ace for the future.

The draft is pretty deep at the top according to ESPN

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/26923672/the-2020-mlb-draft-class-stacked-here-names-know%3fplatform=amp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally for me as a fan, turning on the game just to see if the Orioles were actually still playing and seeing that we had made it into the 12th up by one run and then watching a pitcher I had no idea was even on the roster walk in a run and then give up and walk off grand slam is pretty much rock bottom.    

I know we have a long way to go and one game is meaningless but that was just depressing    

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, murph said:

Personally for me as a fan, turning on the game just to see if the Orioles were actually still playing and seeing that we had made it into the 12th up by one run and then watching a pitcher I had no idea was even on the roster walk in a run and then give up and walk off grand slam is pretty much rock bottom.    

I know we have a long way to go and one game is meaningless but that was just depressing    

 

Think of the poor fans who actually watched Michael Givens blow the save in the bottom of the ninth with the O's up 3-2 with two outs.  We feel for you!  😉 *

*p s  at least it wasn't Hunter Harvey blowing the W  

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely one of the worst losses of the season. https://www.camdenchat.com/2019/9/14/20866368/mlb-scores-orioles-tigers-recap

However, W/L stands at .324, which is still well off the bottom of June. My call in June was that Cashner would win that game and we would end up over .300. Barring disaster, looks like that will happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, murph said:

Personally for me as a fan, turning on the game just to see if the Orioles were actually still playing and seeing that we had made it into the 12th up by one run and then watching a pitcher I had no idea was even on the roster walk in a run and then give up and walk off grand slam is pretty much rock bottom.    

I know we have a long way to go and one game is meaningless but that was just depressing    

 

Well at least no one got injured (I think). That always makes even a ridiculous loss like today even worse. I would wonder how Fry or Eades can hold their heads up in the clubhouse afterwards (especially toward each other!) or look their manager or coach in the eye. Jeesh. It's almost like one of our 1st-draft-pick fetishists hypnotized them from a seat behind home plate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm reminded of the year where we swept a meaningless series against the Yankees on the final weekend, ensuring the Nationals would get the #1 pick to select Harper or Strasburg (can't remember which).

IMO, in some respects this team (more importantly, the franchise) is better than last years team, I don't need to see a significant improvement in wins and losses to feel positive about the future.

I'd really like us to get the #1 pick next year.  I won't be whining about having #2 but I'd still like us to be able to take the first player if a consensus #1 emerges by draft day 2020.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I'm reminded of the year where we swept a meaningless series against the Yankees on the final weekend, ensuring the Nationals would get the #1 pick to select Harper or Strasburg (can't remember which).

IMO, in some respects this team (more importantly, the franchise) is better than last years team, I don't need to see a significant improvement in wins and losses to feel positive about the future.

I'd really like us to get the #1 pick next year.  I won't be whining about having #2 but I'd still like us to be able to take the first player if a consensus #1 emerges by draft day 2020.

I thought that was the 2000 season that sweep happened, because people still hold on to potentially losing out on drafting Mark T.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The last time the orioles swept the Yankees in the final series was 2015.  The sweep was needed to get to .500 Ball

Since 2008 to present the Orioles have only ended the Regular Season playing the Yankees in 2016 and 2015.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, ShaneDawg85 said:

I thought that was the 2000 season that sweep happened, because people still hold on to potentially losing out on drafting Mark T.

You might be right, but I am pretty sure at one point we had a shot at Strasburg/Harper, too.  Maybe we didn't beat the Yankees on the final weekend to lose it but I'm pretty sure we beat a team and screwed ourselves out of one of those two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

You might be right, but I am pretty sure at one point we had a shot at Strasburg/Harper, too.  Maybe we didn't beat the Yankees on the final weekend to lose it but I'm pretty sure we beat a team and screwed ourselves out of one of those two.

Nats lost 103 in 2009 (O's lost 98).  Nats lost 102 in 2008 (O's lost 93).  I don't think the O's have ever picked second overall.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Nats lost 103 in 2009 (O's lost 98).  Nats lost 102 in 2008 (O's lost 93).  I don't think the O's have ever picked second overall.

Well at least the franchise has finally caught up to the Nats in back to back 100 loss seasons!  😍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, murph said:

 

Personally for me as a fan, turning on the game just to see if the Orioles were actually still playing, and seeing that we had made it into the 12th up by one run, and then watching a pitcher I had no idea was even on the roster walk in a run and then give up and walk-off grand-slam is pretty much rock bottom.    

I know that we have a long way to go and one game is meaningless, but that was just depressing.    

 

o

 

The Orioles are 1-0 since they hit bottom.

 

o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • How long is a generation?  About 30 years?  The O's have been around in their modern incarnation for 66 years and have found themselves with Brooks, Cal, Eddie, Manny.  None of them are Trout, but the only Trouts ever are probably Cobb, Ruth, Mays, and Trout.  Bonds, I guess. And even Trout could fall off that list if his 30s don't quite measure up.
    • There were rumors to that effect, and also that Angelos pushed to take him because of his Greek ancestry.  I'm not sure there's any evidence of the latter, probably just supposition from the standard issue Angelos is a dunce narrative. 
    • Wes lived in Catonsville when I did (93-96).  I saw him at the Rolling Road Subway once. A great player who played for the great early 70s Baltimore Bullets as well as the only Washington Bullets team that won it all. The second iconic Baltimore superstar to come out of the University of Louisville, following Johnny U.  And maybe we have a 3rd now.
    • Every step away from a standard environment adds uncertainty to the data.  Gonzales has been playing in an environment that's like five standard deviations from the MLB mean in run context, and five standard deviations from the mean in quality of play.  I'm making up the five, but something like that.  On any given day he might be facing a pitcher who'll never play professionally and tops out at 80 mph, backed by a team that has no professional prospects, playing in a park with a runs and HR factor of 2.00.  Throw on top of that the fact that his last year in college the season stopped after 16 games. A normal top five pick has a range of outcomes that stretch from "washes out in AAA" to "inner circle HOFer", with a mean somewhere around "decent major leaguer for a while".  Almost by definition Gonzales' standard deviation of potential outcomes is higher than a player in a more normal context.  There's only so much you can tease out of data with that much noise. If it were me I'd give the scouting reports about 10 times the weight of his performance numbers, which means you have less real information to go on than you would with another player.  Absolutely he's a higher risk player than Martin, that's why he'll come substantially cheaper.
    • Fair enough. I thought that was reported as the consensus but who knows how teams actually felt.  Anyway, I was thinking of it in the context of Moose’s “Why can’t we get the steal for once.” Which is like saying why can’t we get lucky/smart with something everyone else missed. If we missed the other way with another guy later that doesn’t really matter. 
    • Tell that to the Dodgers. After he did not run hard after he hit a ball he thought was a home run, he admitted he would never be "Charley Hustle". And if you are hitting balls off of the outfield walls, you don't really have to hustle much to get to second base.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...