Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
weams

Cost Cutting Measures

Recommended Posts

The entire premise of this thread has absolutely no basis in reality. None. You know why the Nats got all that money awarded to them? Because MASN is making a LOT more money than the O's would ever admit, and Angelos was trying to rip the Nats off for every single penny he could. So so poor Angelos and his 2 billion dollar baseball team(s). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Satyr3206 said:

Actually yes. As with any business if it isn't making a profit problems occur. Some significant, some not.

You think that majority ownership of the TV rights for the 4th largest combined TV market in MLB isn't making any money? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TradeAngelos said:

You think that majority ownership of the TV rights for the 4th largest combined TV market in MLB isn't making any money? 

I merely answered a question. I have no idea of the Orioles and Masn's financial health. Or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, TradeAngelos said:

The entire premise of this thread has absolutely no basis in reality. None. You know why the Nats got all that money awarded to them? Because MASN is making a LOT more money than the O's would ever admit, and Angelos was trying to rip the Nats off for every single penny he could. So so poor Angelos and his 2 billion dollar baseball team(s). 

You make it seem as if this was a one way street.    The Nats were also grubbing for everything they could get.    If they had gotten everything they wanted, MASN truly would have been bankrupt.    But the RSDC did not give them that.     

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/24/2019 at 12:56 PM, dmvsports410 said:

Emerson Hancock is the best pitcher is next years class, and Spencer Torklinson (spelling lol?) is the best bat I think. 

I was going to mention Kumar Rocker but I guess hes a freshman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Frobby said:

You make it seem as if this was a one way street.    The Nats were also grubbing for everything they could get.    If they had gotten everything they wanted, MASN truly would have been bankrupt.    But the RSDC did not give them that.     

The Nats got a sweetheart deal to bring the team to DC, and its not like they were being supported back in Montreal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Camden_yardbird said:

I was going to mention Kumar Rocker but I guess hes a freshman.

Yes he is, He is likely to be the 1-1 in 2021 and that is why its important that we totally stink next year. I am not usually a guy who goes for draft position but I really want Rocker. It would be a shame to be historically bad for three years and then just miss out on a talent like that by winning a few extra meaningless games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

Yes he is, He is likely to be the 1-1 in 2021 and that is why its important that we totally stink next year. I am not usually a guy who goes for draft position but I really want Rocker. It would be a shame to be historically bad for three years and then just miss out on a talent like that by winning a few extra meaningless games.

On the other hand, what if they suck on purpose, get Rocker and he turns out to be like Hobgood, which could happen?

What would you have gained, by tanking?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

How much is the per household charge for MASN now? I see where it was $2.00 per household back in 2006.

Technically, my comcast package, I dont pay anything.

But, I am sure, COMCAST doesn't get the signal for free from MASN.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

The Nats got a sweetheart deal to bring the team to DC, and its not like they were being supported back in Montreal.

A sweetheart deal?  Washington is bigger and richer than Baltimore.  But they have to share MASN profits with the Orioles, and will always have a minority stake in MASN.  They will not get the revenues that they would if not for this agreement.  The Nats most certainly would rather have the ability to form their own media deal or entity.  I'm guessing the Lerners really wish the Senators' owners had blocked the Browns move in '54, which they didn't.

It's only a sweetheart deal for the Nats if you believe that the Orioles should have full control over the entire DC-Baltimore market in perpetuity.  If the NL and AL actually competed with one another there would have been a team in DC decades ago and it would be laughable to suggest that the DC team subsidize the Baltimore team.  

I understand that Oriole fans are upset that our team can't continue to get all the DC fans and their money, but it's not the same city.  I never understood why Angelos had any say about whether a city 40 miles away gets a team.  The Giants didn't get special treatment when the A's moved in.  The Dodgers didn't get compensated when the Angels were awarded a team.  I don't think the Yanks cried about their business model being disrupted when the Mets came around.  OPACY to Nats park is 37 miles, and well over an hour in traffic.  The Oakland Coliseum is 16 miles from AT&T Park.  The Dodgers and Angels are 30 miles apart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

On the other hand, what if they suck on purpose, get Rocker and he turns out to be like Hobgood, which could happen?

What would you have gained, by tanking?

Well, I guess that could happen but the comparison of Rocker to Hobgood seems really a reach. The only thing they have in common is that they pitch. But, to answer your question... we have gained nothing except a wasted 1-1 pick which is just as likely to happen at 1-2, 1-3, 1-4 etc.... To turn around your question, what have we lost but for a few meaningless games. what's the difference between 100 losses and 110 losses (please don't say 10 losses). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MLB held the rights to DC when the Senators2 moved to Texas. Baltimore never had any legal claim to keep a team out of Washington.

What the Orioles had was the DC cable revenue which has always been considered apart from the Baltimore region by the FCC. So Mr. Angelos did a masterful job of obtaining media rights from southern Virginia to Pennsylvania. 

The dispute is more about two billionaires getting into a pissing contest. A pox on both of their houses.

 

 

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Larry18 said:

MLB held the rights to DC when the Senators2 moved to Texas. Baltimore never had any legal claim to keep a team out of Washington.

What the Orioles had was the DC cable revenue which has always been considered apart from the Baltimore region by the FCC. So Mr. Angelos did a masterful job of obtaining media rights from southern Virginia to Pennsylvania. 

The dispute is more about two billionaires getting into a pissing contest. A pox on both of their houses.

 

 

More like North Carolina to Pennsylvania.  I still can't believe that MASN is making millions from North Carolina cable TV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Not to mention the nearly infinite period of time he'll be eligible for some form of Vet's Committee to select him.  Deacon White died in 1939 and was inducted into the Hall in 2013.  That would be like inducting Altuve in the year 2156.
    • As has Velazquez.   And Velazquez is on the 40, Stevie isn't.
    • I still think we'll be improved.   Offense:  improved [relative to the league average that is, if they un-juice the balls a bit we could score the same # of runs but be improved] Defense:  Improved (SS, CF -- two of the most important positions) Bullpen:  Improved (pretty much have to be, we were nearly historically bad last year, even with regression to the mean we improve, and we will have Harvey for a full season) Starting:   Probably worse Division competition:  Yankees as good or better than 2019;  Tampa about the same;  Red Sox quite a bit worse; Jays better -- it's pretty much a push Interleague competition:  We still play the Nats as always; but otherwise we play the NL Central instead of the NL West last year.   NLC lacks a dominant team and has a potentially very bad Pirate team;  NL West last year had a great Dodger team and a couple other competitive teams, but a bad Giant team.   I think we get a tiny bit easier schedule here but not very significant. So I see only one factor -- albeit a really big one in starting pitching -- where we will be worse this year. So I'm going to say we have a better record than last year's 54-108.   The question to me is how much better?   I'd love to see us avoid 100 losses.
    • Rose didn't cheat, he bet on baseball games that he was involved in.  Cheating is being dishonest to gain an advantage.  Rose was breaking the rules for his own personal gain.  Making decisions based on bets usually is detrimental to the team, either in the short or long term.
    • Wouldn’t that give Wilkerson a leg up? He had considerable playing time everywhere.
    • You have Milone Hess and Scott. I have Stewart, Shepherd and Fry( I also have Smith not making the team. Despite losing10 pounds, I don’t see how that’s going to make him a better player.) I appreciate that you’re actually there watching the guys, so can you go into some detail about your choices?  Specifically, regarding Scott? His problem is that he walks too many guys, and his comments seem to indicate that he doesn’t see it as a mechanical problem, but as a mental one. Attitude does count for a whole lot, but sometimes the attitude can influence us to deny any other problems.
    • There are about 150 or so Hall of Fame position players.  Through Altuve's age (29) the median WAR value of those players is about 37.  Altuve's career to date has been worth 38 wins.  There have been 74 players with 35-41 wins through age 29.  About 12 are still active, with a handful of others retired but not yet HOF eligible.  Of the remaining 60 or so about 28 are in the Hall.  So I'd say just on merit he has a better than even chance of eventually going in.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...