Jump to content
MurphDogg

Rule 5 eligible players

Recommended Posts

Just now, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Chris Lee was released the other day, so I don't think we have to worry about him.

Dietz can't find the strike zone to save his life in Frederick.

Yeah, I only added Dietz because he has been on the OH top 30 the last couple years. He is clearly not a candidate to be added or selected.

I missed Lee being released, I really only added him because he was actually on the 40-man roster a while back and he at last managed to strike people out this year, if nothing else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on how much room we have but Kremer, Akin, Wells, Mountcastle, and Diaz are the only no brainers for me.   Not too afraid of losing any of the others but I think the odds of getting picked and lasting a whole year in the majors are not real good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Depends on how much room we have but Kremer, Akin, Wells, Mountcastle, and Diaz are the only no brainers for me.   Not too afraid of losing any of the others but I think the odds of getting picked and lasting a whole year in the majors are not real good.

I think McKenna would get picked and could last a whole year in the Majors. It is harder for an outfielder to last, but Carlos Tocci and Victor Reyes both lasted full seasons in 2018 as Rule 5 players. They were similar level prospects, but McKenna has more power than both Tocci and Reyes and both Tocci and Reyes lasted all season despite recording sub 50 OPS+ in the Majors. As long as he is a legitimate centerfielder defensively, I think he could stick as a fourth outfielder.

I think it may come down how he looks the last 6+ weeks of the season and I imagine he will get another season in the AFL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, let's see what McKenna does the last 6 weeks.  As of now, I believe Luke thinks 4th of is his most likely outcome.  If someone wants to pick him and stash him for a year, more power to them.  What kind of numbers did those other guys put up the year they were selected?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RZNJ said:

Yeah, let's see what McKenna does the last 6 weeks.  As of now, I believe Luke thinks 4th of is his most likely outcome.  If someone wants to pick him and stash him for a year, more power to them.  What kind of numbers did those other guys put up the year they were selected?

We currently have Broxton, Smith Jr and Wilkerson on the 40 man right now. Of course you protect McKenna (and Diaz) over any of them.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

We currently have Broxton, Smith Jr and Wilkerson on the 40 man right now. Of course you protect McKenna (and Diaz) over any of them.

Is Broxton on contract beyond this season?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

We currently have Broxton, Smith Jr and Wilkerson on the 40 man right now. Of course you protect McKenna (and Diaz) over any of them.

Chances of losing McKenna are slim and none.  Broxton isn't here next year.  50/50 that Smith and Wilkerson are. Difference is that they are already on the 40 man.  Every year I go through this.  Everyone wants to protect too many guys.  Everyone is afraid of losing someone who is 22 and hitting .235 in AA and striking out 1/4 of the time.  And some team is going to pick him, why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RZNJ said:

Chances of losing McKenna are slim and none.  Broxton isn't here next year.  50/50 that Smith and Wilkerson are. Difference is that they are already on the 40 man.  Every year I go through this.  Everyone wants to protect too many guys.  Everyone is afraid of losing someone who is 22 and hitting .235 in AA and striking out 1/4 of the time.  And some team is going to pick him, why?

If Broxton isn't here next year, and Smith and Wilkerson are 50/50, who do you think will fill those spots on the 40 man?

You think they prefer to find another Smith Jr over protecting McKenna?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DirtyBird said:

If Broxton isn't here next year, and Smith and Wilkerson are 50/50, who do you think will fill those spots on the 40 man?

You think they prefer to find another Smith Jr over protecting McKenna?

Too early to tell.  If there's plenty of room then a guy like McKenna probably gets protected.  Guys like him, Peralta, and Sedlock are fringy.  I could see a team selecting Peralta but he'd still be a lonshot to stick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RZNJ said:

Too early to tell.  If there's plenty of room then a guy like McKenna probably gets protected.  Guys like him, Peralta, and Sedlock are fringy.  I could see a team selecting Peralta but he'd still be a lonshot to stick

Nobody is taking Peralta. Right now, it looks like Alvarado would be much more likely to be picked than Peralta.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Nobody is taking Peralta. Right now, it looks like Alvarado would be much more likely to be picked than Peralta.

Peralta is starting verses Alvarado relieving.  Alvarado is 93-96 as a reliever.  Peralta is pretty much that as a starter and probably a tick better.  A team thinking slightly outside the box could take a look at Peralta as a one inning reliever.  Good chance he sits 96-98 as a reliever.  Doesn't mean he'll be good but teams take fliers on that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Peralta is starting verses Alvarado relieving.  Alvarado is 93-96 as a reliever.  Peralta is pretty much that as a starter and probably a tick better.  A team thinking slightly outside the box could take a look at Peralta as a one inning reliever.  Good chance he sits 96-98 as a reliever.  Doesn't mean he'll be good but teams take fliers on that.

Peralta’s secondary stuff is better too. Alvarado has the profile of a guy who’d have to be left handed or dominating AAA to get selected and it still wouldn’t be likely. If the ceiling is 35/40, they better be MLB ready to warrant Rule 5 consideration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Idc about trading away a slot we weren’t going to use. Elias traded “nothing” for something. It’s been Elias’ MO to target NCAA Pitchers around rounds 11-25. We’re not looking for these NCAA guys he’s acquired to be Verlander, but they can be bullpen and back end rotation types.  We have to trust our analytics dept here.      
    • I actually missed these last two dominant outings but after seeing what Roch had to say, went back and watched. Those were indeed impressive. (Zimmerman, not so much).
    • Again, for sure I agree the deal was a plus for that one year. But meh since that may be it. Unless I'm missing sth with Lucas...? Will certainly be happy if he's another Lopez.
    • I am excited to see our prospect list after the 2021 season. I’d bet we have a couple exciting international guys by then.
    • ^this I am going to give whoever wants to listen a perspective on these kids vs American kids.  We all know about travel baseball and what not, going into high school here and then possibly college. In these countries, DR, Cuba, Venezuela etc, kids who have some talent or if they seem somewhat athletic and you see the parents who are a 6’ women and a 6’3” guy, then at 11 or 12 years old, they pretty much ditch school(they kind of go to school) and end up in these baseball type compounds where they learn and are fed right(somewhat). Basically the handlers promise to do whatever it takes to get the kid a payday and in exchange they get a majority of the signing bonus but teach, feed and take care of the kids along the way. Parents reluctantly go with it because it is one less mouth and these guys are salesman like no other and sell the dream even though the family will see little or no money if the kids do end up going to the US. So a 12 year old is now getting the training and structure that maybe a top end high school in the US or a college kid gets. When one of these kids enters the dsl at say 16, he is basically entering as a US kid out of high school. By the time they are 18 or 19, they have had enough coaching to be at a college level kid from the US. The only thing holding these kids back is waiting for there body to catch up with the knowledge. There for a while, and still a little bit now, the handlers don’t want to wait for the kids body’s to grow and fill out, so they tell the kids they need these “vitamin” shots. At 6’3” and 170#(that is a pound sign not hashtag for you kids out there), I doubt these kids got “vitamin” shots.  The purpose of me lining all of that out, these kids at 17-18 are more advanced than what you would get out of high school kids.  Basically we are just waiting for them to fill out a bit and hone their craft more as they do that. A 17-18 year old out of the DR or Cuba, I wouldn’t be surprised if they were ready in the next two or three years if they will ever be good enough to make it to the majors. So when you say 8 years from now, we will see what we have, my case above says we will know in the next two or three years as they fill out a bit and physically mature.    -Source=My time in Cuba, Columbia and Panama, just in case you think I am full of poop with my armchair quarterbacking or making stuff up. The Cuban kids don’t have handlers, the government really just takes the kids over and it is more like the US gymnastic team.  I could go on forever about Cuba. 
    • I think the similarity in their names annoys him j/k. Nine straight scoreless outings should be cheered, not meh'd; that's 1/6 of the elapsed season. 1.50ERA+, 12.6 SO/9, and an increase of SO/W from .83 to 2.0 to 2.5 during 2018-20 is quite an improvement--maybe even more significant than how many of only 5 inherited runners scored.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...