Jump to content
Tony-OH

MLB lifers decry the state of the modern baseball: 'Unwatchable'

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I would like to see the mound raised again.  Seems like that would swing the balance towards the pitchers more.  Would it effect HR numbers any?

That would be a great way to get to 13 K/9 and drive batting averages down into the .210s.  Overall homers might decrease a little, but homers as a percentage of hits would probably go up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, drjohnnyfeva said:

We're seeing minions everywhere...  THAT makes it boring.  There used to be a variety of skill sets and abilities that were put together to work as a team.  I'm not certain that is the case now.

We know that certain types of players and styles of play are going extinct or already are.  A long time ago we lost the smaller guy who'd work the count and hit .320 with a ton of walks but little power.  We're losing the .300 line drive hitter.  Few players are of the Nick Markakis mold, with good contact skills but low to moderate power.  Hanser Alberto is kind of unique.  I don't think we've had a Boggs or Gwynn since Boggs and Gwynn.  Ichiro was wonderful, but he's the only one of that type since probably the 50s or 60s.  Billy Hamilton is one of the last of the pure speed guys like Vince Coleman.

If you don't have loft and max exit velocity, or the potential to get there, you're written off as a prospect.  I think that someone like Richie Ashburn would be retooled in A ball to swing hard and hit the ball in the air and ends up as a Joey Rickard.  An Eddie Yost type would have to hit more homers or be out of baseball. The Alou brothers would be 4th outfielder, role players.  Maybe Felipe with some power would have a shot.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, sevastras said:

Fair enough, but this whole thread is speculation and absurd suggestions on how to make the game more interesting.  I think my argument has more merit than 3 balls equal a walk, foul balls in play are now fair, you can steal first, moving the bases, adding a base, moving walls in, no pitches over 93mph, dancing girls in cages at the park 

Maybe we need a competition.  The NL can have no DH, beanball wars, fistfights, catchers setting up 20' up the 3B line wrestling runners to the plate, no limits on takeout slides, and $50,000 bonuses for knocking an opponent out of the game.  No more extra innings, ties decided by a steel cage match.  The AL can continue on with wussified baseball.  We'll see who wins with ratings and attendance and revenues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

We know that certain types of players and styles of play are going extinct or already are.  A long time ago we lost the smaller guy who'd work the count and hit .320 with a ton of walks but little power.  We're losing the .300 line drive hitter.  Few players are of the Nick Markakis mold, with good contact skills but low to moderate power.  Hanser Alberto is kind of unique.  I don't think we've had a Boggs or Gwynn since Boggs and Gwynn.  Ichiro was wonderful, but he's the only one of that type since probably the 50s or 60s.  Billy Hamilton is one of the last of the pure speed guys like Vince Coleman.

If you don't have loft and max exit velocity, or the potential to get there, you're written off as a prospect.  I think that someone like Richie Ashburn would be retooled in A ball to swing hard and hit the ball in the air and ends up as a Joey Rickard.  An Eddie Yost type would have to hit more homers or be out of baseball. The Alou brothers would be 4th outfielder, role players.  Maybe Felipe with some power would have a shot.

Scotty Mcgregor was drafted 14th overall back in the day.  I wonder how he would be drafted today.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, atomic said:

Scotty Mcgregor was drafted 14th overall back in the day.  I wonder how he would be drafted today.  

How hard did he throw in college?  I remember the 1980s McGregor who topped out around 86.  He probably would have been converted to a sidearm LOOGY in the minors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Hmmm so our #13 Prospect projects to nothing more than a utility guy? and presumably everyone behind him has as much or less potential?
    • I will plant the Adam Hall flag here - probably on my own island - well as a comp to Vavra - not necessarily at 13. Both Hall and Vavra played in the South Atlantic League last year.  Vavra had extreme home away splits and by extreme I mean Home 400/484/640/1124 and AWAY 224/320/316/636. Hall's overall numbers trail Vavra due to that extreme split, but in (IMO) the most legitimate comp between the two - Hall outhit Vavra on the road with a respectable 291/360/369/729.  League average numbers for the South Atlantic League last year were 239/316/362/677 which Vavra's road numbers trail.  Vavra's road numbers also trailed those of the promoted 2019 draft picks Johnny Rizer and Toby Welk in the Sally League in 2019 - prospects I don't think we will see anywhere near here. As Tony mentioned, included in Vavra's numbers are superior BB/K numbers which were 62/62 in 2019 with similar home/away splits.  Hall did walk in about 9% of his PAs, but struck out much more often in 117 times - nearly a quarter of his PAs. I believe Hall has a better middle infield defensive profile with a chance, albeit a low one, to stick at SS but capable of playing a competent major league 2B IMO.   A final important factor to me is that Hall is two years younger than Vavra and played about one year younger than the Sally League average in 2019 while Vavra was a year older than league average. Tony has the inside word here and the Os had to like something in Vavra to take him in trade so I will prepare in advance to eat future crow when I say I prefer Hall to Vavra.
    • Was Mountcastle playing third when he was called up?
    • Double plays is where the poor arm comes in. This is an interesting part of the list every year because it's where Tony has to mix in 40-45 FV guys with really young guys with huge risk. I'm sure there's a system, but I definitely don't have one. Lol. As for Vavra and even Diaz, it's worth noting that there's some upside there as the ceiling is a 50 FV guy. Having a few guys in the upper minors with a 50 FV is a good thing. They won't all pan out, but if one or two of these types of guys pans out to that 50 FV then you have a real asset on your hands.  The same is true with pitchers, where we have a lot of guys who kind of fit a Vavra-like profile. Means was one of them, and look what happened. There's value here for sure.
    • I would think the poor arm won't factor in that regularly at 2B where it would prevent him from being an everyday option there, particularly if the bat plays. Other than throws home or to third, where would a poor arm as a 2B come into play? The answer may be during large shifts, but could you leave him in the regular 2B spot and slide the SS or 3B into shallow RF for the exaggerated shifts? The main issue then would be shifts on right-handed hitters...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...