Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Tom Boswell tears down the tear down strategy

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TonySoprano said:

Boz is like a college professor with tenure.  No one touches them and they are allowed to retire on their own terms.  He was once one of my favorite writers but I refuse to give his publication any views for years.

Boswell is a dinosaur and doesn't understand baseball today. There is a huge difference to what the Orioles are doing in 2019 versus the drought of 1998-2011. Has he even read Astroball?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, eddie83 said:

The whole topic kind of amuses me. Teams have always done rebuilds, it just now they are more transparent about it and are no longer wasting their money on veteran position players who don’t produce anyway. The quality pitchers by in large have always gone to contenders.  

 

When you aren't the Dodger, Yankees, Red Sox it doesn't make sense to sign high priced (and usually average) free agents when rebuilding your organization. Invest all that $$$ into player development instead and build a team that will be capable of winning every year. 

It's not really that hard to understand if you take a few minutes to think about it. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wildcard said:

No the article is not really about the O"s.   And when you think of it Boswell has never seen a Washington based MLB team win the World Series.  It may seem to him that playing well is the goal for the Nats.    He almost seems to be telling the Nats not to go down the tear down route now that Scherzer and company are getting older. 

In truth he Nats aren't faced with the same kind of competition that the O's are.   Atlanta, Philadelphia and Washington are similar markets.   The Mets and Marlins have been poorly run for years.   It not like trying to win the World Series in a division with the Yankees and Boston -- two of the MLB's richest teams.

I think Elias is right to go the route he is going.   Trying to accumulate as much talent as possible to make a run to the WS.   Its the best shot the O's have.

Boswell has never seen a Washington based team win a playoff series let alone World Series. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, theocean said:

That's my point. There's a lot of people who think that a complete teardown is the only way to go after the success of the Astros. It simply will not work for all teams if a bunch of teams are trying that strategy at the same time.

Maybe not, but even if all the bad teams from today don't all become good at the same time, at least they will have put all their resources towards developing young, cheap talent rather than saddling themselves with $10s of millions in mid-level free agents.

Eventually we should get back to a point of more competitive balance as more and more small-to-mid or even large market teams focus on building from within instead of signing free agents.  They won't need to tank, at least not often, if they're successful.  Unless the players and larger teams succeed in changing the CBA to shift a lot of compensation to younger players. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Boswell is a dinosaur and doesn't understand baseball today. There is a huge difference to what the Orioles are doing in 2019 versus the drought of 1998-2011. Has he even read Astroball?

Remember when he invented Total Average?  It was flawed, but pretty cutting edge for 40 years ago.  It's like that didn't really catch on so he gave up on analytics and shifted focus to bashing the Angelos regime, and celebrating every opportunity for the Nats to stick it to Baltimore.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its only a matter of time before MLB brings in the ping-pong balls and goes to a draft lottery. Hopefully not for a few more seasons.

Edited by fansince1988
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, fansince1988 said:

I think its only a matter of time before MLB brings in the ping-pong balls and goes to a draft lottery. Hopefully not for a few more seasons.

That sure put a stop to tanking in the NBA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

That sure put a stop to tanking in the NBA.

The closed-door ping pong ball draft system didn't put a stop to tanking, but it did open the door for draft manipulation. Just wait until we lose 120 games and then Boston or the Mets end up with the number one overall pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, fansince1988 said:

The closed-door ping pong ball draft system didn't put a stop to tanking, but it did open the door for draft manipulation. Just wait until we lose 120 games and then Boston or the Mets end up with the number one overall pick.

Or the Rays can move to Orlando and happen to get back to back #1 picks.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, fansince1988 said:

I think its only a matter of time before MLB brings in the ping-pong balls and goes to a draft lottery. Hopefully not for a few more seasons.

Make the draft order by inverse of population within a 20 mile radius of the team's stadium.  The only way you can game the draft is to get people to move away, or build a stadium where nobody lives.  The Yanks are more-or-less permanently the #30 pick, the older team in a two-team market gets 66% of the overlap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

Make the draft order by inverse of population within a 20 mile radius of the team's stadium.  The only way you can game the draft is to get people to move away, or build a stadium where nobody lives.  The Yanks are more-or-less permanently the #30 pick, the older team in a two-team market gets 66% of the overlap.

Sounds like the Braves already planned for this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Tx Oriole said:

To me baseball was more fun then. Maybe it was because of the players then. I don’t know for sure why but baseball seems not as much fun now as then. Same with the NFL. Maybe it’s because I’m old and lost some interest I’ll guess. 

 

 

Most all things were more fun when I was young.  Most nostalgic desire for going back to a past time is psychodynamically a yearning to be young again. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, fansince1988 said:

I think its only a matter of time before MLB brings in the ping-pong balls and goes to a draft lottery. Hopefully not for a few more seasons.

Nonsense...teams that finish in the last half dozen or so should get even more picks in the draft and should be able to trade them.   Teams that can spend 200 million should never get first round picks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most Nats fans hate the Orioles more than they like their own team, so Boswell has to cater to those folks by writing something like this.  Especially in the wake of mid-season prospect reports giving a lot of credit to the Orioles and the Nationals struggling to find pieces they can trade to improve their major league club.  

Also, lest Boswell forget, the Nationals essentially employed this strategy once getting to DC, which allowed them to add homegrown elite talent such as Harper (#1 OVR 2010), Strasburg (#1 OVR 2009) and Rendon (#6 OVR 2011) that has been at the core of their success.  In a sense, the Nationals were the blueprint for the Cubs and Astros, who are now the blueprint for the Orioles and other teams.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 202 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Looks like an Israeli company has developed a test, hope it can be mass produced quickly.
    • Echoed.  I heard beat reporter Susan Slusser on the FG team preview podcast call Kemp the favorite.  Their lineup except Olson is exclusively RHH, so Kemp gets the edge on Barreto/Mateo there.  Plus they have Neuse hopelessly blocked by Chapman so they had him goofing with 2B Moustakas style last September.  And they took a Rule V infielder. Hanser Alberto might be Oakland's fourth string 2B. I am almost positive Oakland will keep whichever of Barreto/Mateo they like best to succeed Semien, who despite being beloved has likely played his way out of their price range. MLBTR has summarized: https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2020/02/athletics-second-base-franklin-barreto-jorge-mateo-2020.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+MlbTradeRumors+(MLB+Trade+Rumors) The Tigers have Schoop, so if I'm figuring correctly we should have a shot at first claim if we want.  Perhaps Luke is thinking of just the right lowball token guy right now.
    • I put up a better version I have on my harddrive  
    • 3 years before he put it on vinyl! 1973. This is really the version that runs thru my head... besides the commercial version you've heard 10,000 times. Skip this^^^^^ Watch this one! vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
    • That’s a worthwhile take, and not something to entirely rule out.  They pitch with different levels of maturity today so perhaps you’re more right than you think, but I value the speed changing ease that Hall can utilize and their stuff is otherwise close to even.  Ranking them closely is intelligent and there’s data to support you too.  Still, it’s hard to not have Hall higher due to ceiling height potential alone....it could end up higher and he’s further from his peak than Baumann is; two significant factors.   I don’t see him thriving at Norfolk initially either and he may not be in the class of their rotation at the season’s start.  8 to 13 starts into the year however it might be a case of him going up and never looking back.   Strong supporters of him like you and I probably expect this on some level.  That’s a mean 1-2 punch and I’m happy to have both in our colors.  I want lots of innings and lots of learning if there’s adversity.  Ornery Baumann could be devastating and having him in a tier by himself is logical.  
    • Also remember this isn’t a guy who sits 90-91.  He can roll mid 90’s for innings and show stuff to mix off of it and finish.  It’s hard to not pull for a guy who’s so obviously trying to maximize his skills along with his focus.  If he’s taken to coaching and his control can go from decent to elite level he may get even better.  Mound presence plus stuff and command make for a nice window.   
    • Baumann Bowie or Norfolk is one of the barnburners of the season opening assignments.  I think they'll send him back, and he'll be ornery.  Cherry picking for his Eastern League workload, his H/9 was 2nd and HR/9 was 3rd out of the 60ish pitchers who got to 70 innings, and that was his AA debut in the warmer summer months.  That AA H/9 was better than Hall's Frederick one, where we know to some extent batters just didn't swing.  Arguably he blew through AA, with hot stuff scouting reports backing it up. He's established himself to me on a tier of his own, and feels like he has a really wide range of outcomes - probably the biggest wildcard for how high will the Orioles peak farm ranking get before Rutschman exits the list next year.  Assuming they are rotation mates, it won't take more than a couple Baumann gems and Hall 4-5 BB outings to put their pecking order in a little doubt in my mind.  They are both mid-September birthdays 3 years apart.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...