Jump to content
Roll Tide

Chirs Davis per Mike Elias

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LA2 said:

Your analogy machine isn't working too well! There are many more apt and recent examples. For example, Carl Crawford, Pablo Sandoval, and Prince Fielder.

I'm getting  old, so 1970's analogies are sometimes  easier for me to come up with.😅

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, LA2 said:

You'd be surprised at how quickly the price of two packs of cigs per appearance piles up!

That's right. Full Pack Stanhouse,

Stanhouse drove Weaver to distraction by his strategy of his walking batters he didn't want to face. Guess it  all caught up with Stanhouse  when he went to LA.

All teams have bad contracts. Sometimes you have to cut your losses. I'm hoping that if Davis does not improve over the remainder of the season, him and the club can come to some sort of agreement (short of them cutting him and still paying him every cent for the rest of his contract while he sits at home).  A buyout of some kind. 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, interloper said:

While I think most of Elias's quote is GM speak that we can't learn much from, the one aspect that DOES worry me is the inclusion of "he's under contract" which is a VERY Peter Angelos phrase. 

Well, even if we cut him, won't he still technically be under contract.  They aren't gonna get out of paying him, so.... 

I always thought with the money he has left he'd be here all year.  If the plan is 3 #1's (or high pick target), there is reason to work with him and put him out there.  He is helping secure a lower pick.  And if he does anything they get something out of the deal.  Spring is the next best window and I still have a feeling it's end of 2020 season.  He is already paid, so cutting doesn't save money.  Cutting him and getting someone else costs more money.  And they aren't looking to win right now.

Elias made a comment that every move would have long term evaluation as a priority.  Right now, cutting Davis doesn't help get high draft picks, doesn't save money and may cost service time to another player.  It does suck watching him swing at crappy pitches and watching balls down the middle of the plate (seriously, sometimes I really don't get his pitch selection).  At the same time, at this point he's helpful in securing a higher pick. 

Maybe silly justification, but it does put me at peace with it. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, LA2 said:

Your analogy machine isn't working too well! There are many more apt and recent examples. For example, Carl Crawford, Pablo Sandoval, and Prince Fielder.

My best comp is Ryan Howard.  His final contract with the Phillies was 5/125 for his age 32-36 seasons.  During that time he put up a whopping -4.6 WAR. There were injuries in 2012 and 2013, but the falloff was drastic even taking that into account.

I'm not convinced that looking to history will provide too much insight on the Chris Davis situation, but if we are going to go there, then it's worthwhile to point out that Howard stayed on the Phillies roster until the bitter end then cost the Phillies an additional $10 million after they declined his  2017 option.  No crazy talk about walking away out of "decency" from Ryan.  No siree...

It's been three full seasons since Howard last played a MLB game.  I wonder if during that time, a single person who wasn't some sports talk radio yahoo ever got in his face about that contract.  My guess is no.  I think CD understands that once his playing days are over, he can look forward to the second half of his life blissfully guilt-free in regard to his last Orioles contract.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, jerios55 said:

Well, even if we cut him, won't he still technically be under contract.  They aren't gonna get out of paying him, so.... 

No.  He'll be a free agent and we'll still owe him everything except the minimum that is picked up by the signing team (as if that would ever happen!).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, jerios55 said:

Well, even if we cut him, won't he still technically be under contract.  They aren't gonna get out of paying him, so.... 

I always thought with the money he has left he'd be here all year.  If the plan is 3 #1's (or high pick target), there is reason to work with him and put him out there.  He is helping secure a lower pick.  And if he does anything they get something out of the deal.  Spring is the next best window and I still have a feeling it's end of 2020 season.  He is already paid, so cutting doesn't save money.  Cutting him and getting someone else costs more money.  And they aren't looking to win right now.

Elias made a comment that every move would have long term evaluation as a priority.  Right now, cutting Davis doesn't help get high draft picks, doesn't save money and may cost service time to another player.  It does suck watching him swing at crappy pitches and watching balls down the middle of the plate (seriously, sometimes I really don't get his pitch selection).  At the same time, at this point he's helpful in securing a higher pick. 

Maybe silly justification, but it does put me at peace with it. 

I think there is no chance that Elias wants Davis on the team to help secure the top draft pick.  For one thing, if that was the master plan, Davis would be playing more and hitting higher in the lineup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

No.  He'll be a free agent and we'll still owe him everything except the minimum that is picked up by the signing team (as if that would ever happen!).

 

Well, we'd still be contractually obligated to pay him, but I won't pretend there are differences.  And I do base part of that comment on the fact that I doubt others will try him out as a reclamation attempt.  If I were Davis, I wouldn't try another team if cut loose. 

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think there is no chance that Elias wants Davis on the team to help secure the top draft pick.  For one thing, if that was the master plan, Davis would be playing more and hitting higher in the lineup.

Well, hopefully Hyde does get decisions with the lineup and Elias gives him the 40 man.  I'd like to think they talk a bit, but if I were Hyde, I'd play the same game. 

I'm not saying Elias is sabotaging the team on a level that others would.  My only point is cutting him doesn't really net anything at this point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's only money...

Personally, I hate that the Angelosii haven't released him.  I think it's bad for morale that he's on the team.  But, as they have in the past, the Angelosii seem to still be erring on the wrong side.  I can't imagine Elias has any allegiance to CD and since every other money contract has been jettisoned, I'd imagine that he'd feel CD's should be too.

Yet, the contract is a sunk cost.  And the payroll won't really change by releasing him because we're still on the hook.  So whatever. 

Pay him or pay him seems to be the choices.  No team in the league will sign him to play, but if they do sign him it will be a bonus to what we're required to pay.  Somehow THAT seems even a harder kick in the nuts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Davis reached his 10-year milestone today. With 10 years in the majors and at least five on his current team, he now has full no-trade rights and can refuse a trade to any team. 

No, I don't expect that to be an issue.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Davis reached his 10-year milestone today. With 10 years in the majors and at least five on his current team, he now has full no-trade rights and can refuse a trade to any team. 

No, I don't expect that to be an issue.

God hates the Orioles.  But don't let anybody tell you He doesn't have a sense of humor...

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Three of the Mets' five starting pitchers have higher OPSs than our mighty first baseman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/16/2019 at 2:48 PM, NCRaven said:

No.  He'll be a free agent and we'll still owe him everything except the minimum that is picked up by the signing team (as if that would ever happen!).

 

It will still count against payroll. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, LA2 said:

Three of the Mets' five starting pitchers have higher OPSs than our mighty first baseman.

I thought he was heating up again?

Maybe he's upset about missing the All Star game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, weams said:

It will still count against payroll. 

Correct, but if they could get an agreement with him to put the next $51 M (3*17) into the pot of deferred money and stretch out the payment schedule, the annual pain wouldn't be so great. Yeah I know, pipe dream.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • I think  Zach Davies can make a strong case for it, based on his turn around success.
    • While the Orioles continue to make outside hires for various departments, they’re also likely to do some shuffling of personnel in the minors. Nothing is official, but I’ve heard from various people that Single-A Delmarva manager Kyle Moore could join high Single-A Frederick as Ryan Minor’s replacement. Minor league infield coordinator Dave Anderson would be given the managing job with the Shorebirds under this scenario. Delmarva development coach Pat Leyland, son of former major league manager Jim Leyland, might manage one of the Dominican Summer League teams. Triple-A Norfolk hitting coach Butch Davis has been offered a role on Double-A Bowie’s coaching staff. https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2019/09/nunez-hoping-hand-heals-and-hes-available-tonight.html
    • Honestly outside of the truly elite not many SPs go 6+ innings anymore so I'm not sure I'd hold that against him. The telling stat for me is that his era is a 1.5 is better than our next best SP (Bundy). He's literally been a lone diamond in a dumpster fire. 
    • I doubt it, but don’t know who the logical candidates are.
    • Just in time, the AFL season starts today.    As a reminder, this year the O’s players are on the Surprise Saguaros, and include: Rylan Bannon Cody Carroll Dean Kremer  David Lebron  Mason McCoy Alex Wells  With Austin Hays joining once the major league season ends.   Kyle Moore (Delmarva’s manager) is serving as one of the coaches. The regular season runs through October 25.    I’m looking forward to having some more box scores to read!
    • Was Mancini bad enough last year to be in the running for national comeback player of the year?
    • I don't think this was a case of players and coaches overlooking Temple or letting the big wins get to their head, this was a case of a QB who struggled under the first pressure he saw and awful play calling, particularly in the red zone.  The fact that Temple tried to give them the game twice and the awful play calling kept trying to stuff it up the middle, when they have Piggy, McFarland and Leake. Are you telling me that anyone here thinks if they had spread out the defense, put Piggy in shotgun with McFarland and Leake that they don't think they could get a yard with a option play? My biggest concern is that the game calling is always going to be this unimaginative and awful in the red zone when the line is going to be dominated. Good coordinators understand their weakness and strengths and play to their strengths in personnel and don't try the cookie cutter old school approach. I'm also concerns that Jackson will continue to struggle when he pressured. He's not very mobile back there and once he was under pressure his decision making and accuracy dropped off significantly. That's a yellow flag for me. This game was a giant let down because they had an opportunity to go under a Nationally televised game ranked against Penn State but instead, looked like the same old Terp football program that shrinks as soon as it as a chance to shine. I also have concerns that Locksley did not over rule the play calls and also went for that awful two-point conversion. Had they gone for field goal and made it, the Terps could have gone ahead with a field goal instead of being stuffed twice on the goal line in the 4th QTR. It was one game, and people can improve and learn, but what I saw was a coaching staff and quarterback that appeared to be over their heads in their first real test of adversity.  Now if they can come out and play a good close game against Penn State it might heal some things, but only a win would erase this debacle.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...