Jump to content
DocJJ

Would you trade Means?

Recommended Posts

On the one hand, we are in full rebuild mode- so no one should be considered untouchable.    

On the other hand, he's only 26, coming off an All-Star, ROY level campaign, is under team control for a while, and has been our best home-grown Starting pitcher... so I'd be most reluctant to part with him.   But what if someone made us a "WOW" offer?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we get a “wow” offer, sure maybe. 

I just don’t see anyone giving us an adequate offer as they would want to see a more established track record, particularly given his lack of pedigree. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having done it for half a season, I'm not sure what a wow offer would even be.  While you can always listen I cant imagine there will be any offer coming that I'd be happy with.  So at this point, no.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what would constitute a "WOW" offer.

Would a "WOW" offer consist of an established major league star or two?

Or would it consist of a large number of highly regarded prospects who might possibly be projected as being able to be significant contributors at the big league level - two, three, or four years  from now?

It seems to me that the latter is pretty much the type of "WOW" trading the Orioles did last year.  If they do it again this year, and again next year, and again the year after that, it sounds like a recipe for being permanently two, three, or four years away from contention.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Means won't be here on the next good team.  He has no future.  

You just say that cause he’s an 11th round pick. If we picked him instead of Brian Gonzalez you’d love him. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, makoman said:

You just say that cause he’s an 11th round pick. If we picked him instead of Brian Gonzalez you’d love him. 

Now you're getting it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DocJJ said:

On the one hand, we are in full rebuild mode- so no one should be considered untouchable.    

On the other hand, he's only 26, coming off an All-Star, ROY level campaign, is under team control for a while, and has been our best home-grown Starting pitcher... so I'd be most reluctant to part with him.   But what if someone made us a "WOW" offer?

 

Define “wow” offer?

The idea that a player is “untouchable” is a complete myth. Any player is for sale at the right price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't believe Means will sustain his 2019 level of performance and there's a team out there willing to pay like he will, then you absolutely go for it. I'm not sure such a trading partner exists though. Three months ago, Means's trade value was pretty much in the gutter. Even if he ends up in the bullpen with us, he still probably brings more value from that role than what we'd get in return from a trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d trade anyone on the current team for value in 2021+. 

Means has half a season of success. I don’t think we’d get an offer we’d like until after next year. He’s in a different boat than Mancini for me. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Means won't be here on the next good team.  He has no future.  

You think he is Brad Bergesen? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, BobDylanBundy said:

If you don't believe Means will sustain his 2019 level of performance and there's a team out there willing to pay like he will, then you absolutely go for it. I'm not sure such a trading partner exists though. Three months ago, Means's trade value was pretty much in the gutter. Even if he ends up in the bullpen with us, he still probably brings more value from that role than what we'd get in return from a trade.

This is basically where I am. I don’t believe that that team is out there, either…they see the same thing(s) we do. He’s a 5-inning wonder who confuses/misses bats with a plus pitch, and that’s fantastic, but that FIP and (even more so) xFIP still concern me somewhat.

But no, I just think that it’s too much of a SSS/thin track record for any team – unless it’s truly in what-the-hey, go-for-broke mode – to give up anything of value.  I’d certainly float his name out there anyway, just to gauge the market (if there’s indeed one).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, weams said:

You think he is Brad Bergesen? 

I was being sarcastic.  

I think Means might be the real deal.  That changeup is legit.  Let's see where he is in a year from now, though.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • I don't imagine Mason Williams will be able to play the next few days so we will probably get to see more of Hays on this homestand.
    • From a purely impersonal point of view, I agree with you.    But in the real world, guys who have been with the club most of the year and have made some contributions aren’t going to be completely cut off.    They’ll get tossed a bone here and there.     And yes, I realize that one can debate whether Smith or Wilkerson  “made some contributions.”    
    • It was intended as a wisecrack.    The mores of 1976 weren’t the same as today.    Believe me, Weaver said a lot worse.     As to Cuellar, I understand Weaver made the remark after Cuellar complained about not getting enough starts in 1976, a year in which he went 4-13 with a 4.96 ERA (66 ERA+).    To me it was just Weaver’s colorful way of saying that he felt he’d given Cuellar plenty of chances that year.    Not a comment on Cuellar’s overall performance during his career.    And my point in quoting Weaver was that Cuellar got a lot more chances that year than a pitcher without his track record would have gotten.     Even Earl Weaver believed that a guy who had earned it over a long period of time deserved some rope.   Buck was far from alone in that regard.   
    • They have to many players on the team.  I think they should be evaluating the guys who need evaluating.  I think we can close the book on Smith and Wilkerson.
    • I would keep Villar.  He is a good major league player.  We have too few of them to give them away.
    • It was a cheap shot on his first wife as well.
    • I haven't done the full 40-man eval but I'd protect him over the other guys you listed. Would the plus curve and the slider that is more slurrvy, I think he's got a pretty good chance of being a solid bullpen arm. From July to the end of the year batters slashed .147/.284/.206/.490 off him with a 0.47 ERA over 19.1 IP with 22 Ks and 11 BBs. Agreed the fastball command needs to tighten up a bit but at 93-95, it has enough on it to keep guys honest even when he not commanding as well.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...